Remotely detecting canopy nitrogen concentration and uptake of paddy rice in the Northeast China Plain

Abstract The influence of morphophysiological variation at different growth stages on the performance of vegetation indices for estimating plant N status has been confirmed. However, the underlying mechanisms explaining how this variation impacts hyperspectral measures and canopy N status are poorly understood. In this study, four field experiments involving different N rates were conducted to optimize the selection of sensitive bands and evaluate their performance for modeling canopy N status of rice at various growth stages in 2007 and 2008. The results indicate that growth stages negatively affect hyperspectral indices in different ways in modeling leaf N concentration (LNC), plant N concentration (PNC) and plant N uptake (PNU). Published hyperspectral indices showed serious limitations in estimating LNC, PNC and PNU. The newly proposed best 2-band indices significantly improved the accuracy for modeling PNU ( R 2  = 0.75–0.85) by using the lambda by lambda band-optimized algorithm. However, the newly proposed 2-band indices still have limitations in modeling LNC and PNC because the use of only 2-band indices is not fully adequate to provide the maximum N-related information. The optimum multiple narrow band reflectance (OMNBR) models significantly increase the accuracy for estimating the LNC ( R 2  = 0.67–0.71) and PNC ( R 2  = 0.57–0.78) with six bands. Results suggest the combinations of center of red-edge (735 nm) with longer red-edge bands (730–760 nm) are very efficient for estimating PNC after heading, whereas the combinations of blue with green bands are more efficient for modeling PNC across all stages. The center of red-edge (730–735 nm) paired with early NIR bands (775–808 nm) are predominant in estimating PNU before heading, whereas the longer red-edge (750 nm) paired with the center of “NIR shoulder” (840–850 nm) are dominant in estimating PNU after heading and across all stages. The OMNBR models have the advantage of modeling canopy N status for the entire growth period. However, the best 2-band indices are much easier to use. Alternatively, it is also possible to use the best 2-band indices to monitor PNU before heading and PNC after heading. This study systematically explains the influences of N dilution effect on hyperspectral band combinations in relating to the different N variables and further recommends the best band combinations which may provide an insight for developing new hyperspectral vegetation indices.

[1]  Anatoly Gitelson,et al.  Non-destructive determination of maize leaf and canopy chlorophyll content. , 2009, Journal of plant physiology.

[2]  John Angus,et al.  Soil tests to predict optimum fertilizer nitrogen rate for rice , 2006 .

[3]  P. Lancashire,et al.  A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds , 1991 .

[4]  Byun-Woo Lee,et al.  Assessment of rice leaf growth and nitrogen status by hyperspectral canopy reflectance and partial least square regression , 2006 .

[5]  Jianliang Huang,et al.  Using Leaf Color Charts to Estimate Leaf Nitrogen Status of Rice , 2003 .

[6]  Mikio Umeda,et al.  Integrating remote sensing and GIS for prediction of rice protein contents , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  Ma. Rebecca C. Laza,et al.  Chlorophyll meter estimates leaf area‐based nitrogen concentration of rice , 1995 .

[8]  X. Yao,et al.  Assessing newly developed and published vegetation indices for estimating rice leaf nitrogen concentration with ground- and space-based hyperspectral reflectance , 2011 .

[9]  Fumin Wang,et al.  Monitoring rice nitrogen status using hyperspectral reflectance and artificial neural network. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Weixing Cao,et al.  Quantitative relationships of leaf nitrogen status to canopy spectral reflectance in rice , 2007 .

[11]  Byun-Woo Lee,et al.  Using canopy reflectance and partial least squares regression to calculate within-field statistical variation in crop growth and nitrogen status of rice , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[12]  G. A. Blackburn,et al.  Quantifying Chlorophylls and Caroteniods at Leaf and Canopy Scales: An Evaluation of Some Hyperspectral Approaches , 1998 .

[13]  P. Thenkabail,et al.  Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics , 2000 .

[14]  M. Jeuffroy,et al.  Diagnosis tool for plant and crop N status in vegetative stage Theory and practices for crop N management , 2008 .

[15]  Kuo-Wei Chang,et al.  A Simple Spectral Index Using Reflectance of 735 nm to Assess Nitrogen Status of Rice Canopy , 2008 .

[16]  Georg Bareth,et al.  Evaluating hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimating nitrogen concentration of winter wheat at different growth stages , 2010, Precision Agriculture.

[17]  J. Schjoerring,et al.  Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression , 2003 .

[18]  G. Rondeaux,et al.  Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices , 1996 .

[19]  John R. Miller,et al.  Scaling-up and model inversion methods with narrowband optical indices for chlorophyll content estimation in closed forest canopies with hyperspectral data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  A. Huete,et al.  A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index , 1994 .

[21]  Weixing Cao,et al.  Monitoring Leaf Nitrogen Status in Rice with Canopy Spectral Reflectance , 2004, Agronomy Journal.

[22]  Yuxin Miao,et al.  Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[23]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Signature Analysis of Leaf Reflectance Spectra: Algorithm Development for Remote Sensing of Chlorophyll , 1996 .

[24]  A. Huete A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[25]  Tsuyoshi Akiyama,et al.  Canopy water deficit detection in paddy rice using a high resolution field spectroradiometer , 1993 .

[26]  G. F. Sassenrath-Cole,et al.  Reflectance indices with precision and accuracy in predicting cotton leaf nitrogen concentration , 2000 .

[27]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  The red edge position and shape as indicators of plant chlorophyll content, biomass and hydric status. , 1994 .

[28]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  A Comparison of Two Techniques for Nondestructive Measurement of Chlorophyll Content in Grapevine Leaves , 2008 .

[29]  Weixing Cao,et al.  Analysis of common canopy vegetation indices for indicating leaf nitrogen accumulations in wheat and rice , 2008, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[30]  M. Boschetti,et al.  Plant nitrogen concentration in paddy rice from field canopy hyperspectral radiometry , 2009 .

[31]  M. Ashton,et al.  Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM+ sensors in the study of African rainforests , 2004 .

[32]  C. V. Barton,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the influence of heterogeneity in chlorophyll distribution on leaf reflectance. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[33]  Chaoyang Wu,et al.  Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices : Modeling and validation , 2008 .

[34]  Thomas J. Overcamp,et al.  Estimation of Southeast Asian rice paddy areas with different ecosystems from moderate-resolution satellite imagery , 2012 .

[35]  J. Dash,et al.  The MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index , 2004 .

[36]  Ronnie W. Heiniger,et al.  Quantitative Approaches for Using Color Infrared Photography for Assessing In‐Season Nitrogen Status in Winter Wheat , 2003 .

[37]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Visible and near-infrared reflectance techniques for diagnosing plant physiological status , 1998 .

[38]  Randal K. Taylor,et al.  RED EDGE AS A POTENTIAL INDEX FOR DETECTING DIFFERENCES IN PLANT NITROGEN STATUS IN WINTER WHEAT , 2012 .

[39]  C. Jordan Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor , 1969 .

[40]  F. Baret,et al.  Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment , 1991 .

[41]  R. Nagarajan,et al.  Estimating Indigenous Nutrient Supplies for Site‐Specific Nutrient Management in Irrigated Rice , 2003 .

[42]  B. Yoder,et al.  Predicting nitrogen and chlorophyll content and concentrations from reflectance spectra (400–2500 nm) at leaf and canopy scales , 1995 .

[43]  D. Sims,et al.  Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages , 2002 .

[44]  D. Walvoort,et al.  A linear model to predict with a multi‐spectral radiometer the amount of nitrogen in winter wheat , 2006 .

[45]  B. Mistele,et al.  Estimating the nitrogen nutrition index using spectral canopy reflectance measurements , 2008 .

[46]  K. R. Reddy,et al.  Narrow-waveband reflectance ratios for remote estimation of nitrogen status in cotton. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[47]  Moon S. Kim,et al.  Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration from Leaf and Canopy Reflectance , 2000 .

[48]  John R. Miller,et al.  Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture , 2002 .

[49]  Jianliang Huang,et al.  Determination of optimal nitrogen rate for rice varieties using a chlorophyll meter , 2008 .

[50]  S. M. de Jong,et al.  Imaging spectrometry : basic principles and prospective applications , 2001 .