The environmental footprint of a membrane bioreactor treatment process through Life Cycle Analysis.

This study includes an environmental analysis of a membrane bioreactor (MBR), the objective being to quantitatively define the inventory of the resources consumed and estimate the emissions produced during its construction, operation and end-of-life deconstruction. The environmental analysis was done by the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, in order to establish with a broad perspective and in a rigorous and objective way the environmental footprint and the main environmental hotspots of the examined technology. Raw materials, equipment, transportation, energy use, as well as air- and waterborne emissions were quantified using as a functional unit, 1m(3) of urban wastewater. SimaPro 8.0.3.14 was used as the LCA analysis tool, and two impact assessment methods, i.e. IPCC 2013 version 1.00 and ReCiPe version 1.10, were employed. The main environmental hotspots of the MBR pilot unit were identified to be the following: (i) the energy demand, which is by far the most crucial parameter that affects the sustainability of the whole process, and (ii) the material of the membrane units. Overall, the MBR technology was found to be a sustainable solution for urban wastewater treatment, with the construction phase having a minimal environmental impact, compared to the operational phase. Moreover, several alternative scenarios and areas of potential improvement, such as the diversification of the electricity mix and the material of the membrane units, were examined, in order to minimize as much as possible the overall environmental footprint of this MBR system. It was shown that the energy mix can significantly affect the overall sustainability of the MBR pilot unit (i.e. up to 95% reduction of the total greenhouse gas emissions was achieved with the use of an environmentally friendly energy mix), and the contribution of the construction and operational phase to the overall environmental footprint of the system.

[1]  M. T. Moreira,et al.  Environmental performance of a municipal wastewater treatment plant , 2004 .

[2]  F. Omil,et al.  Fate of pharmaceuticals and cosmetic ingredients during the operation of a MBR treating sewage , 2008 .

[3]  Ignasi Rodríguez-Roda,et al.  Comparison of removal of pharmaceuticals in MBR and activated sludge systems , 2010 .

[4]  M. V. Ruano,et al.  Environmental impact of submerged anaerobic MBR (SAnMBR) technology used to treat urban wastewater at different temperatures. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Giorgos Theodosiou,et al.  Environmental impacts of the Greek electricity generation sector , 2014 .

[6]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Emissions from photovoltaic life cycles. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Environmental impact of thin-film GaInP/GaAs and multicrystalline silicon solar modules produced with solar electricity , 2009 .

[8]  M. Poch,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental implications to include structural changes in a wastewater treatment plant , 2002 .

[9]  A. Schäffer,et al.  Factors affecting the removal of organic micropollutants from wastewater in conventional treatment plants (CTP) and membrane bioreactors (MBR) , 2008 .

[10]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Evaluation of drugs of abuse use and trends in a prison through wastewater analysis. , 2011, Environment international.

[11]  P. Lant,et al.  Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems. , 2010, Water research.

[12]  T. Tsoutsos,et al.  Life cycle assessment of advanced oxidation processes for olive mill wastewater treatment , 2013 .

[13]  F. A. Memon,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Greywater Recycling Technologies for New Developments , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[14]  S. Chae,et al.  Recent Advances in Membrane Bioreactors: Configuration Development, Pollutant Elimination, and Sludge Reduction , 2012 .

[15]  John N. Lester,et al.  The Life-Cycle Analysis of Small-Scale Sewage-Treatment Processes , 1995 .

[16]  Eva Risch,et al.  How environmentally significant is water consumption during wastewater treatment? Application of recent developments in LCA to WWT technologies used at 3 contrasted geographical locations. , 2014, Water research.

[17]  B. Ridoutt,et al.  Fresh tomato production for the Sydney market: An evaluation of options to reduce freshwater scarcity from agricultural water use , 2011 .

[18]  A. Erumban,et al.  Lifetimes of Machinery and Equipment. Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing , 2006 .

[19]  D Butler,et al.  Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment technologies treating petroleum process waters. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Asher Brenner,et al.  Fate of antibiotics in activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration (CAS-UF) and in a membrane bioreactor (MBR). , 2011, Water research.

[21]  George van Leeuwen,et al.  LIFETIMES OF MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT: EVIDENCE FROM DUTCH MANUFACTURING , 2008 .

[22]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  Life cycle analysis for bioethanol production from sugar beet crops in Greece , 2011 .

[23]  Francesc Castells,et al.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey , 2015 .

[25]  G. Rebitzera,et al.  Life cycle assessment Part 1 : Framework , goal and scope definition , inventory analysis , and applications , 2004 .

[26]  A. L. Esteban-García,et al.  Comparison between a fixed bed hybrid membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: a pilot-scale study. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[27]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Are all membrane reactors equal from an environmental point of view , 2012 .

[28]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town , 2007 .

[29]  Thomas D. Waite,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water Recycling Technology , 2005 .

[30]  Jianrong Chen,et al.  A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: Characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies , 2014 .

[31]  K. Kimura,et al.  Removal of pharmaceutical compounds by submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs) , 2005 .

[32]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the water and wastewater system in Trondheim, Norway – A case study , 2014 .

[33]  Mira Petrovic,et al.  Analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and removal using a membrane bioreactor , 2006, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[34]  G. Vallet,et al.  Chlorinated Polyethylene. II. Mechanisms of Chlorination , 1975 .

[35]  Adriano Joss,et al.  A rapid method to measure the solid-water distribution coefficient (Kd) for pharmaceuticals and musk fragrances in sewage sludge. , 2004, Water research.

[36]  H Wenzel,et al.  Environmental accounting--a decision support tool in WWTP operation and management. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[37]  J. Manem,et al.  TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER BY A MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR: RESULTS OF A SEMI-INDUSTRIAL PILOT-SCALE STUDY , 1994 .

[38]  J. Müller,et al.  Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[39]  C. Wisniewski,et al.  MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR FOR TREATMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER CONTAINING ACETAMINOPHEN , 2010 .