Brain Network Architecture: Implications for Human Learning

Human learning is a complex phenomenon that requires adaptive processes across a range of temporal and spacial scales. While our understanding of those processes at single scales has increased exponentially over the last few years, a mechanistic understanding of the entire phenomenon has remained elusive. We propose that progress has been stymied by the lack of a quantitative framework that can account for the full range of neurophysiological and behavioral dynamics both across scales in the systems and also across different types of learning. We posit that network neuroscience offers promise in meeting this challenge. Built on the mathematical fields of complex systems science and graph theory, network neuroscience embraces the interconnected and hierarchical nature of human learning, offering insights into the emergent properties of adaptability. In this review, we discuss the utility of network neuroscience as a tool to build a quantitative framework in which to study human learning, which seeks to explain the full chain of events in the brain from sensory input to motor output, being both biologically plausible and able to make predictions about how an intervention at a single level of the chain may cause alterations in another level of the chain. We close by laying out important remaining challenges in network neuroscience in explicitly bridging spatial scales at which neurophysiological processes occur, and underscore the utility of such a quantitative framework for education and therapy.

[1]  J. Rogers Chaos , 1876 .

[2]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[4]  S. Snyder,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1999 .

[5]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.

[6]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[7]  P. Steerenberg,et al.  Targeting pathophysiological rhythms: prednisone chronotherapy shows sustained efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Graph Theory: An Introductory Course , 1980, The Mathematical Gazette.

[9]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Current opinion in neurobiology , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[11]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Journal of Complex Networks , 2013 .

[12]  Cheryl J. Wakslak,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 2013 .

[13]  S. Wereley,et al.  soft matter , 2019, Science.

[14]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2009 .

[16]  Theo van der Meer,et al.  Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. & Biomed. Sci. , 2008 .

[17]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  E. Kandel,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Annual subject and author indexes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  W. Cowan,et al.  Annual Review of Neuroscience , 1995 .

[21]  Taiwo Oladipupo Ayodele,et al.  Types of Machine Learning Algorithms , 2010 .

[22]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The Computational Brain , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[23]  VoLUME Xxxix,et al.  THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY , 2010 .

[24]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[25]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Spike-timing dependent plasticity , 2010, Scholarpedia.