User-product interaction has evolved dramatically over the past decades and has been the subject of many research activities. In an era where electrical components are replaced by electronic ones, and where functional elements become so small that they can be built into almost everything, designers acquire an enormous freedom in shaping new products. Especially in the field of consumer goods, where designers integrate function, human-factors and aesthetics, this newly gained freedom offers numerous opportunities to design innovative products and interfaces.
This paper reports on a design course of 3rd bachelor students product development of the Artesis University College Antwerp in collaboration with the company Niko, a Belgium based company that delivers products and solutions for switching materials, door communication systems, lighting control and home automation systems. The design course âuser experience designâ is an ideal context for students to gain insight in new interaction viewpoints such as ârich user interfacesâ and tangible interaction. It allows students to create design solutions that fit this young and emerging design philosophy. The design brief was presented by Niko as a kind of research by design approach: ârethink our digital remote LED strip control devices by researching new intuitive interaction solutions without displays or graphical interfacesâ. As a starting point, Niko introduced, by means of the persona technique, three different consumer types. The aim for Niko was not to collect short term applicable design solutions, but to get fresh and inspiring ideas from young and open-minded design students. Final design results show an interesting variety of alternative interaction solutions for the traditional remote controls. Students succeeded in designing rich user interaction hardware and haptic interfaces and proved that the overall learning goals were achieved. For the students it was interesting to see that in-house designers of a rather technologic oriented company find it essential to think conceptually. The students were happy to learn that their jobs go beyond the hands-on technical and technological problems solving activities they encounter in their daily work. From the industry perspective, Niko concluded that the collaboration with students broadened their view and confronted them with possible design directions they had not considered yet.
[1]
Jacob Buur,et al.
Hands-only scenarios and video action walls: novel methods for tangible user interaction design
,
2004,
DIS '04.
[2]
Amardeep M. Dugar,et al.
Tangible intervention: Improving the effectiveness of lighting control systems
,
2011
.
[3]
Joep Frens,et al.
Designing for rich interaction : integrating form, interaction, and function
,
2006
.
[4]
John S. Pruitt,et al.
The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design
,
2006
.
[5]
Protima Banerjee.
About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design: Alan Cooper and Robert Reimann Published by John Wiley & Sons, 2003, 576 pp, ISBN 0764526413
,
2004
.
[6]
Chris Dowlen,et al.
Industrial Briefs for Student Projects – A Company Perspective
,
2011
.
[7]
Johan Redström,et al.
From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things
,
2002,
TCHI.
[9]
Joep W. Frens,et al.
Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions
,
2000,
DIS '00.