Granulometric parametric estimation for the random Boolean model using optimal linear filters and optimal structuring elements

Morphological granulometries have been used successfully to discriminate textures in the context of classical feature-based classification, and more recently they have been used as observation variables for estimators in the context of random sets. This paper considers optimal linear parametric estimation of the law of a random set. It is set in a Bayesian framework in that estimation is of the law of a random Boolean model whose parameters satisfy prior distributions. It is assumed that the distribution of the primary grain has unknown parameters, and the task is to estimate these model parameters, along with the intensity of the Boolean model. The estimator will be the optimal linear filter for an input vector of granulometric moments. Furthermore, it will be assumed that the structuring elements generating the granulometry are themselves parameterized, and that the optimal parameters (those giving rise to the best optimal filter) are to be determined. It is experimentally observed that choosing optimal structuring elements can give much better results than arbitrarily choosing structuring element parameters.

[1]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Random processes for image and signal processing , 1998, SPIE / IEEE series on imaging science and engineering.

[2]  Jeff B. Pelz,et al.  Morphological granulometric analysis of electrophotographic images--size distribution statistics for process control , 1991 .

[3]  Jeff B. Pelz,et al.  Morphological texture-based maximum-likelihood pixel classification based on local granulometric moments , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar,et al.  Discrete morphological size distributions and densities: estimation techniques and applications , 1997, J. Electronic Imaging.

[5]  I. Molchanov Statistics of the Boolean Model for Practitioners and Mathematicians , 1997 .

[6]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Morphological granulometric estimation of random patterns in the context of parameterized random sets , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Model-based morphology: the opening spectrum , 1995, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[8]  G. Matheron Random Sets and Integral Geometry , 1976 .

[9]  Michel Schmitt Estimation of the density in a stationary Boolean model , 1991 .

[10]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Heterogeneous morphological granulometries , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  E. Dougherty,et al.  Gray-scale morphological granulometric texture classification , 1994 .

[12]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Optimal linear granulometric estimation for random sets , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Asymptotic granulometric mixing theorem: Morphological estimation of sizing parameters and mixture proportions , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  E. Dougherty,et al.  Size-distribution estimation in process fluids by ultrasound for particle sizes in the wavelength range , 1993 .

[15]  G. Ayala,et al.  Granulometric moments and corneal endothelium status , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  E. Dougherty,et al.  Size distributions for multivariate morphological granulometries: texture classification and statistical properties , 1997 .

[17]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Non-homothetic granulometric mixing theory with application to blood cell counting , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Optimal Binary Morphological Bandpass Filters Induced by Granulometric Spectral Representation , 1997, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[19]  F. Prêteux,et al.  Off-line signature verification by local granulometric size distributions , 1997 .

[20]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Adaptive reconstructive tau-openings: convergence and the steady-state distribution , 1996, J. Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Counting white blood cells using morphological granulometries , 2000, J. Electronic Imaging.