Understanding material change: Design for appropriate product lifetimes

From the moment of purchase, pristine objects are subjected to an array of stimuli including wear, impact, heat, light, water and air which alter their tactile and aesthetic properties. Material change is often regarded as ‘damage’ or ‘degradation’, but has potential to be used as a tool to engender emotional engagement to an object and extend product lifetimes. The potential benefits, and complications, associated with material change in the context of designing for the circular economy and other sustainable product service systems is discussed. We present a framework for designers to better understand how materials change with use, and in turn how people respond to materials as they change. Key challenges are identified which must be overcome to use this framework in design practice: people’s physical interaction with objects is poorly understood, it is difficult to simulate material change, materials resources for designers do not provide information about material change, and people’s responses to aged materials depend on a complex web of interacting factors.

[1]  Mariale Moreno,et al.  Product longevity and shared ownership: sustainable routes to satisfying the world's growing demand for goods , 2015 .

[2]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  Design Strategies to Postpone Consumers' Product Replacement: The Value of a Strong Person-Product Relationship , 2005 .

[3]  Christopher R Gibson,et al.  Geographies of making , 2016 .

[4]  F. Krausmann,et al.  How Circular is the Global Economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005 , 2015 .

[5]  Jacquetta Lee,et al.  Single product, multi-lifetime components: challenges for product- service system development , 2015 .

[6]  T. Cooper Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society” , 2005 .

[7]  Martin Woolley,et al.  Choreographing obsolescence - ecodesign: the pleasure/dissatisfaction cycle , 2003, DPPI '03.

[8]  O. Mont,et al.  Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers , 2016 .

[9]  Nicolas P. Maffei,et al.  Historicizing Shininess in Design: Finding Meaning in an Unstable Phenomenon , 2013 .

[10]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice , 2013, CHI.

[11]  Jacquetta Lee,et al.  Redefining scope: the true environmental impact of smartphones? , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Harrison Hyung Min Kim,et al.  To Extend, or to Shorten: Optimal Lifetime Planning , 2012, DAC 2012.

[13]  Giana M. Eckhardt,et al.  Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing , 2012 .

[14]  Owain Pedgley,et al.  Sample libraries to expedite materials experience for design: A survey of global provision , 2016 .

[15]  Vicky Lofthouse,et al.  Worn out or worn in? How cosmetic wear affects semantic appraisals of materials , 2016, NordiCHI 2016.

[16]  Ayşen Ciravoğlu Demirdizen,et al.  PLATE: Product Lifetimes And The Environment , 2017 .

[17]  M. Miodownik,et al.  The use of physical property data to predict the touch perception of materials , 2012 .

[18]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design , 2002 .

[19]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Systems of practice and the Circular Economy: transforming mobile phone product service systems , 2017 .

[20]  Nicholas Lynch,et al.  Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world , 2016 .

[21]  ThE CirCUlAr,et al.  EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy , 2016 .

[22]  Elvin Karana,et al.  A tool for meaning driven materials selection , 2010 .

[23]  Miles Park Product life : designing for longer lifespans , 2009 .

[24]  Jacquetta Lee,et al.  What is ‘value’ and how can we capture it from the product value chain? , 2017 .

[25]  Jan Detand,et al.  Materials, Time and Emotion: how materials change in time? , 2015 .

[26]  Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Meaningful Stuff: Towards longer lasting products , 2014 .

[27]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Cosmetic wear and affective responses in digital products: towards an understanding of what types of cosmetic wear cause what types of attitudinal responses from smartphone users , 2015 .

[28]  Nicky Gregson,et al.  Practices of Object Maintenance and Repair , 2009 .

[29]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Aging gracefully to increase product longevity , 2015 .

[30]  Garrath T. Wilson,et al.  Cosmetic obsolescence? User perceptions of new and artificially aged materials , 2016 .

[31]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Wear and affect: cosmetic obsolescence of plastics in digital products , 2015 .

[32]  Garrath T. Wilson,et al.  Closing the Loop on E‐waste: A Multidisciplinary Perspective , 2019 .

[33]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Growing traces on objects of daily use: a product design perspective for HCI , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[34]  Tim Cooper,et al.  Longer Lasting Products: Alternatives To The Throwaway Society , 2010 .

[35]  A. Ball,et al.  The Role and Measurement of Attachment in Consumer Behavior , 1992 .

[36]  Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Design Strategies for the Eternal Reoccurrence of the New , 2016 .

[37]  N. V. Nes,et al.  Product lifetime optimization: a challenging strategy towards more sustainable consumption patterns , 2006 .

[38]  Sami Kara,et al.  Assessment of products for optimal lifetime , 2008 .

[39]  Maiju Aikala,et al.  Tactile perception : Finger friction, surface roughness and perceived coarseness , 2011 .

[40]  Weston L. Baxter,et al.  Contaminated Interaction: Another Barrier to Circular Material Flows , 2017 .

[41]  Tim Cooper,et al.  What is broken? Expected lifetime, perception of brokenness and attitude towards maintenance and repair , 2015 .

[42]  Marco Aurisicchio,et al.  Materials, use and contaminated interaction , 2016 .

[43]  Brian Henson,et al.  Surface finish and touch: a case study in a new human factors tribology , 2004 .

[44]  Giuseppe Salvia The satisfactory and (possibly) sustainable practice of do-it-yourself: the catalyst role of design , 2016 .

[45]  William Odom,et al.  Improving with age: designing enduring interactive products , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[46]  Anders Warell,et al.  MATERIAL SELECTION IN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN EDUCATION – A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2016 .

[47]  Caitlin DeSilvey Observed Decay: Telling Stories with Mutable Things , 2006 .

[48]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .