Calibration and Development of Safety Performance Functions for Alabama

One critical component of the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) statistical methods is the safety performance function (SPF). SPFs are essentially regression models that correlate quantitatively the expected number of crashes with traffic exposure and geometric characteristics of the road. As part of a project performed by the University of Alabama to facilitate implementation of the new HSM procedures in the state, this study aims to evaluate the applicability of HSM predictive methods to Alabama data and to develop state-specific statistical models for two facility types: two-lane, two-way rural roads and four-lane divided highways. This study first calibrates HSM base SPFs by using two approaches: the method recommended by the HSM and a newly proposed approach that treats the estimation of calibration factors as a special case of a negative binomial regression. In addition, new forms of state-specific SPFs are further investigated by using Poisson-gamma regression techniques. Four new functional forms are studied in this project. The prediction capabilities of the two calibrated models and the four newly developed state-specific SPFs are evaluated with a validation data set. Five performance measures are considered for model evaluation. The study is able to identify a particular state-specific SPF that fits the Alabama data well and outperforms other models, including the calibrated SPFs. The best model describes the mean crash frequency as a function of annual average daily traffic, segment length, lane width, year, and speed limit. The study finds that the HSM-recommended method for calibration factor estimation also performs well.

[1]  James A Bonneson,et al.  Development of Accident Modification Factors for Rural Frontage Road Segments in Texas , 2007 .

[2]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Investigating the effects of the fixed and varying dispersion parameters of Poisson-gamma models on empirical Bayes estimates. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[4]  John N. Ivan,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation of Safety Performance Functions for Two-Lane Highways Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Modeling , 2005 .

[5]  Xiaoduan Sun,et al.  Application of Highway Safety Manual: Louisiana Experience with Rural Multilane Highways , 2011 .

[6]  Nicholas J Garber,et al.  Development of Safety Performance Functions for Two-Lane Roads Maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation , 2010 .

[7]  J. Hilbe Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[8]  Simon Washington,et al.  Validation of Accident Models for Intersections , 2005 .

[9]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Poisson, Poisson-gamma and zero-inflated regression models of motor vehicle crashes: balancing statistical fit and theory. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Statistical Road Safety Modeling , 2004 .

[11]  J R Stewart,et al.  SAFETY EFFECTS OF THE CONVERSION OF RURAL TWO-LANE TO FOUR-LANE ROADWAYS BASED ON CROSS-SECTIONAL MODELS , 1999 .

[12]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[13]  L Mountain,et al.  Accident prediction models for roads with minor junctions. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Development and Application of Safety Performance Functions for Illinois , 2010 .

[15]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .

[16]  Simon Washington,et al.  On the nature of over-dispersion in motor vehicle crash prediction models. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Srinivas Reddy Geedipally,et al.  Application of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson generalized linear model for analyzing motor vehicle crashes. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.