Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Bryan E Pfingst | B. Pfingst | Li Xu | Catherine S. Thompson | Li Xu | Catherine S Thompson | Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz
[1] Z. Mo,et al. Firing features and potassium channel content of murine spiral ganglion neurons vary with cochlear location , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.
[2] Blake S. Wilson,et al. Engineering Design of Cochlear Implants , 2004 .
[3] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Jan Kiefer,et al. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[6] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Toshio Ishibashi,et al. Factors Associated with Poor Outcome in Children with Acute Otitis Media , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[8] D J Van Tasell,et al. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] A. Bregman,et al. Fusion of auditory components: Effects of the frequency of amplitude modulation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[10] M Pelizzone,et al. Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] J. Lindsay,et al. Profound deafness. Associated sensory and neural degeneration. , 1980, Archives of otolaryngology.
[12] F. Zeng,et al. Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] Rainer Hartmann,et al. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.
[14] R. Shannon. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Michael Tykocinski,et al. Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[16] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[17] Monita Chatterjee,et al. Across- and Within-Channel Envelope Interactions in Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[18] Bryan E. Pfingst,et al. Across-Site Threshold Variation in Cochlear Implants: Relation to Speech Recognition , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.
[19] B. Pfingst,et al. Psychophysical Metrics and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.
[20] M M Merzenich,et al. Coding Considerations in Design of Cochlear Prostheses , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[21] G M Clark,et al. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Bryan E. Pfingst,et al. Across-Site Variation in Detection Thresholds and Maximum Comfortable Loudness Levels for Cochlear Implants , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[23] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Q. Fu. Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users , 2002, Neuroreport.
[25] Anastasios Sarampalis,et al. Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report , 2006, Hearing Research.
[26] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] John C Middlebrooks,et al. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.
[28] J. Nadol,et al. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
[29] Qian-Jie Fu,et al. Effects of Stimulation Rate, Mode and Level on Modulation Detection by Cochlear Implant Users , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[30] B. Pfingst,et al. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses , 1999, Hearing Research.
[31] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] R. Shannon,et al. Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] J. Galvin,et al. The Role of Spectral and Temporal Cues in Voice Gender Discrimination by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[34] Robert V Shannon,et al. Open Set Speech Perception with Auditory Brainstem Implant? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.