Quantifying Conceptual Flexibility in a Compositional Network Model

A single concept can manifest in many varied forms, depending on the context in which it is activated. That is, concepts appear to be flexible rather than static. Here we implement a compositional model of conceptual knowledge in which basic-level concepts are represented as graph theoretical networks, with the specific goal of quantifying conceptual flexibility. We collect within-concept statistics using online participants, construct network models, and validate these models in a classification analysis. We then extract network measures and find that network diversity and core-periphery structure correspond to conceptual flexibility and stability, respectively. These results suggest that a compositional network model can be used to extract formal measures that are interpretable and useful in the study of conceptual knowledge.

[1]  Chris McNorgan,et al.  An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: simulating semantic priming , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Alejandro Ribeiro,et al.  Functional Alignment with Anatomical Networks is Associated with Cognitive Flexibility , 2016, Nature Human Behaviour.

[4]  Amy Perfors,et al.  Structure at every scale: A semantic network account of the similarities between unrelated concepts. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[6]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[7]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  L. Barsalou Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  Guido Previde Massara,et al.  Network Filtering for Big Data: Triangulated Maximally Filtered Graph , 2015, J. Complex Networks.

[11]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Wiring cost and topological participation of the mouse brain connectome , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  L. Tyler,et al.  Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.