Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact?

Abstract The explanation of different levels of innovation and their spatial distribution represents the central focus of the analysis. The empirical literature documents the incidence of spatial autocorrelation in patenting activities and interprets them as evidence for knowledge spillovers. Alternatively, the authors propose the spatial pattern of input variables in innovation processes as driving forces of patenting autocorrelation. They analyze 51 Nuts 1 regions in Europe and find that the high degree of spatial autocorrelation exhibited by patent applications can be explained comprehensively by the spatial location of the input factors in the knowledge production function. These are traditional indicators on R&D investments and human capital from Eurostat and proxy variables on social capital from the European Values Study. This finding has important implications for the scope of an autonomous regional innovation policy.

[1]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[2]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation , 2001 .

[3]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions , 2003 .

[4]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development: Specialization and Prosperity in Small Open Economies , 1998 .

[5]  C. Freeman.  Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[6]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences , 2001 .

[7]  B. Verspagen,et al.  Systems of Innovation , 2009 .

[8]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[9]  Harry H. Kelejian,et al.  On the asymptotic distribution of the Moran I test statistic with applications , 2001 .

[10]  F. Fukuyama.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity Penguin London , 1995 .

[11]  Michael Porter,et al.  The Economic Performance of Regions , 2003 .

[12]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[13]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[15]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[16]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe , 2005 .

[17]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered , 2001 .

[18]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[19]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[20]  Jan Schnellenbach,et al.  What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature , 2006 .

[21]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[22]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[23]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[24]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[25]  Attila Varga,et al.  Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities , 2000 .

[26]  J. Fagerberg.  Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature , 2003 .

[27]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[28]  Thierry van Bastelaer,et al.  Understanding and measuring Social Capital , 2002 .

[29]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[30]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[31]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[32]  Gottfried Tappeiner,et al.  The Learning Region: The Impact of Social Capital and Weak Ties on Innovation , 2007 .

[33]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[34]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[35]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[36]  P. David,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ECONOMY OF THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY , 2002 .

[37]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems : the role of governances in a globalized world , 1998 .

[38]  D. Foray.  Economics of knowledge , 2004 .

[39]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[40]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[41]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[42]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[43]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[44]  Mikel Buesa,et al.  Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region , 1996 .

[45]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[46]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[47]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .