Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding

An experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of a briefly presented pattern-masked stimulus on (1) subjects' latency' to make a lexical decision regarding a subsequent letter string and (2) their episodic encoding of that letter string in long-term memory. During the first half of the experiment subjects participated in a primed lexical decision task (LDT). Half of the subjects received the primes at a preexperimentally determined critical threshold, whereas the remaining half received the primes at a suprathreshold level. The primes were either related ( GRAPE ). neutral ( XXXXX ), or unrelated ( BOX ) to the targets ( JAM ). The results of this priming task indicated that subjects responded faster to words which followed a related prime than to words which followed an unrelated prime in both the suprathreshold and, more interestingly, in the threshold condition, where the subjects were actually unable to reliably report the presence of the prime. Subjects were then given an episodic recognition test for the target words which were presented during the LDT. In the crucial conditons, the target was either contextually paired with the same related priming word or a different related word. For example, if the subject received the prime GRAPE followed by the target JAM , then at recognition the subject either received the pair GRAPE JAM or TRAFFIC JAM , with the task being to simply recognize the second word in each pair. The recognition results indicated that for the suprathreshold condition there was a large delecterious effect of switching context between study and test, whereas, for the threshold condition, there was virtually no effect of switching context. These results were viewed as indicating that it is possible to produce activation in semantic memory via a threshold stimulus, as indicated by the obtained priming effect; however, this activation does not appear to be useful in directing conscious attention for long-term storage.

[1]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[2]  D. Swinney Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[3]  G. Kleiman,et al.  Sentence frame contexts and lexical decisions: Sentence-acceptability and word-relatedness effects , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[4]  L. Postman,et al.  Norms of word association , 1970 .

[5]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Lexical access with and without awareness , 1981 .

[6]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[7]  David B. Mitchell,et al.  Specificity in Nonsemantic Orienting Tasks and Distinctive Memory Traces. , 1978 .

[8]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[9]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[10]  J. Yates,et al.  Priming dominant and unusual senses of ambiguous words , 1978 .

[11]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Semantic distance effects in categorization tasks. , 1982 .

[12]  Thomas H. Carr,et al.  Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification , 1980 .

[13]  T H Carr,et al.  Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  M. Turvey On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[15]  I. Fischler,et al.  Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[16]  G. Bower,et al.  A propositional theory of recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  The role of mental contiguity in memory: registration and retrieval effects , 1974 .

[18]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  John R. Anderson Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[20]  A. Marcel Conscious and preconscious recognition on polysemous words: Locating selective effects of prior verbal contexts , 1980 .

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[22]  Stephen J. Antos Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task. , 1979 .

[23]  P. Merikle,et al.  Unconscious perception revisited , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a two-process theory. , 1981 .

[25]  Phebe Cramer,et al.  A STUDY OF HOMOGRAPHS , 1970 .

[26]  L. Light,et al.  Effects of Changed Semantic Context on Recognition Memory , 1970 .

[27]  G. Humphreys Direct vs. indirect tests of the information available from masked displays: what visual masking does and does not prevent. , 1981, British journal of psychology.

[28]  James J. Jenkins,et al.  Word Association Norms: Grade School Through College , 1964 .

[29]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention , 1980 .

[30]  Donald H. Kausler,et al.  Word associations to homographs , 1970 .