Modal analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning feet: an initial investigation

The desire of individuals with a lower-limb amputation to participate in sports, coupled with the high demands of athletics, has resulted in the development of energy-storing-and-returning feet, capable of storing energy during stance and returning it to the individual in late stance to assist in forward propulsion. However, little attention has been paid to date to advance the understanding of their dynamic characteristics (natural frequencies, mode shapes and damping) during running. The evaluation of such parameters is now urgently required, as the use of energy-storing-and-returning feet is now being investigated through legal and justice systems to determine participation of amputee athletes using them at the Olympic Games. This paper presents a study of the dynamic characteristics of two commercially available Elite Blade composite feet (solid and split foot). A full modal analysis of the feet was conducted with varying masses attached to them, representing different body masses. The study showed that natural frequencies close to typical running step frequency can be achieved with simple control of the mass or stiffness. It was concluded that further study of the dynamic characteristics could result in a significant change in the design, development and the attitude towards the use of composite prosthetic feet. This initial study has highlighted the key questions that need to be answered to fully understand the dynamic characteristics and inform designers on how to tune a foot to match an amputee’s gait and body condition.

[1]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Prosthetic feet: State-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle–foot biomechanics , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[2]  Hugh M Herr,et al.  Running-specific prostheses limit ground-force during sprinting , 2010, Biology Letters.

[3]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  S. Noroozi,et al.  The design of lower‐limb sports prostheses: fair inclusion in disability sport , 2010 .

[5]  D. Shurr,et al.  Comparison of Energy Cost and Gait Efficiency During Ambulation in Below-Knee Amputees Using Different Prosthetic Feet—A Preliminary Report , 1988 .

[6]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Considerations for development of sensing and monitoring tools to facilitate treatment and care of persons with lower-limb loss: a review. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Biomechanics of double transtibial amputee sprinting using dedicated sprinting prostheses , 2008 .

[9]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  John Michael,et al.  Energy Storing Feet : A Clinical Comparison by , 2009 .

[11]  Matthew W Bundle,et al.  The fastest runner on artificial legs: different limbs, similar function? , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  Lee Nolan,et al.  Carbon fibre prostheses and running in amputees: a review. , 2008, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[13]  J G Buckley,et al.  Sprint kinematics of athletes with lower-limb amputations. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  An insight into Paralympic amputee sprinting , 1996 .

[15]  D. Pailler,et al.  Évolution des prothèses des sprinters amputés de membre inférieur , 2004 .

[16]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  P. E. Martin,et al.  Walking symmetry and energy cost in persons with unilateral transtibial amputations: matching prosthetic and intact limb inertial properties. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Donald G. Shurr,et al.  Gait Comparisons for Below-Knee Amputees Using a Flex-Foot™ Versus a Conventional Prosthetic Foot , 1991 .

[20]  Gerald Stark Perspectives on How and Why Feet are Prescribed , 2005 .