Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability

The authors review three theoretical approaches to strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR), which can be defined as voluntary CSR actions that enhance a firm’s competitiveness and reputation. The end result of such activities should be an improvement in financial and economic performance. Based on an overview of recent empirical evidence, the authors conclude that economic theories of strategic CSR have the greatest potential for advancing this field of inquiry, although theories of strategic leadership should also be incorporated into this perspective. In the remainder of the article, they provide focused summaries of the articles presented in this special issue and outline an agenda for future research on strategic CSR and environmental sustainability.

[1]  Erica Smith,et al.  Strategy and human resource management , 2013 .

[2]  Isaac Jordan Rodgers.  Corporate Social Responsibility in the Recession , 2012 .

[3]  Marc Orlitzky.  Institutional Logics in the Study of Organizations: The Social Construction of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance , 2011, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[4]  Jane Webster,et al.  Green Information Technologies and Systems: Employees’ Perceptions of Organizational Practices , 2011 .

[5]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  How Hot Is Your Bottom Line? Linking Carbon and Financial Performance , 2011 .

[6]  Peter Jack Gallo,et al.  Firm Size Matters: An Empirical Investigation of Organizational Size and Ownership on Sustainability-Related Behaviors , 2011 .

[7]  C. Post,et al.  Green Governance: Boards of Directors’ Composition and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[8]  Jenna P. Stites,et al.  Organizational Commitment in Manufacturing Employees: Relationships With Corporate Social Performance , 2011 .

[9]  Bertrand Valiorgue,et al.  Conditions for Value Creation in the Marketplace Through the Management of CSR Issues: A Negative External Effects Framework , 2011 .

[10]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Measuring Environmental Strategy: Construct Development, Reliability, and Validity , 2011 .

[11]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  Under the Tip of the Iceberg: Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Strategy, and Competitive Advantage , 2011 .

[12]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Domesticating Radical Rant and Rage: An Exploration of the Consequences of Environmental Shareholder Resolutions on Corporate Environmental Performance , 2010 .

[13]  Donald S. Siegel,et al.  Green management matters only if it yields more green: an economic/strategic perspective , 2010 .

[14]  Donald S. Siegel,et al.  The Oxford Handbook Of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2009 .

[15]  Adam R. Fremeth,et al.  Green Management Matters Regardless , 2009 .

[16]  S. Donald,et al.  Green Management Matters Only if it Yieds More Green: An Economic/Strategic Perspective , 2009 .

[17]  J. Quelch,et al.  Can Corporate Social Responsibility Survive Recession , 2009 .

[18]  Nathan T. Washburn,et al.  Unrequited Profit: How Stakeholder and Economic Values Relate to Subordinates' Perceptions of Leadership and Firm Performance , 2008 .

[19]  A. Stefan,et al.  Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview , 2008 .

[20]  D. Swanson,et al.  Toward Integrative Corporate Citizenship: Research Advances in Corporate Social Performance , 2008 .

[21]  R. Benton.  Business, Ethics, and the Environment: Imagining a Sustainable Future, by Joseph R. DesJardins. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007 , 2008, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[22]  W. Nordhaus.  A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies , 2008 .

[23]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[24]  L. Kurtz.  Socially Responsible Investment and Shareholder Activism , 2008 .

[25]  D. Vogel,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Government, and Civil Society , 2008 .

[26]  Aaron Chatterji,et al.  How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility? , 2008 .

[27]  D. Siegel,et al.  Defining the socially responsible leader , 2008 .

[28]  Jeffrey T. Macher,et al.  Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences , 2006, Business and Politics.

[29]  D. Swanson,et al.  Toward Integrative Corporate Citizenship , 2008 .

[30]  Benton.  Business, Ethics, and the Environment: Imagining a Sustainable Future , 2008 .

[31]  Marc Orlitzky,et al.  On The Effectiveness of Social and Environmental Accounting , 2007 .

[32]  Maitreesh Ghatak,et al.  Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[33]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  The Role of Perceived Organizational Performance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and Job Performance , 2007 .

[34]  Andrew A. King.  Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective , 2007 .

[35]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[36]  S. Banerjee.  Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly , 2008 .

[37]  Mansour Javidan,et al.  Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[38]  W. Nordhaus.  The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[39]  Michael L. Barnett,et al.  Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance , 2006 .

[40]  Colin Crouch,et al.  Modelling the Firm in its Market and Organizational Environment: Methodologies for Studying Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[41]  Pursey P.M.A.R. Heugens,et al.  Much Ado About Nothing: A Conceptual Critique of CSR , 2006 .

[42]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Green Markets and Private Provision of Public Goods , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[43]  T. Luca,et al.  The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[44]  B. Husted,et al.  Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance* , 2006 .

[45]  D. Siegel,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[46]  J. Moon,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence , 2006 .

[47]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications , 2006 .

[48]  John Van Maanen,et al.  Style As Theory , 2006 .

[49]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Stern Review : The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[50]  Tyson B. Mackey,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies , 2007 .

[51]  Michael L. Barnett.  Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[52]  Aaron K. Chatterji,et al.  Breaking down the Wall of Codes: Evaluating Non-Financial Performance Measurement , 2005 .

[53]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management , 2005 .

[54]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors , 2004 .

[55]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Lend me your wallets: the effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization , 2004 .

[56]  Mark Bagnoli,et al.  Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and The Private Provision of Public Goods , 2003 .

[57]  J. O. N. Entine,et al.  The Myth of Social Investing , 2003 .

[58]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[59]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[60]  J. Edwards.  Construct validation in organizational behavior research. , 2003 .

[61]  Karl Heiner,et al.  Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness , 2002 .

[62]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Raising Rivals' Costs Through Political Strategy: An Extension of Resource-based Theory , 2002 .

[63]  Patricia H. Thornton.  The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics , 2002 .

[64]  M. C. Jensen.  Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function* , 2001, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[65]  R. K. Sinha,et al.  What's hot and what's not , 2002 .

[66]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[67]  John D. Benjamin,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2001 .

[68]  Marc Orlitzky,et al.  Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? , 2001 .

[69]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  People and profits? : the search for a link between a company's social and financial performance , 2001 .

[70]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Organizational Attractiveness as an Employer on College Campuses: An Examination of the Applicant Population , 2001 .

[71]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[72]  James Robert Brown,et al.  Who rules in science? : an opinionated guide to the wars , 2001 .

[73]  David P. Baron,et al.  Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy , 2001 .

[74]  D. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce , 2000 .

[75]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .

[76]  B. Husted.  A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .

[77]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Issues in the Use of the Event Study Methodology: A Critical Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Studies , 1999 .

[78]  F. Reinhardt.  Bringing the environment down to earth. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[79]  David Moher,et al.  How Science Takes Stock: the Story of Meta-analysis , 1998, BMJ.

[80]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Applicant Attraction to Firms: Influences of Organization Reputation, Job and Organizational Attributes, and Recruiter Behaviors. , 1998 .

[81]  J. Mahon,et al.  The corporate social performance and corporate The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research , 1997 .

[82]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance And Organizational Attractiveness To Prospective Employees , 1997 .

[83]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation , 1996 .

[84]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Fear and Loathing in Organization Studies , 1995 .

[85]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Mortality, Reproducibility, and the Persistence of Styles of Theory , 1995 .

[86]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[87]  T. Jones.  INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[88]  L. Hosmer.  TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .

[89]  D. Wood,et al.  STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[90]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Crossroads Style as Theory , 1995 .

[91]  D. Swanson.  Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model , 1995 .

[92]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[93]  Wilfred Beckerman,et al.  'Sustainable Development': Is it a Useful Concept? , 1994 .

[94]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  PFEFFER'S Barriers to The Advance Of Organizational Science: A Rejoinder , 1994 .

[95]  J. Gans,et al.  How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists , 1994 .

[96]  J. Pfeffer.  Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[97]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organization Studies , 1993 .

[98]  Frank L. Schmidt,et al.  What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. , 1992 .

[99]  A. Carroll.  The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[100]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[101]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. , 1987 .

[102]  J. Hooley.  Data in Search of a Theory. , 1986 .

[103]  Arieh A. Ullmann.  Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[104]  Colin Camerer.  Redirecting research in business policy and strategy , 1985 .

[105]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[106]  R. Adair.  A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[107]  S. Ceci,et al.  Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[108]  L. Hedges,et al.  Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. , 1980 .

[109]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[110]  Janice M. Beyer,et al.  Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields , 1977 .

[111]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines , 1977 .

[112]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Cognition , 2002 .

[113]  Janice Beyer Lodahl,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. , 1972 .