Scale-Free Correlations, Influential Neighbours and Speed Control in Flocks of Birds

Coordination of birds in large flocks is amazing, especially, since individual birds only interact with a few neighbors (the so-called ‘influential neighbours’). Yet, empirical data show that fluctuations of velocity and speed of different birds are correlated beyond the influential neighbours and are correlated over a larger distance in a larger flock. This correlation between the correlation length of velocity or speed and flock size was found to be linear, called a scale-free correlation. It depends on the way individuals interact in the flock, for instance, on the number of influential neighbours and speed control. It is unknown however, how exactly the number of influential neighbours affects this scale-free correlation. Recent empirical data show that different degrees of control of speed affect the scale-free correlation for speed fluctuations. Theoretically, based on statistical mechanics, it is predicted that at very high speed control, the correlation is no longer scale-free but saturates at a certain correlation length and this hampers coordination in flocks. We study these issues in a model, called StarDisplay, because its behavioural rules are biologically inspired and many of its flocking patterns resemble empirical data. Our results show that the correlation length of fluctuations of velocity as well as speed correlate with flock size in a scale-free manner. A higher number of influential neighbours causes a diminishing increase of the slope of the scale-free correlation with velocity, resulting thus in flocks that coordinate more uniformly. Similar to recent empirical data higher speed control reduces the correlation length of speed fluctuations in our model. As predicted theoretically, at very high speed control the model generates a non-scale free correlation, and although there are still flocks, they are in the process of disintegrating.

[1]  K. Dial Avian Flight , 2006 .

[2]  G. C. Rider,et al.  Radar ring angels and the roosting behaviour of starlings , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  F. Heppner,et al.  Structure of Turning in Airborne Rock Dove (Columba livia) Flocks , 1992 .

[4]  Taku Komura,et al.  Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  G. Parisi,et al.  Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring individual rules from collective behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[8]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  P. Fréon,et al.  Factors affecting information transfer from knowledgeable to naive individuals in groups , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  C. K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Individual variation by self-organisation , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[11]  J. Michael Davis,et al.  The coordinated aerobatics of dunlin flocks , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The effect of population size and number of influential neighbors on the emergent properties of fish schools , 2005 .

[13]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-organised complex aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model , 2009, 0908.2677.

[14]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  W. Bialek,et al.  Social interactions dominate speed control in poising natural flocks near criticality , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model , 2005 .

[17]  Marko Bacic,et al.  Modeling and Identification of Steppe Eagle (Aquila nipalensis) dynamics , 2008 .

[18]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1998 .

[19]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Simulations of the social organization of large schools of fish whose perception is obstructed , 2012 .

[20]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Artificial Fish Schools: Collective Effects of School Size, Body Size, and Body Form , 2003, Artificial Life.

[21]  Andreas Huth,et al.  THE SIMULATION OF FISH SCHOOLS IN COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994 .

[22]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Schools of fish and flocks of birds: their shape and internal structure by self-organization , 2012, Interface Focus.

[23]  Marko Bacic,et al.  Flight Control Mechanisms in Birds of Prey , 2007 .

[24]  U. Norberg Vertebrate Flight: Mechanics, Physiology, Morphology, Ecology and Evolution , 1990 .

[25]  A. Huth,et al.  The simulation of the movement of fish schools , 1992 .

[26]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Yukio-Pegio Gunji,et al.  Fluctuation-Driven Flocking Movement in Three Dimensions and Scale-Free Correlation , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  Guillermo Rein,et al.  44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit , 2006 .

[29]  Flavia Chiarotti,et al.  Aerial flocking patterns of wintering starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, under different predation risk , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Some Causes of the Variable Shape of Flocks of Birds , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  Yoshinobu Inada,et al.  Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  P. Clergeau Flocking behaviour of Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) during the day: A gradual gathering to the roost , 1990, Journal für Ornithologie.

[33]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  W. Nachtigall,et al.  Metabolic power of European starlings Sturnus vulgaris during flight in a wind tunnel, estimated from heat transfer modelling, doubly labelled water and mask respirometry , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  The flight behaviour of Starlings at a winter roost , 2007 .

[36]  E. Selous Thought Transference (or What ?) in Birds , 1932, Nature.

[37]  Hauke Reuter,et al.  SELFORGANIZATION OF FISH SCHOOLS : AN OBJECT-ORIENTED MODEL , 1994 .

[38]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[39]  Graham K. Taylor,et al.  Soaring and manoeuvring flight of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis , 2011 .

[40]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Collective motion in animal groups from a neurobiological perspective: the adaptive benefits of dynamic sensory loads and selective attention. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  C. K. Hemelrijka,et al.  Individual variation by self-organisation , 2005 .

[42]  T Kambara,et al.  Behavior pattern (innate action) of individuals in fish schools generating efficient collective evasion from predation. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.