Fluid selection optimization of a combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system for residential applications

This research paper mainly deals with a comprehensive techno-economic modeling and multi-objective optimization of a CCHP system for residential application. An internal combustion engine (ICE) proposed as the prime power and a combined organic Rankine cycle (ORC), ejector refrigeration cycle (ERC), and domestic water heater (DWH) is considered to recover the wasted heat from the ICE through exhaust gas and water jacket. Their common working fluids namely R-134a, R-600, R-123, and R-11 are selected in this study. A comprehensive multi-objective optimization is applied to determine the optimal design parameters of the system. Two major objective functions, exergy efficiency that should be maximized and total cost rate of the system to be minimized are considered while satisfying several reasonable constraints. The total cost rate as an objective function consists of purchase equipment costs, fuel cost, and environmental impact cost. Diesel engine capacity, diesel engine part load, expander inlet pressure, expander extraction pressure, extraction ratio, condenser pressure, and evaporator pressure are selected as decision variables. A developed multi-objective genetic algorithm is used as an optimization tool with ability of better optimal results with less computer running time. It is observed that R-11 working fluid is a good candidate from both exergy efficiency and total cost rate point of view. To examine the effect of each decision variable on objective functions, a sensitivity analysis is performed. Finally, the ability of the system is studied to meet the cooling, heating, and electricity demand of a detached house with a defined load in Tehran.

[1]  Hassan Hajabdollahi,et al.  Thermo-economic environmental optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for diesel waste heat recovery , 2013 .

[2]  Mohammad Ameri,et al.  Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plant , 2008 .

[3]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of combined cooling, heating, and power systems with dual power generation units , 2014 .

[4]  Yiping Dai,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of a combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy , 2015 .

[5]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[6]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations , 2009 .

[7]  Mohammad Nazri Mohd. Jaafar,et al.  Exergoeconomic based optimization of a gas fired steam power plant using genetic algorithm , 2015 .

[8]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective o , 2011 .

[9]  K. Kobe The properties of gases and liquids , 1959 .

[10]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of a novel solar-based multigeneration energy system , 2014 .

[11]  Pedram Hanafizadeh,et al.  Thermo-economic analysis of combined power and water production in Iran by multi effect desalination method , 2016 .

[12]  Pouria Ahmadi,et al.  Exergoeconomic optimization of a trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose based on TRR method and using evolutionary algorithm , 2012 .

[13]  M. J. Moran,et al.  Thermal design and optimization , 1995 .

[14]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of waste heat recovery for cooling systems in hybrid and electric vehicles , 2012 .

[15]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Performance assessment and optimization of a novel integrated multigeneration system for residential buildings , 2013 .

[16]  Hassan E.S. Fath,et al.  Thermoeconomic analysis of some existing desalination processes , 2007 .

[17]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Development and assessment of an integrated biomass-based multi-generation energy system , 2013 .

[18]  Mojtaba Tahani,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON WASTE HEAT RECOVERY FROM INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES USING ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE , 2013 .

[19]  Pouria Ahmadi,et al.  Thermo‐economic‐environmental multiobjective optimization of a gas turbine power plant with preheater using evolutionary algorithm , 2011 .

[20]  Noam Lior,et al.  Energy, exergy, and Second Law performance criteria , 2007 .

[21]  Farshad Kowsary,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis and simulation of a new combined power and refrigeration cycle using artificial neural network , 2011 .

[22]  Mohammad Ameri,et al.  Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study , 2009 .

[23]  Nelson Fumo,et al.  Impact of CHP System Component Efficiencies on the Economic Benefit of CHP Systems Using Spark Spread Analysis , 2011 .

[24]  R. W. Marsh,et al.  Principles of refrigeration , 1990 .

[25]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Energy options for residential buildings assessment , 2013 .

[26]  Guo Tao,et al.  Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation , 2011 .

[27]  Ali Keshavarz,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of a micro-steam CCHP cycle for a residential building , 2012 .

[28]  He Weifeng,et al.  Comparative analysis of a bottoming transcritical ORC and a Kalina cycle for engine exhaust heat recovery , 2015 .

[29]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic and exergoenvironmental analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine power plant , 2011 .