Design and Performance Analysis of Underwater Acoustic Networks

We analyze the performance of underwater acoustic ad-hoc networks in the presence of interference. We assume a uniform distribution of nodes over a finite area, and focus for simplicity on a two-dimensional network. The node-to-node channel is modeled using frequency dependent path loss and Ricean fading. We adopt a communication theoretic approach and study the sustainable number of hops through the network as an indicator of the network connectivity, as well as power and bandwidth requirements. The network operation is highly dependent on the node density with two distinct regions of limited performance: the coverage-limited region, where the number of nodes in the network is small, and the interference-limited region, where the number of nodes is large. We show that a desired level of connectivity can be achieved through a judicious selection of the operating frequency, power and bandwidth. Numerical examples illustrate the results of the analysis. These results motivate us to propose a hierarchical underwater acoustic sensor network architecture in which the sensors and the collector stations operate in distinct layers. The hierarchical architecture is supported by the property of the acoustic underwater transmission medium that for each transmission distance there exists an operating frequency for which the narrow-band signal-to-noise ratio is maximized. The sensors and the collector stations are consequently allocated different operating frequencies. We assume a uniform distribution of both sensors and collector stations over the finite area of the sensing field, and model the channel accordingly. The analysis is performed under the assumption that there is interference from other nodes within the same layer of the hierarchy. Numerical examples illustrate the network performance and demonstrate that the preferred operating frequencies ensure network operation without any cross-interference between the collector network and the sensor network.

[1]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Analysis of a Linear Multihop Underwater Acoustic Network , 2010, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[2]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics , 2011 .

[4]  S. Singh,et al.  The WHOI micro-modem: an acoustic communications and navigation system for multiple platforms , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[5]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Design and Capacity Analysis of Cellular-Type Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[6]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Distance aware collision avoidance protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[7]  Michael Faulkner,et al.  Multiple-access communications for underwater acoustic sensor networks using OFDM-IDMA , 2009, OCEANS 2009.

[8]  Parastoo Qarabaqia STATISTICAL MODELING OF A SHALLOW WATER ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION CHANNEL , 2009 .

[9]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  P.-P. Beaujean,et al.  An Improved Location-Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007.

[11]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Slotted FAMA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[12]  Gianluigi Ferrari,et al.  Ad Hoc Wireless Networks: A Communication-Theoretic Perspective , 2006 .

[13]  V. Rodoplu,et al.  UWAN-MAC: An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[14]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Distributed Routing Algorithms for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Energy-Efficient Routing Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  P. Casari,et al.  A Comparison of Multiple Access Techniques in Clustered Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[17]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Statistical characterization and capacity of shallow water acoustic channels , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[18]  M.J. Ryan,et al.  Design of a Propagation-Delay-Tolerant MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[19]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  OFDM and MC-CDMA: A Primer , 2006 .

[20]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  Improving the Robustness of Location-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[21]  Mehul Motani,et al.  MACA-U: A Media Access Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[22]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of the T-Lohi MAC for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[23]  Ghalib A. Shah,et al.  Performance evaluation of ad-hoc routing protocols in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2010, The 19th Annual Wireless and Optical Communications Conference (WOCC 2010).

[24]  Sergio Benedetto,et al.  Principles of Digital Transmission: With Wireless Applications , 1999 .

[25]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Growth of underwater communication technology in the U.S. Navy , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Ad hoc Networking , 2004 .

[27]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2007, MOCO.

[28]  L. Freitag,et al.  Multichannel Detection for Wideband Underwater Acoustic CDMA Communications , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[29]  Chai-Keong Toh,et al.  Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks , 2002 .