A Survey on Data Reproducibility and the Effect of Publication Process on the Ethical Reporting of Laboratory Research
暂无分享,去创建一个
Rajat Bhattacharya | Lee M Ellis | Keith Baggerly | K. Baggerly | L. Ellis | F. Fan | Fan Fan | Delphine R Boulbes | Tracy Costello | Rui Wang | Xiangcang Ye | R. Bhattacharya | X. Ye | Rui Wang | D. Boulbès | Tracy Costello
[1] Richard Smith,et al. Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[2] Rhitu Chatterjee,et al. Cases of Mistaken Identity , 2007, Science.
[3] Suzanne K. Linder,et al. A Survey on Data Reproducibility in Cancer Research Provides Insights into Our Limited Ability to Translate Findings from the Laboratory to the Clinic , 2013, PloS one.
[4] F. Collins,et al. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.
[5] The erosion of research integrity: the need for culture change. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.
[6] M. Roach,et al. The declining interest in an academic career , 2017, PloS one.
[7] Natalie Matosin,et al. Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture , 2014, Disease Models & Mechanisms.
[8] Bob O'Hara,et al. Negative results are published , 2011, Nature.
[9] Marcus R. Munafò,et al. Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review , 2013, Nature.
[10] Monya Baker,et al. Cancer reproducibility project releases first results , 2017, Nature.
[11] A. Casadevall,et al. Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania , 2014, mBio.
[12] J. Neimark. Line of attack. , 2015, Science.
[13] S. Peddada,et al. Visualizing detailed postdoctoral employment trends using a new career outcome taxonomy , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.
[14] R. Neve,et al. The culture of cell culture practices and authentication--Results from a 2015 Survey. , 2015, BioTechniques.
[15] S. Gandevia. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance , 2018, Spinal Cord.
[16] S. Horbach,et al. The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature , 2017, PloS one.
[17] K. Hangos. THE LIMITS OF PEER REVIEW: , 1997, Evaluating Science and Scientists.
[18] H. Parkes,et al. The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need? , 2007, BioTechniques.
[19] C. Begley,et al. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research , 2012, Nature.
[20] Rajat Bhattacharya,et al. It Is Time to Re‐Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research , 2018, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[21] H. Drexler,et al. Mix-ups and mycoplasma: the enemies within. , 2002, Leukemia research.
[22] F. Prinz,et al. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[23] Chris Woolston. Graduate survey: Uncertain futures , 2015, Nature.
[24] Fernando T Maestre,et al. Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[25] M. Baker. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.