Optimization of ethanol production from thick juice: A response surface methodology approach

Abstract The course of fermentation of thick juice as intermediate product of sugar beet processing by yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was studied in the paper. The feasibility of ethanol production from thick juice was experimentally confirmed in batch fermentation in a bioreactor of 1.5 L working volume. Important parameters for modelling of the process using response surface methodology were defined by analyzing the results of the course of fermentation. For description of the response function of the number of yeast cell number, ethanol volume fraction and total sugar mass fraction during fermentation, the effects of initial sugar content in the range 5–25% w/v and duration of fermentation in the range 0–48 h, were examined. Obtained models have contributed to a better understanding of the impact of different initial sugar mass fractions, fermentation time and interactions of these factors on the selected responses. Optimization of multiple responses was also simultaneously performed i.e. maximization of both yeast cell number and ethanol volume fraction while residual total sugar mass fraction was minimized. Results of optimization suggest that the optimal conditions are fermentation time of 46 h and initial sugar mass fraction of 20.67%. Further research was performed to validate the obtained results and confirm their applicability in the enlarged scale. The results obtained during the fermentation in bioreactor of 10 L working volume under optimal conditions defined for fermentation in the bioreactor of 1.5 L working volume were in good correlation.

[1]  Jelena Dodić,et al.  Potential contribution of bioethanol fuel to the transport sector of Vojvodina , 2009 .

[2]  David D. Hsu,et al.  Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover , 2010 .

[3]  F. Bai,et al.  Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. , 2009, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  A. Demirci,et al.  Ethanol production from carob extract by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[5]  M. Ergun,et al.  Application of a statistical technique to the production of ethanol from sugar beet molasses by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000 .

[6]  Penjit Srinophakun,et al.  Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[7]  José Ricardo Sodré,et al.  Hydrous ethanol vs. gasoline-ethanol blend: Engine performance and emissions , 2010 .

[8]  N. Narendranath,et al.  Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash , 2006, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  Tianwei Tan,et al.  Optimization of media conditions for the production of ethanol from sweet sorghum juice by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009 .

[10]  B. Kirsop Developments in beer fermentation , 1982 .

[11]  Huajiang Huang,et al.  A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries , 2008 .

[12]  G A Hill,et al.  Effects of high product and substrate inhibitions on the kinetics and biomass and product yields during ethanol batch fermentation , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Kenneth Helrich,et al.  Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists , 1990 .

[14]  Jelena Dodić,et al.  Bioethanol production from intermediate products of sugar beet processing with different types of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009 .

[15]  G. A. Hill,et al.  Recycle bioreactor for bioethanol production from wheat starch. II. Fermentation and economics , 2001 .

[16]  M. Moo-young,et al.  Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. , 2008, Biotechnology advances.

[17]  Mohamed Khayet,et al.  Response surface modelling and optimization in pervaporation , 2008 .

[18]  E Gnansounou,et al.  Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Z. Zavargo,et al.  The effect of turbulence promoter on cross-flow microfiltration of yeast suspensions: A response surface methodology approach , 2010 .

[20]  S. Rezzoug,et al.  Assessment of wood liquefaction in acidified ethylene glycol using experimental design methodology , 2003 .

[21]  Peter Glavič,et al.  Assessment of different strategies for the co-production of bioethanol and beet sugar , 2009 .

[22]  Elmer Ccopa Rivera,et al.  Evaluation of optimization techniques for parameter estimation: Application to ethanol fermentation considering the effect of temperature , 2006 .

[23]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  Estimation of un-used land potential for biofuels development in (the) People’s Republic of China , 2009 .

[24]  K. Hatano,et al.  Novel strategy using an adsorbent-column chromatography for effective ethanol production from sugarcane or sugar beet molasses. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[25]  W. Ingledew,et al.  Metabolic acclimatization: preparing active dry yeast for fuel ethanol production , 2005 .

[26]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. , 1986, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[27]  V. Mcdonald Direct Microscopic Technique to Detect Viable Yeast Cells in Pasteurized Orange Drink , 1963 .