PhyCoNet-Sim: A Framework for Physically Accurate Simulations of Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks

—For decades, the simulation has been a well-established methodology to study the behavior of wireless telecommunication networks. While network and link layer protocols are simulated by using very detailed models, there is typically still a lack of explicit and deterministic considerations of the physical layer. Phyical layer, antenna and radio channel are regularly approxi-mated with simplistic models based on statistic distribution of bit error rate values. While this approach might deliver a sufficient accuracy to compare the performance of routing protocols or other higher-level applications, it disallows, however, studying cross-layer concepts, multi-user communication or the explicit consideration of deterministic channel models. It also denies the physical layer to be an explicit degree of freedom in the design space. To overcome this problem, we set up a PhyCoNet-Sim, a co-simulation framework which links OMNeT++ to a physical layer simulator based on GNU Radio or Matlab/Simulink.

[1]  K. Höllig,et al.  Matlab® , 2020, Aufgaben und Lösungen zur Höheren Mathematik 1.

[2]  Florian Klingler,et al.  A systematic study on the impact of noise and OFDM interference on IEEE 802.11p , 2017, 2017 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[3]  Mario Gerla,et al.  IEEE802.11p in fast fading scenarios: from traces to comparative studies of receive algorithms , 2016, CarSys '16.

[4]  M. Walter Scattering in Non-Stationary Mobile-to-Mobile Communications Channels , 2016 .

[5]  Daniel Maier,et al.  Deterministic models of the physical layer through signal simulation , 2015, SimuTools.

[6]  Falko Dressler,et al.  Towards an Open Source IEEE 802.11p stack: A full SDR-based transceiver in GNU Radio , 2013, 2013 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference.

[7]  Frank Slomka,et al.  An approach for the integration of smart antennas in the design and simulation of vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2012, The First International Conference on Future Generation Communication Technologies.

[8]  Sorin A. Huss,et al.  Integrating Secure Beamforming into Car-to-X Architectures , 2011 .

[9]  Gerd Sommerkorn,et al.  Large Scale Parameter for the WINNER II Channel Model at 2.53 GHz in Urban Macro Cell , 2010, 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[10]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Physical Layer Emulation and Network Simulation , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[11]  S. Moser,et al.  Interactive Realistic Simulation of Wireless Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Interactive Ray Tracing.

[12]  Leif Kobbelt,et al.  Wave propagation using the photon path map , 2006, PE-WASUN '06.

[13]  Peter Steenkiste,et al.  A software architecture for physical layer wireless network emulation , 2006, WINTECH.

[14]  Kurt Rothermel,et al.  On the Impact of Radio Propagation Models on MANET Simulation Results , 2005 .

[15]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  An Efficient, Unifying Approach to Simulation Using Virtual Machines , 2004 .

[16]  Vesa Välimäki,et al.  Principles of fractional delay filters , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[17]  H.T. Friis,et al.  A Note on a Simple Transmission Formula , 1946, Proceedings of the IRE.