The structure and significance of community satisfaction

Residential and community satisfaction have been studied for many decades in an effort to understand human commitments to local places. In more recent years, concepts that more nearly reflect commitment have been developed, among them place attachment. Yet, the extensive, prior work on empirical indicators of satisfaction give that concept a particularly useful entry into studies of experiences of place, even though these may only provide estimates of phenomena of deeper commitment. The present study is drawn from the data for a large-scale investigation of the meaning ofcommunity in metropolitan America. Based on 2,622 women and men from 42 municipalities in 10 SMSAs across the United States, the study includes a sample of all socioeconomic statuses and from minority as well as majority populations. On the basis of factor analyses of a wide array of evaluations and satisfactions with housing, neighborhood, and the wider community, a structure for community satisfaction has been delineated. On the basis of these community satisfaction factors, along with several other social role and personality variables, an estimate is provided of the personal significance of community satisfaction in people's lives, using life satisfaction as the dependent variable. While there are socioeconomic status and other variations, community satisfactions appear to be important influences on life satisfaction at all socioeconomic status levels.

[1]  W. Goldsmith,et al.  Suburbanization and the City. , 1978 .

[2]  C. Fischer,et al.  Networks and places: social relations in the urban setting , 1977 .

[3]  C. Fischer,et al.  To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1984 .

[4]  P. Willmott,et al.  Family and Kinship in East London , 1958 .

[5]  K. Motamedi.  The quality of American life , 1976 .

[6]  N. Stokols,et al.  People in places: a transactional view of settings , 1981 .

[7]  H. Dunham,et al.  Mobility and Mental Health , 1966 .

[8]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being , 1976 .

[9]  J. Harvey.  Cognition, social behavior, and the environment , 1981 .

[10]  M. Fried,et al.  Some Sources of Residential Satisfaction in an Urban Slum , 1961 .

[11]  J. Bardo,et al.  A Re-Examination of Subjective Components of Community Satisfaction in a British New Town , 1983 .

[12]  H. Proshansky,et al.  Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self , 1983 .

[13]  Howard P. Chudacoff,et al.  The Gold Coast and the Slum: A Sociological Study of Chicago's Near North Side , 1983 .

[14]  K. Hourihan.  Context-Dependent Models of Residential Satisfaction , 1984 .

[15]  T. W. Freeman,et al.  Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction , 1978 .

[16]  J. Hole.  The homes of the working classes, with suggestions for their improvement , 1866 .

[17]  Herbert J. Gans,et al.  The Urban Villagers , 1962 .

[18]  P. Handal,et al.  Development of perceived and preferred measures of physical and social characteristics of the residential environment and their relationship to satisfaction , 1981 .

[19]  L. Duhl,et al.  The urban condition , 1963 .

[20]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  A Textbook of Econometrics. , 1954 .

[21]  M. Fried,et al.  Residential Attachment: Sources of Residential and Community Satisfaction , 1982 .

[22]  W. Whyte.  Street corner society : the social structure of an Italian slum , 1946 .

[23]  J. Riis.  How the Other Half Lives: Studies Among the Tenements of New York , 1903 .

[24]  A. Hunter.  Symbolic communities: The persistence and change of Chicago's local communities , 1974 .

[25]  S. Riger,et al.  Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods , 1981 .