Learning by volunteer computing, thinking and gaming: What and how are volunteers learning by participating in Virtual Citizen Science?

Citizen Science (CS) refers to a form of research collaboration that engages volunteers without formal scientific training in contributing to empirical scientific projects. Virtual Citizen Science (VCS) projects engage participants in online tasks. VCS has demonstrated its usefulness for research, however little is known about its learning potential for volunteers. This paper reports on research exploring the learning outcomes and processes in VCS. In order to identify different kinds of learning, 32 exploratory interviews of volunteers were conducted in three different VCS projects. We found six main learning outcomes related to different participants' activities in the project. Volunteers learn on four dimensions that are directly related to the scope of the VCS project: they learn at the task/game level, acquire pattern recognition skills, on-topic content knowledge, and improve their scientific literacy. Thanks to indirect opportunities of VCS projects, volunteers learn on two additional dimensions: off topic knowledge and skills, and personal development. Activities through which volunteers learn can be categorized in two levels: at a micro (task/game) level that is direct participation to the task, and at a macro level, i.e. use of project documentation, personal research on the Internet, and practicing specific roles in project communities. Both types are influenced by interactions with others in chat or forums. Most learning happens to be informal, unstructured and social. Volunteers do not only learn from others by interacting with scientists and their peers, but also by working for others: they gain knowledge, new status and skills by acting as active participants, moderators, editors, translators, community managers, etc. in a project community. This research highlights these informal and social aspects in adult learning and science education and also stresses the importance for learning through the indirect opportunities provided by the project: the main one being the opportunity to participate and progress in a project community, according to one's tastes and skills.

[1]  Jason Reed,et al.  A framework for defining and describing key design features of virtual citizen science projects , 2012, iConference '12.

[2]  Rebecca Jordan,et al.  The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy , 2013, Public understanding of science.

[3]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Changes in participants' scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project , 2013 .

[4]  Ioanna Iacovides,et al.  Digital games : motivation, engagement and informal learning , 2012 .

[5]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[6]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[7]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. , 2009 .

[8]  R. Bonney,et al.  Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project , 2005 .

[9]  R. Bonney,et al.  Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen‐science project , 2000 .

[10]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design , 2012 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[13]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects , 2012, CSCW.

[14]  M. Haklay Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation , 2013 .

[15]  George Skaff Elias,et al.  Characteristics of Games , 2012 .

[16]  R. Jordan,et al.  Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Gordon Calleja,et al.  Digital Game Involvement , 2007, Games Cult..

[18]  R. Cronje,et al.  Does Participation in Citizen Science Improve Scientific Literacy? A Study to Compare Assessment Methods , 2011 .