On soil-structure interaction in large non-slender partially buried structures

This paper addresses the seismic analysis of a deeply embedded non-slender structure hosting the pumping unit of a reservoir. The dynamic response in this type of problems is usually studied under the assumption of a perfectly rigid structure using a sub-structuring procedure (three-step solution) proposed specifically for this hypothesis. Such an approach enables a relatively simple assessment of the importance of some key factors influencing the structural response. In this work, the problem is also solved in a single step using a direct approach in which the structure and surrounding soil are modelled as a coupled system with its actual geometry and flexibility. Results indicate that, quite surprisingly, there are significant differences among prediction using both methods. Furthermore, neglecting the flexibility of the structure leads to a significant underestimation of the spectral accelerations at certain points of the structure.

[1]  P. B. Schnabel SHAKE-A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites , 1970 .

[2]  Enrique Alarcón,et al.  The use of direct boundary element method for gaining insight into complex seismic site response , 2005 .

[3]  K. Ishihara,et al.  Soil Behaviour In Earthquake Geotechnics , 1996 .

[4]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  Early history of soil–structure interaction , 2010 .

[5]  Juan J. Aznárez,et al.  Dynamic impedances of piles and groups of piles in saturated soils , 2005 .

[6]  George Gazetas,et al.  Winkler model for lateral response of rigid caisson foundations in linear soil , 2006 .

[7]  P. C. Jennings,et al.  Simulated earthquake motions , 1968 .

[8]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Soil moduil and damping factors for dynamics response analyses , 1970 .

[9]  Chandrakant S. Desai,et al.  Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering , 1979 .

[10]  George Gazetas,et al.  Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations , 2006 .

[11]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  Soil Structure Interaction Problems for Nuclear Containment Structures , 1974 .

[12]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  The spring method for embedded foundations , 1978 .

[13]  George Mylonakis,et al.  Elastodynamic model for large-diameter end-bearing shafts , 2001 .

[14]  J. Wolf Dynamic soil-structure interaction , 1985 .

[15]  Juan J. Aznárez,et al.  Three‐dimensional models of reservoir sediment and effects on the seismic response of arch dams , 2004 .

[16]  J. Domínguez Boundary elements in dynamics , 1993 .

[17]  Varun,et al.  A simplified model for lateral response of large diameter caisson foundations—Linear elastic formulation , 2009 .

[18]  J. Domínguez,et al.  Effects of Space Distribution of Excitation on Seismic Response of Arch Dams , 2002 .

[19]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Fundamental Concepts of Earthquake Engineering , 2009 .

[20]  Hiroyuki Watanabe,et al.  Effects of Flexibility on Rocking Impedance of Deeply Embedded Foundation , 2004 .