PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AND SUSTAINABLE TELECOMMUTING: THE IMPORTANCE OF NEED FOR CONTROL

Technological, social, economic, and organisational factors are converging to facilitate remote or distributed work trends. Telecommuting ---working at home or at some other remote location and using communication technologies in lieu of the requirement to travel to the office--- is the best known of the distributed work options. Although telecommuting is on the increase, insufficient empirical data exists in relation to this work phenomenon. Accordingly, this paper reports on the results of a recent applied study in telecommuting (Meyers, 1999). The core premise-drawing on the principles of control as a core psychological construct, in particular, Bandura’s (1986, 1997) self-efficacy theory---is that individuals differ in levels of confidence in their abilities to exercise control over important aspects of their work and personal environments. Translated to the world of telecommuting, `control’, as indicated in the present study, therefore offers useful as well as empirically-alidated perspectives concerning the experiences of 155 Australian and United States ‘corporate’ telecommuters. Findings are that the Importance of Control as a person-centred factor is a predictor of all three proxy indicators of telecommuting sustainability: telecommuter productivity, telecommuter job satisfaction, and telecommuter lifestyle satisfaction. As well, Task Mediation via Others, as a self-efficacy construct, is an additional predictor of telecommuter productivity. . However, predictor factors as empirically identified in this paper are suggested as the key influences on sustainable telecommuting, in contrast to the many intuitively appealing factors frequently suggested in the telecommuting literature. A final benefit of the study was that it serves as an inventory of personal, work, organisational, and domestic factors that telecommuters themselves indicate as important to their work efficacy. Accordingly, the study has importance for IT and HRM managers; it should also assist policy-makers and planners keen to implement telecommuting in their respective organisations.

[1]  Paul E. Spector Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work , 1986 .

[2]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Randall B. Dunham,et al.  The impact of personal control on performance and satisfaction , 1989 .

[4]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[5]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[6]  Simon Robinson,et al.  Telework : present situation and future development of a new form of work organization , 1988 .

[7]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting: Setting the Context , 1993 .

[8]  Teri R. Switzer Telecommuters, the workforce of the twenty-first century : an annotated bibliography , 1997 .

[9]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting Frequency in California: An Exploratory Analysis , 1995 .

[10]  E. J. Phares Locus of control in personality , 1976 .

[11]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[12]  E. Hill The Perceived Influence of Mobile Telework on Aspects of Work Life and Family Life: An Exploratory Study , 1995 .

[13]  Jerry M. Burger,et al.  Desire for Control: Personality, Social, and Clinical Perspectives , 1992 .

[14]  J. Nilles Managing Telework: Strategies for Managing the Virtual Workforce , 1998 .

[15]  A. Bandura,et al.  Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  The Impact of Gender, Occupation, and Presence of Children on Telecommuting Motivations and Constraints , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  U. Huws,et al.  Telework: Towards the Elusive Office , 1990 .

[18]  A. M. th,et al.  The Alternative Workplace: Changing Where and How People Work. , 1998 .

[19]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Sphere-Specific Measures of Perceived Control , 1983 .

[20]  R. Kraut Telecommuting: The Trade-offs of Home Work , 1989, Journal of Communication.

[21]  J. Kugelmass Telecommuting: A Manager's Guide to Flexible Work Arrangements , 1995 .

[22]  Neville Meyers,et al.  Communication and control : case studies in Australian telecommuting , 2000 .

[23]  G. O'brien,et al.  Psychology of Work and Unemployment , 1986 .

[24]  M Apgar,et al.  The alternative workplace: changing where and how people work. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[25]  Charles R. Stoner,et al.  An investigation of selected variables affecting telecommuting productivity and satisfaction , 1991 .

[26]  Margrethe H. Olson,et al.  Work at home for computer professionals: current attitudes and future prospects , 1989, TOIS.

[27]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[28]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[29]  Kerry L. Marsh,et al.  Control motivation and social cognition , 1993 .

[30]  J.M.M. van der Wielen,et al.  Teleworking : International perspectives. From telecommunity to the virtual organisation , 1998 .

[31]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Development and Application of a Model of Personal Control in Organizations , 1986 .

[32]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change , 1996 .