Multi-Fequency, Pulse-to-pulse Coherent Doppler Sonar Profiler

Under ideal conditions, pulse-to-pulse coherent Doppler sonar can measure profiles of water velocity with unparalleled accuracy and resolution. However, this technique is limited in application by the occurrence of range and, more critically, speed ambiguities. A simple way to deal with speed ambiguities is to invert velocities using time history or prior knowledge of the flow structure, but these approaches are not always practical or reliable. Another technique is the use of a dual (or multiple) pulse repetition interval: this approach provides a reliable means of improvement but reduces the profile sample rate, and the pulse repetition interval is not always a free parameter (for example in the presence of a boundary). We present a new approach where multiple acoustic frequencies are used simultaneously, allowing a nearly five-fold increase in ambiguity velocity with no reduction in profile sample rate. Results are presented from a prototype multi-static system operating over the frequency range from 1.2 to 2.4 MHz, enabled in part through use of broad-band piezo-composite transducers. The prototype system generates two-component velocity profiles at a rate of 150 profiles/second over a 30 cm range interval with 3 mm range resolution. System performance is demonstrated under laboratory conditions with observations of flow in a turbulent jet.

[1]  Len Zedel Modeling Pulse-to-Pulse Coherent Doppler Sonar , 2008 .

[2]  U. Lemmin,et al.  Shear stress statistics and wall similarity analysis in turbulent boundary layers using a high-resolution 3-D ADVP , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[3]  P. Joe,et al.  Correction of Dual PRF Velocity Errors for Operational Doppler Weather Radars , 2003 .

[4]  Alex E. Hay,et al.  Coherent Doppler Profiler measurements of near-bed suspended sediment fluxes and the influence of bed forms , 2002 .

[5]  C. Burckhardt,et al.  A new pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound system to measure blood velocities beyond the Nyquist limit , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  David Hurther,et al.  Turbulent transport in the outer region of rough-wall open-channel flows: the contribution of large coherent shear stress structures (LC3S) , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Kenneth S. Miller,et al.  A covariance approach to spectral moment estimation , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  A Real-Time Four-Dimensional Doppler Dealiasing Scheme , 2001 .

[10]  Iwan Holleman,et al.  Analysis and Correction of Dual PRF Velocity Data , 2003 .

[11]  G York,et al.  Ultrasound processing and computing: review and future directions. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  Fabrice Veron,et al.  Pulse-to-Pulse Coherent Doppler Measurements of Waves and Turbulence , 1999 .

[13]  David M. Farmer,et al.  On the dense bubble clouds and near bottom turbulence in the surf zone , 2005 .

[14]  P. Thorne,et al.  Acoustic measurements of boundary layer flow and sediment flux. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A. Lohrmann,et al.  High Resolution Measurements of Turbulence, Velocity and Stress Using a Pulse-to-Pulse Coherent Sonar , 1990 .

[16]  J. Gemmrich,et al.  Near-Surface Turbulence in the Presence of Breaking Waves , 2004 .