Cognitive screening tools for predicting unsafe driving behavior among senior drivers

As Canada’s elderly continue to represent the fastest growing population in Canada, there has been an increasing need for effective and efficient screening tools for senior drivers, especially ones which identify possible cognitive impairments. Thus, the objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the available research surrounding the predictive value of pencil-and-paper cognitive screening tools. A systematic review of existing literature was conducted, with a final sample of 15 evaluation outcomes that identified 10 different pencil-and-paper tools. Multiple techniques were used to evaluate the data, including random effects modeling, meta-regression analysis and tests for bias, including publication bias. Finally, a multilevel meta-regression model was used to account for dependence of evaluation outcomes coming from the same study. A small to medium-sized significant pooled effect of 1.94 was found, indicating that when pencil-and-paper cognitive screening tools predict a driver is unsafe, there is a 94% greater chance that this driver will exhibit unsafe driving behaviors. Results, however, only provide partial evidence to inform the selection of pencil-and-paper cognitive screening tools, as it was not possible to unequivocally identify which tool performed best.

[1]  D. Carr,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Screening Tools for Drivers Aged 80 and Over , 2014 .

[2]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Meta-Analysis in Stata: An Updated Collection from the Stata Journal , 2015 .

[3]  C. Snellgrove Cognitive Screening for the Safe Driving Competence of Older People with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Early Dementia , 2005 .

[4]  Barbara Freund,et al.  Drawing clocks and driving cars , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  N. Korner-Bitensky,et al.  Predicting ability to drive after stroke. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Contour-Enhanced Funnel Plots for Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[7]  M. S. Patel,et al.  An introduction to meta-analysis. , 1989, Health Policy.

[8]  D. Carr,et al.  Predicting Road Test Performance in Drivers with Dementia , 2011, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  J. Duchek,et al.  Older adult drivers with cognitive impairment. , 2006, American family physician.

[10]  D. Roth,et al.  Useful Field of View and Other Neurocognitive Indicators of Crash Risk in Older Adults , 2004, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[11]  J. Macgregor,et al.  A Traffic Sign Recognition Test Can Discriminate Between Older Drivers Who Have and Have Not Had a Motor Vehicle Crash , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  Vida V Bliokas,et al.  Neuropsychological assessment of fitness to drive following acquired cognitive impairment , 2011, Brain injury.

[13]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Systematic Reviews in Health Care , 2001 .

[14]  C. Fabrigoule,et al.  The Wechsler Digit Symbol Substitution Test as the Best Indicator of the Risk of Impaired Driving in Alzheimer Disease and Normal Aging , 2010, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[15]  M. Pittler Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐analysis in Context , 2010 .

[16]  D. Carr,et al.  The older adult driver with cognitive impairment: "It's a very frustrating life". , 2010, JAMA.

[17]  Stephen J. Sharp,et al.  Meta-analysis regression , 1998 .

[18]  M. Oswanski,et al.  Evaluation of Two Assessment Tools in Predicting Driving Ability of Senior Drivers , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.