Try, try again: Lessons learned from success and failure in participatory modeling

Participatory Modeling (PM) is becoming increasingly common in environmental planning and conservation, due in part to advances in cyberinfrastructure as well as to greater recognition of the importance of engaging a diverse array of stakeholders in decision making. We provide lessons learned, based on over 200 years of the authors’ cumulative and diverse experience, about PM processes. These include successful and, perhaps more importantly, not-so-successful trials. Our collective interdisciplinary background has supported the development, testing, and evaluation of a rich range of collaborative modeling approaches. We share here what we have learned as a community of participatory modelers, within three categories of reflection: a) lessons learned about participatory modelers; b) lessons learned about the context of collaboration; and c) lessons learned about the PM process. First, successful PM teams encompass a variety of skills beyond modeling expertise. Skills include: effective relationship-building, openness to learn from local experts, awareness of personal motivations and biases, and ability to translate discussions into models and to assess success. Second, the context for collaboration necessitates a culturally appropriate process for knowledge generation and use, for involvement of community co-leads, and for understanding group power dynamics that might influence how people from different backgrounds interact. Finally, knowing when to use PM and when not to, managing expectations, and effectively and equitably addressing conflicts is essential. Managing the participation process in PM is as important as managing the model building process. We recommend that PM teams consider what skills are present within a team, while ensuring inclusive creative space for collaborative exploration and learning supported by simple yet relevant models. With a realistic view of what it entails, PM can be a powerful approach that builds collective knowledge and social capital, thus helping communities to take charge of their future and address complex social and environmental problems.

[1]  Joshua Radinsky,et al.  Participatory Complex Systems Modeling for Environmental Planning: , 2020 .

[2]  R. K. Neumann,et al.  A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? , 2018 .

[3]  David Dunning,et al.  Hypocognition: Making Sense of the Landscape beyond One's Conceptual Reach , 2018 .

[4]  N. Horning,et al.  Biocultural approaches to developing well-being indicators in Solomon Islands , 2018 .

[5]  C. Prell,et al.  Purpose, processes, partnerships, and products: four Ps to advance participatory socio-environmental modeling. , 2018, Ecological Applications.

[6]  S. Marquart-Pyatt,et al.  Using participatory modeling processes to identify sources of climate risk in West Africa , 2018, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[7]  C. Hoch,et al.  How planners and stakeholders learn with visualization tools: using learning sciences methods to examine planning processes , 2017 .

[8]  Ana L. Porzecanski,et al.  Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation , 2017 .

[9]  Carl D. Shapiro,et al.  From data to decisions: Processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments , 2017 .

[10]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Combining participatory modelling and citizen science to support volunteer conservation action , 2017 .

[11]  Christopher A. Lepczyk,et al.  Combining watershed models and knowledge-based models to predict local-scale impacts of climate change on endangered wildlife , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Steven A. Gray,et al.  Using mental-modelling to explore how irrigators in the Murray–Darling Basin make water-use decisions , 2016 .

[13]  N. Bennett Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Suzanne A. Pierce,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders e Next generation , 2015 .

[15]  Carl S. Spetzler,et al.  Decision Quality: Value Creation from Better Business Decisions , 2016 .

[16]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies , 2015 .

[17]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Behavioural issues in environmental modelling - The missing perspective , 2015, Environmental Modelling & Software.

[18]  Scott Campbell,et al.  Planning for deep-rooted problems: What can we learn from aligning complex systems and wicked problems? , 2015 .

[19]  Romina Martin,et al.  Combining system dynamics and agent-based modeling to analyze social-ecological interactions—an example from modeling restoration of a shallow lake , 2015, Front. Environ. Sci..

[20]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Debiasing Decisions , 2015 .

[21]  Leilah Lyons,et al.  Seeing is not believing: cognitive bias and modelling in collaborative planning , 2015 .

[22]  P. Glynn Integrated Environmental Modelling: human decisions, human challenges , 2015, Special Publications.

[23]  Kenichi Matsui,et al.  Problems of Defining and Validating Traditional Knowledge: A Historical Approach , 2015 .

[24]  John Antonakis,et al.  Interpersonal Power , 2015 .

[25]  B. Nijstad APA Handbook of personality and social psychology , 2015 .

[26]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Power and social influence in relationships. , 2015 .

[27]  F. Madden,et al.  Conservation’s blind spot: The case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation , 2014 .

[28]  Christopher A. Lepczyk,et al.  Local‐Scale Dynamics and Local Drivers of Bushmeat Trade , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[29]  T. Sunderland,et al.  Limits to Indigenous Participation: The Agta and the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, the Philippines , 2014, Human ecology: an interdisciplinary journal.

[30]  Steven Gray,et al.  Are coastal managers detecting the problem? Assessing stakeholder perception of climate vulnerability using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping , 2014 .

[31]  M. Cormier-Salem Participatory governance of Marine Protected Areas: a political challenge, an ethical imperative, different trajectories. Senegal case studies , 2014 .

[32]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach , 2014, AMBIO.

[33]  Lorrae van Kerkhoff,et al.  Knowledge Governance for Sustainable Development: A Review , 2014 .

[34]  Samaneh Shokravi,et al.  Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  O. Wolkenhauer Why model? , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[36]  Pierre D. Glynn,et al.  W(h)ither the Oracle? Cognitive biases and other human challenges of integrated environmental modeling , 2014 .

[37]  L. Sébastien,et al.  Use and influence of composite indicators for sustainable development at the EU-level , 2013 .

[38]  Peter S. Hovmand,et al.  Community Based System Dynamics , 2013 .

[39]  M S Reed,et al.  Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Spatial representations are not neutral: Lessons from a participatory agent-based modelling process in a land-use conflict , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[41]  Cécile Barnaud,et al.  Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management , 2013 .

[42]  J. Holden,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Ecosystem Services, Governance and Stakeholder Participation Anticipating and Managing Future Trade-offs and Complementarities between Ecosystem Services , 2013 .

[43]  L. Connelly Grounded theory. , 2013, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[44]  Leilah Lyons,et al.  Modeling, learning, and planning together: An application of participatory agent-based modeling to environmental planning , 2012 .

[45]  S. Riley,et al.  Human dimensions of wildlife management , 2012 .

[46]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[47]  Mike Pearson,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future , 2022 .

[48]  Kirsten M. Leong,et al.  The New Governance Era: Implications for Collaborative Conservation and Adaptive Management in Department of the Interior Agencies , 2011 .

[49]  Jenni Glad Timmons A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future , 2011 .

[50]  A. Bakker,et al.  Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects , 2011 .

[51]  B. Büscher,et al.  The contemporary paradox of long-term planning for social-ecological change and its effects on the discourse-practice divide: evidence from Southern Africa , 2011 .

[52]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[53]  J. Holden,et al.  Ecosystems Services in Dynamic and Contested Landscapes: The Case of UK Uplands , 2009 .

[54]  J. Ogutu,et al.  Evolution of models to support community and policy action with science: Balancing pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in savannas of East Africa , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[56]  Kirsten M. Leong,et al.  Chapter 9 Overcoming jurisdictional boundaries through stakeholder engagement and collaborative governance: Lessons learned from white-tailed deer management in the U.S. , 2009 .

[57]  K. Andersson Beyond the Rural Urban Divide: Cross-continental Perspectives on the Differentiated Countryside and Its Regulation , 2009 .

[58]  Matt Lobley,et al.  What is land for? : the food, fuel and climate change debate , 2009 .

[59]  Moira L. Zellner,et al.  Embracing Complexity and Uncertainty: The Potential of Agent-Based Modeling for Environmental Planning and Policy , 2008 .

[60]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  The threat of weighting biases in environmental decision analysis , 2008 .

[61]  Nicolas Becu,et al.  Participatory computer simulation to support collective decision-making: Potential and limits of stakeholder involvement , 2008 .

[62]  E. Gaddis,et al.  Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners , 2008 .

[63]  J. Holden,et al.  If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: traditional versus participatory model building , 2007 .

[64]  G. Ritzer The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology , 2007 .

[65]  S. E. van der Leeuw,et al.  Why Model? , 2004, Cybern. Syst..

[66]  A. Borshchev,et al.  From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools , 2004 .

[67]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Alexander Conley,et al.  Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement , 2003 .

[69]  Olivier Barreteau,et al.  Our Companion Modelling Approach , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[70]  D. Roush Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[71]  Phyllis Beck Kritek,et al.  Negotiating at an uneven table : developing moral courage in resolving our conflicts , 2002 .

[72]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  L. Susskind,et al.  The consensus building handbook : a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement , 1999 .

[74]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[75]  Michael Doyle,et al.  Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making , 1998 .

[76]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[77]  J. Bart Acceptance Criteria for Using Individual‐Based Models to Make Management Decisions , 1995 .

[78]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[79]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[80]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information , 1980 .

[81]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[82]  J. Gillon,et al.  Group dynamics , 1996 .