Would the objective be no more than a “desire” and the performance expression no more than a “feeling”? Some industrial fuzzy illustrations

Abstract This paper deals with conceptual considerations regarding the objective notion as well as the performance expression that is associated with its achievement. The suggested idea is to consider that the way the performance expression is computed depends on what we call the semantics of the objective. By considering that objectives are declared under the form of expected states, by anyone at any moment and with regards to any system, two specific kinds of such objectives will be thus distinguished; the “ desire” -objective on the one hand and the “requirement”-objective on the other hand. Besides, by considering that performance expression identifies the achievement degree of the assigned objective, we will show that this expression will also adopt different semantics. So-called “performance evaluation” and “performance measurement” will thus be distinguished in this context. In order to do this, we will first begin by recalling the essential definitions related to the objective notion, then the ones concerning the performance expression. We will thus show how the fuzzy subsets theory can be used in order to formalise both the desire-objective declaration and the requirement-objective declaration, as well as to compute their respective performance expression. Some industrial illustrations, which are extracted from a hydraulic cylinder manufacturer, will be presented simultaneously with the fuzzy formalisation. At the end of this study, concluding remarks and prospects will be then addressed.

[1]  Emiliano Lorini,et al.  Nonmonotonic Desires - A Possibility Theory Viewpoint , 2014, DARe@ECAI.

[2]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[3]  A. Neely The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next , 2005 .

[4]  Gert Adriaan Oosthuizen,et al.  Visual Management System to Manage Manufacturing Resources , 2017 .

[5]  Ali Siadat,et al.  VR-PMS: a new approach for performance measurement and management of industrial systems , 2013 .

[6]  Lamia Berrah,et al.  The Contribution concept for the control of a manufacturing multi-criteria performance improvement , 2019, J. Intell. Manuf..

[7]  Sai S. Nudurupati,et al.  State of the art literature review on performance measurement , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Applications of the MACBETH Approach in the Framework of an Additive Aggregation Model , 1997 .

[10]  Kelvin F. Cross,et al.  The “SMART” way to define and sustain success , 1988 .

[11]  G. Mauris,et al.  Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multi-criteria method , 2007 .

[12]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Visual management in production management : a literature synthesis , 2016 .

[13]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? , 2014 .

[14]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Quantitative models for performance measurement system , 2000 .

[15]  Yves Ducq,et al.  Coherence analysis methods for production systems by performance aggregation , 2001 .

[16]  Lamia Berrah,et al.  Towards a unified descriptive framework for industrial objective declaration and performance measurement , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[17]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Quantitative fuzzy semantics , 1971, Inf. Sci..

[18]  L. Berrah,et al.  Information aggregation in industrial performance measurement: rationales, issues and definitions , 2004 .

[19]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[20]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[21]  Laurent Foulloy,et al.  The aggregation of complementary information via fuzzy sensors , 1996 .