The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

BACKGROUND The clinical efficacy of catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited by difficulty in achieving durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Suboptimal catheter tip-to-tissue contact force (CF) during lesion delivery is believed to reduce clinical efficacy. OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between catheter CF during irrigated catheter ablation for AF and clinical recurrences during follow-up. METHODS Thirty-two patients with paroxysmal AF underwent PVI by using a radiofrequency ablation catheter with a CF sensor integrated at its tip, and they were followed for 12 months. The relationship between the CF and clinical outcomes was determined. RESULTS Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of the veins. Thirty-five percent (351 of 1017) of the applications were placed with an average CF of <10 g (low CF). All patients treated with an average CF of <10 g (5 of 5 patients) experienced recurrences, whereas 80% of the patients treated with an average CF of >20 g (8 of 10 patients) were free from AF recurrence at 12 months. The analysis of the average force-time integral showed that 75% of the patients treated with <500 gs were recurrent whereas only 31% of the patients treated with >1000 gs had recurrences at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS The CF during catheter ablation for AF correlates with clinical outcome. Arrhythmia control is best achieved when ablation lesions are placed with an average CF of >20 g, and clinical failure is universally noted with an average CF of <10 g.

[1]  J. Ruskin,et al.  HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[2]  Aravinda Thiagalingam,et al.  Importance of Catheter Contact Force During Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluation in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model Using a Force‐Sensing Catheter , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  J. Ruskin,et al.  HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[4]  Elia Biganzoli,et al.  Updated Worldwide Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety of Catheter Ablation for Human Atrial Fibrillation , 2005, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[5]  Samuel Wann,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committ , 2006, European heart journal.

[6]  Andreas Metzner,et al.  Characterization of conduction recovery after pulmonary vein isolation using the "single big cryoballoon" technique. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[7]  Silvia G. Priori,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for PRAC , 2006 .

[8]  Hendrik Lambert,et al.  Area Under the Real‐Time Contact Force Curve (Force–Time Integral) Predicts Radiofrequency Lesion Size in an In Vitro Contractile Model , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  Nadir Saoudi,et al.  A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[10]  Atul Verma,et al.  Response of Atrial Fibrillation to Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation Is Directly Related to Resumption and Delay of Pulmonary Vein Conduction , 2005, Circulation.

[11]  S. Ernst,et al.  Recovered Pulmonary Vein Conduction as a Dominant Factor for Recurrent Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Complete Circular Isolation of the Pulmonary Veins: Lessons From Double Lasso Technique , 2005, Circulation.

[12]  Jens Seiler,et al.  Steam pops during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: feasibility of impedance monitoring for prevention. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[13]  David Keane,et al.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  David E. Haines,et al.  Determinants of Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: The Role of Electrode‐Tissue Contact Pressure and Duration of Energy Delivery , 1991 .

[15]  H. Lambert,et al.  Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop and Thrombus , 2008, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[16]  Fred H M Wittkampf,et al.  RF Catheter Ablation: Lessons on Lesions , 2006, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  M. Mack,et al.  Pulmonary vein isolation and autonomic denervation for the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by a minimally invasive surgical approach. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.