In Search of an Objective Measure for the Perceptual Quality of Printed Images

This thesis is concerned with the topic of perceptual image quality. Our visual communication is mainly based on images, either natural or synthetic. Humans are able to judge whether an image is a good image. However, for many applications it would be faster and cheaper to estimate the quality of images using a computer. The major goal of this thesis is to find an objective measure for the quality of a printed image that corresponds to perceptual image quality. In addition to this major goal some secondary goals are defined as: 1) improving insight in the complex topic of perceptual quality, 2) determining the relation between perceptual attributes and image quality and 3) developing methods for color image processing. Two different perceptual attributes are investigated: sharpness and color contrast. Measures are developed that can be used to obtain an objective prediction of sharpening, smoothing and sharpness. In the color experiments the color of the images was changed with a gamma manipulation and a chroma scaling. These manipulations had a significant effect on perceptual quality. In the last part of this thesis it was evaluated how the gamut, that is the enveloppe of colors in color space that determine the limitations of the displaying device, can be incorporated into achromatic enhancement of color images and how this affects image quality. In this way, some of the differences between images displayed on a monitor and printed images can be taken into account.

[1]  Gaurav Sharma,et al.  Digital color imaging , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  H. Ridder,et al.  Chroma variations and perceived quality of color images of natural scenes , 1997 .

[3]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Image representation and compression with steered Hermite transforms , 1997, Signal Process..

[4]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[5]  M. Ronnier Luo,et al.  Calculating medium and image gamut boundaries for gamut mapping , 2000 .

[6]  P. Kubelka,et al.  New Contributions to the Optics of Intensely Light-Scattering Materials. Part I , 1948 .

[7]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[8]  M. Van Ginkel,et al.  Image analysis using orientation space based on steerable filters , 2002 .

[9]  Henry R. Kang Color Technology for Electronic Imaging Devices , 1997 .

[10]  V. Kayargadde,et al.  Feature extraction for image quality prediction , 1995 .

[11]  M. Luo,et al.  The structure of the CIE 1997 Colour Appearance Model (CIECAM97s) , 1998 .

[12]  Fjj Frans Blommaert,et al.  Predicting the usefulness and naturalness of color reproductions , 2000 .

[13]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[14]  Stephen D. Voran,et al.  Objective video quality assessment system based on human perception , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Ewald Hering Outlines of a theory of the light sense , 1964 .

[16]  Fjj Frans Blommaert,et al.  A computational approach to image quality , 2000 .

[17]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations , 1989 .

[18]  P. Lions,et al.  Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. II , 1992 .

[19]  J. L. Schnapf,et al.  5 – THE CONTROL OF VISUAL SENSITIVITY: Receptoral and Postreceptoral Processes , 1990 .

[20]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  End-to-end color printer calibration by total least squares regression , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[21]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  Color Printer Characterization Using a Computational Geometry Approach , 1997, CIC.

[22]  Hans Marmolin,et al.  Subjective MSE Measures , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[23]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  Naturalness and image quality: chroma and hue variation in color images of natural scenes , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  R. Hunt The Reproduction of Colour in Photography, Printing and Television , 1988 .

[25]  J A Stephen Viggiano,et al.  Modeling the Color of Multi-Colored Halftones , 2000 .

[26]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  A VISUAL DISCRIMINATION MODEL FOR IMAGING SYSTEM DESIGN AND EVALUATION , 1995 .

[27]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Color image quality metric S-CIELAB and its application on halftone texture visibility , 1997, Proceedings IEEE COMPCON 97. Digest of Papers.

[28]  A. Stuart,et al.  Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1957 .

[29]  E. Peli Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[31]  Ken Sagawa,et al.  Visual comfort to colored images evaluated by saturation distribution , 1999 .

[32]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Psychometric considerations in the dimensional analysis of subjective picture quality , 1987 .

[33]  Søren Bech,et al.  The RaPID Perceptual Image Description Method (RaPID) , 1996 .

[34]  Sn Yendrikhovskij,et al.  Color reproduction and the naturalness constraint , 1999 .

[35]  Maureen C. Stone,et al.  Color gamut mapping and the printing of digital color images , 1988, TOGS.

[36]  C. J. Bartleson Memory colors of familiar objects. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[37]  Fjj Frans Blommaert,et al.  Image Quality Semantics , 1997, Journal of Imaging Science and Technology.

[38]  M. Bernas,et al.  Image quality evaluation , 2002, International Symposium on VIPromCom Video/Image Processing and Multimedia Communications.

[39]  S. Sangwine,et al.  The Colour Image Processing Handbook , 1998, Springer US.

[40]  S. Nishikawa,et al.  Area properties of television pictures , 1965, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[41]  R. M. Evans The Perception of Color , 1974 .

[42]  Jacques A. J. Roufs,et al.  Brightness Contrast And Sharpness, Interactive Factors In Perceptual Image Quality , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[43]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  On the Application of Neural Networks to Non-Linear Image Processing Tasks , 1998, ICONIP.