Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate.

BACKGROUND The effective orifice area (EOA) is the standard parameter for the clinical assessment of aortic stenosis severity. It has been reported that EOA measured by Doppler echocardiography does not necessarily provide an accurate estimate of the cross-sectional area of the flow jet at the vena contracta, especially at low flow rates. The objective of this study was to test the validity of the Doppler-derived EOA. METHODS Triangular and circular orifice plates, funnels, and bioprosthetic valves were inserted into an in vitro aortic flow model and were studied under different physiologic flow rates corresponding to cardiac outputs varying from 1.5 to 7 L/min. For each experiment, the EOA was measured by Doppler and compared with the catheter-derived EOA and with the EOA derived from a theoretic formula. In bioprostheses, the geometric orifice area (GOA) was estimated from images acquired by high-speed video recording. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the EOA derived from the 3 methods with the rigid orifices (Doppler vs catheter: y = 0.97x +0.18 mm(2), r(2) = 0.98; Doppler vs theory: y = 1.00x -3.60 mm(2), r(2) = 0.99). Doppler EOA was not significantly influenced by the flow rate in rigid orifices. As predicted by theory, the average contraction coefficient (EOA/GOA) was around 0.6 in the orifice plates and around 1.0 in the funnels. In the bioprosthetic valves, both EOA and GOA increased with increasing flow rate whereas contraction coefficient was almost constant with an average value of 0.99. There was also a very good concordance between EOA and GOA (y = 0.94x +0.05 mm(2), r(2) = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS In rigid aortic stenosis, the Doppler EOA is much less flow dependent than generally assumed. Indeed, it depends mainly on the GOA and the inflow shape (flat vs funnel-shaped) of the stenosis. The flow dependence of Doppler EOA observed in clinical studies is likely a result of a variation of the valve GOA or of the valve inflow shape and not an inherent flow dependence of the EOA derived by the continuity equation.

[1]  Robert A Levine,et al.  Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  H. Rimington,et al.  Determinants of symptoms and exercise capacity in aortic stenosis: a comparison of resting haemodynamics and valve compliance during dobutamine stress. , 2003, European heart journal.

[3]  N. Pandian,et al.  Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  I. Palacios,et al.  Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Mohr-Kahaly,et al.  Calculation of left ventricular outflow tract area using three-dimensional echocardiography , 1998, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[7]  E D Verrier,et al.  Dependence of Gorlin Formula and Continuit Equation Valve Areas on Transvalvular Volume Flow Rate in Valvular Aortic Stenosis , 1994, Circulation.

[8]  M. Crawford,et al.  Flow dependence of valve area in aortic stenosis: relation to valve morphology. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  A. J. Ward-Smith.  Internal Fluid Flow: The Fluid Dynamics of Flow in Pipes and Ducts , 1980 .

[10]  T. Lloyd.  Variation in Doppler-derived stenotic aortic valve area during ejection. , 1992, American heart journal.

[11]  E Sowton,et al.  Normal and stenotic human aortic valve opening: in vitro assessment of orifice area changes with flow. , 1990, European heart journal.

[12]  R. Shandas,et al.  Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: a numerical study. , 1998, Circulation.

[13]  E. Schwammenthal,et al.  Dobutamine echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: predicting outcome as a function of management strategy. , 2001, Chest.

[14]  Flow Dependence of Measures of Aortic Stenosis Severity During Exercise , 1995 .

[15]  R GORLIN,et al.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. , 1951, American heart journal.

[16]  B Wranne,et al.  Subaortic flow profiles in aortic valve disease: a two-dimensional color Doppler study. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[17]  J. Bermejo,et al.  Effects of dobutamine on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[19]  K Matre,et al.  Velocity distributions in the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Effect on the measurement of aortic valve area by using the continuity equation. , 1995, European heart journal.

[20]  J. Nordrehaug,et al.  Factors affecting Doppler echocardiographic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  J. Thomas,et al.  Real-time three-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography for characterizing the spatial velocity distribution and quantifying the peak flow rate in the left ventricular outflow tract. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[23]  S. Fujimoto,et al.  Contribution of Velocity Profiles at the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract to Calculations of Stroke Volume , 1999, Echocardiography.

[24]  J. Chambers,et al.  Continuity equation and Gorlin formula compared with directly observed orifice area in native and prosthetic aortic valves. , 1992, British heart journal.

[25]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) , 1998 .

[26]  C. Hamm,et al.  Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  R. Grose.  Orifice Contraction Coefficient for Inviscid Incompressible Flow , 1985 .

[28]  I. Idelchik.  Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[29]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  [Influence of the degree of aortic valve calcification on the estimate of valvular area using planimetry with transesophageal echocardiography]. , 1996, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[30]  E. Yellin,et al.  Hemodynamic Correlates of the Normal Aortic Valve Echogram: A Study of Sound, Flow, and Motion , 1976, Circulation.

[31]  K. Chan,et al.  Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. , 2000, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[32]  F. Flachskampf,et al.  Planimetry of orifice area in aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  V. Poutanen,et al.  Cross sectional profiles of systolic flow velocities in left ventricular outflow tract of normal subjects. , 1995, British heart journal.

[34]  R. Petitclerc,et al.  Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  Y Imai,et al.  Regulation of the aortic valve opening. In vivo dynamic measurement of aortic valve orifice area. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[36]  J. Schulz-Menger,et al.  Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, American heart journal.

[37]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept. , 2000, Circulation.

[38]  C. Otto,et al.  Experimental Validation of Doppler Echocardiographic Measurement of Volume Flow Through the Stenotic Aortic Valve , 1988, Circulation.

[39]  L. Badano,et al.  Changes in effective aortic valve area during ejection in adults with aortic stenosis. , 1996, American Journal of Cardiology.

[40]  D. Bacquer,et al.  Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality , 1995, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[41]  K. Karp,et al.  Flow dependence of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis: assessment by application of the continuity equation. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[42]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[43]  C. DeGroff.  Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[44]  Damien Garcia,et al.  Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areas. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[46]  Physiologic Changes with Maximal Exercise in Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis Assessed by Doppler Echocardiography , 1993 .

[47]  Robert L. Street,et al.  Theory of Jets in Ideal Fluids , 1965 .

[48]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.