Assessing the capacity of a federated ground station

We introduce models and tools to assess the communication capacity of dynamic ground station networks, in particular federated networks that are composed of geographically diverse and independent stations that loosely collaborate to provide increased satellite connectivity. Network capacity is the amount of information exchanged between a network of satellites and ground stations. The constraints on total network capacity which influence transmission capabilities are outlined, such as the satellite, ground station, and overall network parameters. Orbit propagators are combined with engineering analysis software to compare the capacity of existing and future ground station networks. Simulation results from recent clustered satellite launches are presented and discussed. By studying network capacity, we identify the potential for leveraging these federated networks to support multiple missions from multiple institutions. Future work is outlined, including the need to accurately model both satellite communication requirements, develop real time network analysis tools, and work towards developing dynamic optimization techinques for global autonomous networks.

[1]  Z. Popovic,et al.  Steerable space fed lens array for low-cost adaptive ground station applications , 2007, 2007 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[2]  M. Carbonaro,et al.  von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics , 2004 .

[3]  Armando Fox,et al.  Applying the lessons of Internet services to space systems , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  Xin Meng,et al.  Genetic Algorithm for TDRS Communication Scheduling with Resource Constraints , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application Workshops.

[5]  C. Kitts,et al.  A MATLAB expert system for ground-based satellite operations , 2005, 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[6]  James Cutler,et al.  Mercury: a satellite ground station control system , 1999, 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99TH8403).

[7]  Jordi Puig-Suari,et al.  The CubeSat: The Picosatellite Standard for Research and Education , 2008 .

[8]  Armando Fox,et al.  A Federated Ground Station Network , 2002 .

[9]  Mary Ann Ingram,et al.  LEO Download Capacity Analysis for a Network of Adaptive Array Ground Stations , 2005 .

[10]  Armando Fox,et al.  A Framework For Robust and Flexible Ground Station Networks , 2006, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[11]  S N Prasad,et al.  Satellite Tracking Systems , 1995 .

[12]  Shinichi Nakasuka,et al.  Ground Station Network to Improve Operation Efficiency of Small Satellites and Its Operation Scheduling Method , 2006 .

[13]  Jeffrey S. Chase,et al.  Opal: A Single Address Space System for 64-bit Architectures , 1992, OPSR.

[14]  C.O. Demir.  Commercialization of Excess Capacity in Electro-Optical Satellites , 2007, 2007 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies.

[15]  Mark James,et al.  An architecture for an autonomous ground station controller , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[16]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[17]  Roger F. Malina,et al.  A Low-Cost, Autonomous, Ground Station Operations Concept and Network Design for EUVE and Other Earth-Orbiting Satellites , 1995 .

[18]  I. Harrison,et al.  Optimizing satellite, network, and ground station operations with next generation data visualization , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[19]  Tara Estlin,et al.  The past, present, and future of ground station automation within the DSN , 1999, 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99TH8403).