Quality assessment in surgical care departments: proposal for a scoring system in terms of structure and process

Objective To build a score able to reflect and rank surgical departments according to a definition of “quality” in terms of structure and process. Methods Collaborative design of a quality score in the framework of the French clinical research project NosoQual. Feasibility and observational study in 46 surgical departments visited between November 2002 and March 2003 according to standardised procedures. A bibliographic review followed by expert consultations, a field test, analysis and a final reconsideration leading to the definition of a consensual score. Results 138 variables comprised the score. They were classified into seven dimensions, each representing a different aspect of quality of care in surgery. According to the threshold and weight attributed to every variable, scores were calculated for each department. The average level of achievement of the scores varied from 42% to 71% of theoretical maxima. The variability of the scores related to the seven dimensions was larger and more significant than the one expressed by the overall score (coefficient of variation=0.1). Conclusion This analytical work contributed to the design of a quality score for surgery. However, the progress of the score should continue to take into account all the obstacles that were observed and to meet the high requirements of the actual patient safety issue.

[1]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Does the Surgical Apgar Score Measure Intraoperative Performance? , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[2]  J. Fabry,et al.  Quality assessment in intensive care units: proposal for a scoring system in terms of structure and process , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[3]  G. Rocco,et al.  Clinical and nonclinical indicators of performance in thoracic surgery. , 2007, Thoracic surgery clinics.

[4]  G. Rocco,et al.  The comparison of performance between thoracic surgical units. , 2007, Thoracic surgery clinics.

[5]  D. Harpole,et al.  Audit, quality control, and performance in thoracic surgery: a North American perspective. , 2007, Thoracic surgery clinics.

[6]  Mary R. Kwaan,et al.  An Apgar score for surgery. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  S. Khuri Safety, Quality, and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program , 2006, The American surgeon.

[8]  P. Argentero,et al.  Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Analysis of Adherence to Recommendations for Routine Infection Control Practices , 2006, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  Larry Hirschhorn,et al.  Evidence-based practice to reduce central line infections. , 2006, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[10]  A. V. Van rij,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR SURGICAL AUDIT IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND , 2006, ANZ journal of surgery.

[11]  M. Büchler,et al.  Relationships between Volume, Efficiency, and Quality in Surgery — A Delicate Balance from Managerial Perspectives , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  Joseph Conn Leading indicator. Program in Maryland has analyzed hospital quality for 20 years. , 2005, Modern healthcare.

[13]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Systems Approaches to Surgical Quality and Safety: From Concept to Measurement , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[14]  L. Seal,et al.  A systems approach to preoperative surgical patient skin preparation. , 2004, American journal of infection control.

[15]  Marc-Oliver Wright,et al.  Preliminary Assessment of an Automated Surveillance System for Infection Control , 2004, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[16]  M. Exner,et al.  Recommendations for surgical hand disinfection -- requirements, implementation and need for research. A proposal by representatives of the SFHH, DGHM and DGKH for a European discussion. , 2002, The Journal of hospital infection.

[17]  P. Roussel L'accréditation des établissements de santé , 2001 .

[18]  Nora Pf Improving safety for surgical patients: suggested strategies. , 2000 .

[19]  Robert Sherertz,et al.  Education of Physicians-in-Training Can Decrease the Risk for Vascular Catheter Infection , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  F. Grover,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[21]  S Amintabish,et al.  Fire safety in health care facilities. , 1997, Journal (Academy of Hospital Administration (India)).

[22]  V. Loo,et al.  Control of Construction-Associated Nosocomial Aspergillosis in an Antiquated Hematology Unit , 1996, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[23]  L. Parker Management of intravascular devices to prevent infection. , 2002, British journal of nursing.

[24]  P. Nora Improving safety for surgical patients: suggested strategies. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[25]  [Prevention, screening, and management of cancer of the colon. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé]. , 1998, Bulletin du cancer.