Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition.

According to dual-process models, excessive alcohol use emerges when response inhibition ability is insufficient to inhibit automatic impulses to drink alcohol. This study examined whether strengthening response inhibition for alcohol-related cues decreases alcohol intake. Fifty-two heavy drinking students were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: In the beer/no-go condition, participants performed a go/no-go task that consistently paired alcohol-related stimuli with a stopping response, to increase response inhibition for alcohol-related stimuli. In the beer/go condition, in contrast, participants were always required to respond to alcohol-related stimuli during the go/no-go task. Before and after the go/no-go manipulation, we measured weekly alcohol intake and implicit attitudes toward alcohol. In addition, we measured alcohol consumption during a taste test immediately after the go/no-go manipulation. Following the manipulation, participants in the beer/no-go condition demonstrated significantly increased negative implicit attitudes toward alcohol, and a significant reduction in weekly alcohol intake, while participants in the beer/go condition showed a non-significant increase in implicit positive attitudes toward alcohol and a significant increase in weekly alcohol intake. This study demonstrates that repeatedly stopping prepotent responses toward alcohol-related stimuli can be an effective strategy to reduce excessive alcohol use.

[1]  R. Wiers,et al.  Personalizing the alcohol-IAT with individualized stimuli: relationship with drinking behavior and drinking-related problems. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[2]  R. Wiers,et al.  High- and low-dose alcohol-related expectancies and the differential associations with drinking in male and female adolescents and young adults. , 1997, Addiction.

[3]  R. Wiers,et al.  Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. , 2009, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[4]  Harm Veling,et al.  When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: Behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation , 2018 .

[5]  E. Crone,et al.  Loss of willpower: Abnormal neural mechanisms of impulse control and decision making in addiction , 2005 .

[6]  M. Earleywine,et al.  Measuring alcohol expectancies with the implicit association test. , 2003, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[7]  M. Field,et al.  Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. , 2008, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[8]  R. Wiers,et al.  Learning to dislike alcohol: conditioning negative implicit attitudes toward alcohol and its effect on drinking behavior , 2010, Psychopharmacology.

[9]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. McCarthy,et al.  Implicit and explicit measures of alcohol and smoking cognitions. , 2006, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[11]  Jerry L. Grenard,et al.  Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: A review and a model , 2007, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[12]  Katrijn Houben,et al.  Are drinkers implicitly positive about drinking alcohol? Personalizing the alcohol-IAT to reduce negative extrapersonal contamination. , 2007, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[13]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[14]  R. Wiers,et al.  Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction , 2006 .

[15]  T. Palfai,et al.  Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. , 2003, Behaviour research and therapy.

[16]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Automatic and Controlled Response Inhibition: Associative Learning in the Go/no-go and Stop-signal Paradigms the Go/no-go Paradigm and the Stop-signal Paradigm , 2022 .

[17]  L. Sobell,et al.  Self-Report Issues in Alcohol Abuse: State of the Art and Future Directions , 1990 .

[18]  M. Field,et al.  The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers. , 2011, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[19]  H. Aarts,et al.  Unintentional preparation of motor impulses after incidental perception of need-rewarding objects , 2011, Cognition & emotion.

[20]  R. Wiers,et al.  Implicitly positive about alcohol? Implicit positive associations predict drinking behavior. , 2008, Addictive behaviors.

[21]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  R. Wiers,et al.  Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. , 2010, Addiction.

[23]  A. Bechara,et al.  Response inhibition deficit is involved in poor decision making under risk in nonamnesic individuals with alcoholism. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[24]  R. Wiers,et al.  Relatively strong automatic appetitive action‐tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G‐allele , 2009, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[25]  Roland Deutsch,et al.  Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behavior , 2006 .

[26]  Jerry L. Grenard,et al.  Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. , 2008, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[27]  Rita Z. Goldstein,et al.  Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.