Metacontrast and brightness discrimination

An attempt was made to obtain U-shaped masking functions in two metacontrast experiments. Trained Ss judged whether a square test stimulus (TS) was bright or dim. The TS was presented alone or in conjunction with an adjacent pair of square masking stimuli (MS) whose energy equaled the bright TS. The stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) rangedfrom 0 to 125 msec. The task minimized the role of apparent movement cues as a reliable basis for judgrnent. Similar studies have employed TS plus MS vs MS alone as the alternatives, allowing apparent movement to be a cue. Brightness accuracy was a U-shaped function of SOA. This finding is consistent with neural-net models (Weisstein, 1968). However, analysis of Ss’ response bias suggested an alternative explanation involving the MS as a comparison stimulus at short SOA. It was concluded that U-shaped masking functions are also consistent with theories based upon independent component processes, e.g., Schurman and Eriksen (1970) and Uttal (1970).

[1]  D. Kahneman.  Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  James E. Hoffman,et al.  Safari to masking land: A hunt for the elusive U , 1970 .

[3]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Detection in metacontrast. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  D. Schurman.  Predictive validity of a Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: Test of a model of masking for form , 1972 .

[5]  J. F. Collins,et al.  An analysis of certain factors responsible for nonmonotonic backward masking functions , 1967 .

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[8]  R N Haber,et al.  Note on how to choose a visual noise mask. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Metacontrast inferred from reaction time and verbal report: replication and comments on the Fehrer-Biederman experiment. , 1973, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[10]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Reinterpretation of one form of backward and forward masking in visual perception. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  N. Weisstein,et al.  A u-shaped backward masking function in vision , 1965 .

[12]  N Weisstein,et al.  A Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: simulation of metacontrast. , 1968, Psychological review.

[13]  F. H. Kanfer.  Perception: identification and instrumental activity. , 1956, Psychological review.

[14]  William R. Uttal,et al.  On the physiological basis of masking with dotted visual noise1 , 1970 .

[15]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal luminance summation effects in backward and forward masking , 1966 .

[16]  M W SCHMIDT,et al.  Discrimination of Successiveness: A Test of a Model of Attention , 1963, Science.

[17]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Operationism and the concept of perception. , 1956, Psychological review.

[18]  P. Marshall,et al.  Failure to replicate a reported U-shaped visual masking function , 1969 .

[19]  T. Spencer,et al.  Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Summation and interaction of successive masking stimuli in visual perception. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Sampling variability of the area under the ROC-curve and of d'e. , 1969 .