The Influence of Effort and Performance Expectancy on Employees to Adopt E-government: Evidence from Oman

In the same context of previous studies on the adoption of E-government, this paper employs the Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model two constructs from this model were selected (performance expectancy, and effort expectancy) to examine their effect on the intention to adopt electronic government in Sultanate of Oman from an employees’ perspective. A manual survey was conducted to collect the request data. The total number of valid questionnaires for analysis was 204 which formed (83.3%) of the study sample. To confirm the internal consistency of construct and measures validity, Factor analysis and Reliability test were used for this purpose. In addition to, the multiple linear regression was used to test the study hypotheses. The study model explained (50.5%) of the whole deviation in employees’ Intention to adopt E-government. Moreover, both constructs performance expectancy, and effort expectancy have a significant influence on employees’ intention to adopt the electronic government. To empower employees to response to the requested e-services by citizens or businesses in real time, the adopted system to provide E-government services must be simplified, in addition to equipping employees with needed skills to use the mentioned system. The study originality lies in narrowing the UTUAT model which adopted only two constructs (performance expectancy, and effort expectancy) of this model. Then, implementing this adopted model on employees as individuals, not as representatives of government institutions, which considered the first study attempted to do such investigation.

[1]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Linda Dawson,et al.  E-government services in the local government context: an Australian case study , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[3]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Hafedh Al-Shihi,et al.  Exploring quality of e-Government services in Oman , 2013 .

[5]  Lemuria Ludwig Christian Megan E. Carter,et al.  The U.S. e-File Initiative: An Investigation of the Antecedents to Adoption from the Individual Taxpayers’ Perspective , 2012 .

[6]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  What facilitates e-government development? A cross-country analysis , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[7]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Citizen-centered e-government services: benefits, costs, and research needs , 2008, DG.O.

[8]  Matti Mäntymäki,et al.  Does E-government Trust in e-Commerce when Investigating Trust? A Review of Trust Literature in E-Commerce and e-government Domains , 2008, II3E.

[9]  Suha AlAwadhi,et al.  The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of E-Government Services in Kuwait , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[10]  M. Alraja,et al.  THE ROLE OF IT IN ENHANCING PRODUCTIVITY AT HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS FROM STAFF AND STUDENTS ’ PERSPECTIVE-EVIDENCE FROM OMAN , 2015 .

[11]  M. Alraja User Acceptance of Information Technology: A Field Study of an E-Mail System Adoption from the Individual Students' Perspective , 2015 .

[12]  Eric Deakins,et al.  Local e‐government impact in China, New Zealand, Oman, and the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[13]  A. Ho Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative , 2002 .

[14]  Lloyd George Waller,et al.  Barriers to transforming government in Jamaica , 2015 .

[15]  S. Al-Shafi,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING E-GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND ADOPTION IN THE STATE OF QATAR , 2009 .

[16]  Ludwig Christian Schaupp,et al.  Antecedents to E-File Adoption: The U.S. Perspective , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[17]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[19]  Graham Pervan,et al.  ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  E. Abu-Shanab Antecedents of trust in e-government services: an empirical test in Jordan: , 2014 .

[21]  Omiros D. Sarikas,et al.  Realising integrated e‐government services: a UK local government perspective , 2007 .

[22]  Brendan Eze Asogwa,et al.  Electronic Government as a Paradigm Shift for Efficient Public Services: opportunities and challenges for Nigerian government , 2013, Libr. Hi Tech.

[23]  Mansour Naser Alraja,et al.  E-Examinations for Management Students in Oman , 2017 .

[24]  M. Alraja,et al.  E-Business Adoption in Banking Sector: Empirical Study , 2015 .

[25]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems Development of a survey instrument to examine consumer adoption of broadband , 2016 .

[26]  Moaman Al-Busaidy,et al.  E‐government diffusion in Oman: a public sector employees' perspective , 2009 .

[27]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Research note: Toward a reference process model for citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐Government services , 2008 .

[28]  M. Alraja,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES ADOPTION : FIELD STUDY , 2015 .

[29]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Justifying the Decisions for EAI Adoption in LGAs: A Validated Proposition of Factors, Adoption Lifecycle Phases, Mapping and Prioritisation of Factors , 2009 .

[32]  I-Chiu Chang,et al.  Physicians' acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Sujeet Kumar Sharma,et al.  Adoption of e-government services: The role of service quality dimensions and demographic variables , 2015 .

[34]  Atul Gupta,et al.  Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[37]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government , 2003, DG.O.