Garden Path and the Comprehension of Head-Final Relative Clauses

This chapter explores the issue of garden-path in the comprehension of head-final relative clauses (particularly in Chinese and Japanese). Experimental data from two self-paced reading studies in Chinese are compared, showing the existence of a main-clause garden-path effect on the object-extracted relative clause modifying the object of the matrix clause. Different approaches adopted to indicate an upcoming relative clause (and thus to avoid a potential garden-path effect) are evaluated, including using internal relative-clause markers, classifier-noun mismatches, relativization-inducing contexts and providing specific instructions on the existence and position of relative clauses in the matrix clauses. The garden-path effect associated with a relative clause can be avoided by using a classifier-noun mismatch along with a carefully constructed referential context. Experiments giving specific instructions on the existence of relative clauses can also diminish the garden-path effect.

[1]  Donald C. Baumer,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 2006 .

[2]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Processing relative clauses in Chinese , 2003, Cognition.

[3]  Marily Ford,et al.  A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences , 1983 .

[4]  Tomoko Ishizuka,et al.  PROCESSING RELATIVE CLAUSES IN JAPANESE 1 , 2005 .

[5]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[6]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Use Your Headedness: An Exercise in Psycholinguistic Exploitation1 , 2010 .

[7]  J. Mehler,et al.  Click monitoring revisited: An on-line study of sentence comprehension , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[9]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[10]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives , 1985 .

[11]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese , 2008 .

[12]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Processing of Locally Ambiguous Relative Clauses in German , 1995 .

[13]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Animacy and the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity in Relative Clause Comprehension in Mandarin , 2010 .

[14]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing , 2002 .

[15]  T. Givón,et al.  English grammar : a function-based introduction , 1995 .

[16]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[17]  J. Ting The Nature of the Particle Suo in Mandarin Chinese , 2003 .

[18]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  Subject Preference, Head Animacy and Lexical Cues: A Corpus Study of Relative Clauses in Chinese , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas Givon,et al.  English Grammar: A function-based introduction. Volume I , 1993 .

[20]  Jerome L. Packard,et al.  Filler-Gap Processing in Mandarin Relative Clauses: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 2010 .

[21]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Reading relative clauses in English , 2005 .

[22]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  Chien-Jer Charles Lin,et al.  GRAMMAR AND PARSING: A TYPOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF RELATIVE-CLAUSE PROCESSING , 2006 .

[24]  Namsil Lim Processing of Relative Clauses in Korean , 2012 .

[25]  Bradley L. Pritchett Head position and parsing ambiguity , 1991 .

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Michiko Nakamura,et al.  Subject/Object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese , 2003 .

[28]  M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[29]  J. Hayes Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .

[30]  Steven Abney,et al.  A computational model of human parsing , 1989 .

[31]  Yuki Hirose The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Processing relative clauses in Japanese: coping with multiple ambiguities , 2006 .

[32]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .

[33]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Subject Preference in the Processingof Relative Clauses in Chinese , 2006 .

[34]  Shari R. Speer,et al.  Effects of prosodic boundaries on ambiguous syntactic clause boundaries in Japanese , 2004, INTERSPEECH.

[35]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics edited by Mineharu Nakayama , 2006 .

[37]  Jerome L. Packard,et al.  Processing and producing head-final structures , 2011 .

[38]  Shari R. Speer,et al.  Prosodic Disambiguation of Syntactic Clause Boundaries in Korean , 2003 .

[39]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On not being led up the garden path : The use of context by the psychological syntax processor , 1985 .

[40]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[41]  B. Chiu An object clitic projection in Mandarin Chinese , 1995 .

[42]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Monitoring around the relative clause , 1980 .

[43]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[44]  Michael T. Wescoat,et al.  Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 1983 .

[45]  Edson T Miyamoto,et al.  Case Markers as Clause Boundary Inducers in Japanese , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  Bradley L. Pritchett Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .

[47]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Subject preference in Korean , 2006 .

[48]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences. , 1981 .

[49]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.