Attenuation Correction for the HRRT PET-Scanner Using Transmission Scatter Correction and Total Variation Regularization

In the standard software for the Siemens high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) positron emission tomography (PET) scanner the most commonly used segmentation in the μ-map reconstruction for human brain scans is maximum a posteriori for transmission (MAP-TR). Bias in the lower cerebellum and pons in HRRT brain images have been reported. The two main sources of the problem with MAP-TR are poor bone/soft tissue segmentation below the brain and overestimation of bone mass in the skull. Method: We developed the new transmission processing with total variation (TXTV) method that introduces scatter correction in the μ-map reconstruction and total variation filtering to the transmission processing. Results: Comparing MAP-TR and the new TXTV with gold standard CT-based attenuation correction, we found that TXTV has less bias as compared to MAP-TR. We also compared images acquired at the HRRT scanner using TXTV to the GE Advance scanner images and found high quantitative correspondence. TXTV has been used to reconstruct more than 4000 HRRT scans at seven different sites with no reports of biases. Conclusion: TXTV-based reconstruction is recommended for human brain scans on the HRRT.

[1]  Z. Burbar,et al.  Evaluation of single photon transmission for the HRRT , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[2]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET images using probability maps , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Impact of attenuation correction strategies on the quantification of High Resolution Research Tomograph PET studies , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000 .

[5]  Claus Svarer,et al.  Quantification of 5-HT2A Receptors in the Human Brain Using [18F]Altanserin-PET and the Bolus/Infusion Approach , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  A. Rahmim,et al.  The second generation HRRT - a multi-centre scanner performance investigation , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[7]  Zang-Hee Cho,et al.  Analysis of Biased PET Images Caused by Inaccurate Attenuation Coefficients , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[9]  M. Sibomana,et al.  New attenuation correction for the HRRT using transmission scatter correction and total variation regularization , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[10]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[11]  Julian C. Matthews,et al.  Investigation of motion induced errors in scatter correction for the HRRT brain scanner , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[12]  R. Cloutier Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. , 1989 .

[13]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  H.W.A.M. de Jong,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of transmission and emission contamination using a collimated /sup 137/Cs point source for the HRRT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[15]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[16]  Sune H. Keller,et al.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[17]  C. Comtat,et al.  Image based resolution modeling for the HRRT OSEM reconstructions software , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[18]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Ilja Bezrukov,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  D. Townsend,et al.  Method for transforming CT images for attenuation correction in PET/CT imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  William F. Jones,et al.  Design and performance of a single photon transmission measurement for the ECAT ART , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  Z. H. Cho,et al.  Ultra Fast Symmetry and SIMD-Based Projection-Backprojection (SSP) Algorithm for 3-D PET Image Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  M. Sibomana,et al.  Spatial resolution of the HRRT PET scanner using 3D-OSEM PSF reconstruction , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[25]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Impact of Image-Space Resolution Modeling for Studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  C. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2008 .

[27]  C Nahmias,et al.  Single-photon transmission measurements in positron tomography using 137Cs. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.