Sequential sampling models without random between-trial variability: the racing diffusion model of speeded decision making
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Logan. Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .
[2] G. Woodman,et al. The Effect of Visual Search Efficiency on Response Preparation , 2008, Psychological science.
[3] F. Tuerlinckx,et al. Factoring out nondecision time in choice reaction time data: Theory and implications. , 2016, Psychological review.
[4] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Modeling one-choice and two-choice driving tasks , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[5] R. Anders,et al. The shifted Wald distribution for response time data analysis. , 2016, Psychological methods.
[6] Brandon M. Turner,et al. Toward a common representational framework for adaptation. , 2019, Psychological review.
[7] Braden A. Purcell,et al. From Salience to Saccades: Multiple-Alternative Gated Stochastic Accumulator Model of Visual Search , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[8] J. Ditterich. Evidence for time‐variant decision making , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.
[9] J. Vandekerckhove,et al. The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Non-Decision Time Effects in the Lexical Decision Task , 2009 .
[11] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Likelihood ratio sequential sampling models of recognition memory , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.
[12] Mark Steyvers,et al. An optimal adjustment procedure to minimize experiment time in decisions with multiple alternatives , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[13] G. Schwarz. Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .
[14] James P. Egan,et al. Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. , 1958 .
[15] Donald Laming,et al. Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .
[16] Francis Tuerlinckx,et al. Factoring out non-decision time in choice RT data : Theory and implications , 2016 .
[17] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] W. E. Hick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.
[19] Philip L. Smith,et al. The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination , 1988 .
[20] Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al. A diffusion model decomposition of the effects of alcohol on perceptual decision making , 2011, Psychopharmacology.
[21] G. Logan,et al. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. , 2014, Psychological review.
[22] Thomas V. Wiecki,et al. Estimating across-trial variability parameters of the Diffusion Decision Model: Expert advice and recommendations , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
[23] R. Ratcliff,et al. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[24] Jillian H. Fecteau,et al. Exploring the consequences of the previous trial , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[25] J. Starns. Using response time modeling to distinguish memory and decision processes in recognition and source tasks , 2014, Memory & Cognition.
[26] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[27] R. Ratcliff. A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[28] Matthew H. Wilder,et al. Sequential effects in response time reveal learning mechanisms and event representations. , 2013, Psychological review.
[29] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.
[30] R. Hyman. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.
[31] R. Ratcliff,et al. Diffusion model for one-choice reaction-time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[32] J. Andel. Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[33] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Internal and External Sources of Variability in Perceptual Decision-Making , 2017, Psychological review.
[34] R. Ratcliff,et al. Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[35] R. Ratcliff,et al. Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. , 2009, Psychological review.
[36] Marius Usher,et al. Disentangling decision models: from independence to competition. , 2013, Psychological review.
[37] H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .
[38] S. Link,et al. A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .
[39] James L. McClelland,et al. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.
[40] Philip L. Smith,et al. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.
[41] D. Strayer,et al. Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[42] Adam F. Osth,et al. Using response time distributions and race models to characterize primacy and recency effects in free recall initiation. , 2019, Psychology Review.
[43] James T. Townsend,et al. The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .
[44] Y. Ejima,et al. Estimation of the Timing of Human Visual Perception from Magnetoencephalography , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[45] W. Schwarz. The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[46] Scott D. Brown,et al. Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[47] Scott D. Brown,et al. The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[48] R. Ratcliff,et al. Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.
[49] Paul Sajda,et al. Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[50] A. Bompas,et al. Saccadic Inhibition Reveals the Timing of Automatic and Voluntary Signals in the Human Brain , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[51] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Systematic and random sources of variability in perceptual decision-making: Comment on Ratcliff, Voskuilen, and McKoon (2018). , 2020, Psychological review.
[52] James L. McClelland,et al. Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoffs , 2002 .
[53] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .
[54] Philip L. Smith. Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .
[55] Franck Vidal,et al. An ERP study of cognitive architecture and the insertion of mental processes: Donders revisited. , 2011, Psychophysiology.
[56] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model. , 2013, Psychological review.
[57] Andrew Heathcote,et al. The falsifiability of actual decision-making models. , 2014, Psychological review.
[58] Brandon M. Turner,et al. A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. , 2013, Psychological methods.
[59] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.
[60] Sumio Watanabe,et al. Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[61] S. Geisser,et al. A Predictive Approach to Model Selection , 1979 .
[62] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[63] John H. R. Maunsell,et al. Dynamics of neuronal responses in macaque MT and VIP during motion detection , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[64] A. Heathcote,et al. Is the Linear Ballistic Accumulator Model Really the Simplest Model of Choice Response Times: A Bayesian Model Complexity Analysis , 2009 .
[65] J. Schall,et al. Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.
[66] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Fitting Wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: An example using functions for the S-PLUS package , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[67] D. Rubin,et al. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .
[68] Scott D. Brown,et al. The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[69] Richard P. Heitz,et al. Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. , 2010, Psychological review.
[70] Andrew Heathcote,et al. An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. , 2008, Psychological review.
[71] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models for response time with different conclusions about psychological mechanisms? , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[72] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .
[73] Adam F. Osth,et al. A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[74] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Assessing the roles of change discrimination and luminance integration: evidence for a hybrid race model of perceptual decision making in luminance discrimination. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[75] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[76] Per B. Sederberg,et al. A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength , 2016, Neuropsychologia.
[77] Brandon M. Turner,et al. The dynamics of multimodal integration: The averaging diffusion model , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[78] Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm Differential Evolution: easy Bayesian computing for real parameter spaces , 2006, Stat. Comput..
[79] D. Teller. Linking propositions , 1984, Vision Research.
[80] D. Raab. DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .
[81] Scott D. Brown,et al. Response Times and Decision‐Making , 2018 .
[82] Jochen Ditterich,et al. Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: Behavior and physiology , 2006, Neural Networks.
[83] Andrew Heathcote,et al. A ballistic model of choice response time. , 2005, Psychological review.
[84] David S. Brée,et al. Linking Propositions , 1986, COLING.
[85] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Modeling confidence judgments, response times, and multiple choices in decision making: recognition memory and motion discrimination. , 2013, Psychological review.
[86] A. Voss,et al. Model Complexity in Diffusion Modeling: Benefits of Making the Model More Parsimonious , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[87] Roger Ratcliff,et al. The diffusion model is not a deterministic growth model: comment on Jones and Dzhafarov (2014). , 2014, Psychological review.
[88] Ehtibar N Dzhafarov,et al. Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time. , 2014, Psychological review.
[89] R. Ratcliff,et al. Modeling simple driving tasks with a one-boundary diffusion model , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[90] Brandon M. Turner,et al. Informing cognitive abstractions through neuroimaging: the neural drift diffusion model. , 2015, Psychological review.
[91] T. Hasbroucq,et al. Spatial enhancement of EEG traces by surface Laplacian estimation: comparison between local and global methods , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.