Using expected values to simplify decision making under uncertainty

A simulation study examines the impact of a simplification strategy that replaces distributional attribute evaluations with their expected values and uses those expectations in an additive value model. Several alternate simplified forms and approximation approaches are investigated, with results showing that in general the simplified models are able to provide acceptable performance that is fairly robust to a variety of internal and external environmental changes, including changes to the distributional forms of the attribute evaluations, errors in the assessment of the expected values, and problem size. Certain of the simplified models are shown to be highly sensitive to the form of the underlying preference functions, and in particular to extreme non-linearity in these preferences.

[1]  J. Davenport.  Editor , 1960 .

[2]  S. French.  Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality , 1986 .

[3]  G. Shafer.  Savage revisited , 1990 .

[4]  Bertrand Munier,et al.  Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality , 1994 .

[5]  T. Stewart.  Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM , 1996 .

[6]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Two ways to handle dependent uncertainties in multi-criteria decision problems , 2009 .

[7]  Handanhal Ravinder,et al.  Bias in Aggregations of Subjective Probability and Utility , 1992 .

[8]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Use of piecewise linear value functions in interactive multicriteria decision support: a Monte Carlo study , 1993 .

[9]  W. Edwards.  Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications , 1992 .

[10]  K. McConway,et al.  Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality , 1986 .

[11]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[12]  C. Kirkwood.  Estimating the Impact of Uncertainty on a Deterministic Multiattribute Evaluation , 1992 .

[13]  Lyle Brenner,et al.  Overconfidence in Probability and Frequency Judgments: A Critical Examination , 1996 .

[14]  F. H. Barron,et al.  INFLUENCE OF MISSING ATTRIBUTES ON SELECTING A BEST MULTIATTRIBUTED ALTERNATIVE , 1987 .

[15]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  N. Epley,et al.  The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic the Adjustments Are Insufficient , 2006 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[18]  Peter Naudé,et al.  Judgemental modelling as an aid to scenario planning and analysis 1 The co-authors dedicate the pape , 1999 .

[19]  Gina Beim,et al.  SELECTING PROJECTS FOR VENTURE CAPITAL FUNDING: A MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION APPROACH * , 2004 .

[20]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[21]  Nitin Garg,et al.  Combining decision tree and MAUT for selecting a country for a global manufacturing facility , 2007 .

[22]  Robert Fildes.  Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  John C. Butler,et al.  Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models , 1997 .

[24]  D. Keefer,et al.  Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables , 1983 .

[25]  T. Stewart.  Simplified approaches for multicriteria decision making under uncertainty , 1995 .

[26]  John D. Hey,et al.  Estimation of Expected Utility and Non-Expected Utility Preference Functionals Using Complete Ranking Data , 1994 .

[27]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[28]  D. Keefer.  Certainty Equivalents for Three-Point Discrete-Distribution Approximations , 1994 .

[29]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study , 1998 .

[30]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.