Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice.

This review defines terms such as accuracy, validity, and reliability, which are used to describe the quality of methods for taking x-rays and for analyzing digital images. Values for these parameters are described for techniques of taking standardized x-rays such as ear-rod fixation and fixation by use of teeth with a dental impression. In addition, values are given for linear measurements on digitized images and for quantitative image subtraction. Differences are addressed between quantitative subtraction with a reference ramp and relative subtraction using the computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) system. The relationship between radiographic bone height and clinical attachment level is also discussed. Finally, present and future use in the periodontal office of linear radiographic measurements on digital images and digital subtraction is discussed.

[1]  I Magnusson,et al.  Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial. , 1996, Journal of periodontal research.

[2]  R. L. Webber,et al.  A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. , 1986, Journal of periodontal research.

[3]  S. Socransky,et al.  A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs. , 1983, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  R L Webber,et al.  Computer Correction of Projective Distortions in Dental Radiographs , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[5]  R L Webber,et al.  An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional dental radiographic imaging modalities. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  M. Trevisan,et al.  The Role of Osteopenia in Oral Bone Loss and Periodontal Disease. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  D. Cochran,et al.  Radiographic analysis of regenerated bone around endosseous implants in the canine using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  M. Lennon,et al.  The attachment level as a measure of early periodontitis. , 1984, Community dental health.

[9]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Long-term bone mass evaluation of mandible and lumbar spine in a group of women receiving hormone replacement therapy. , 1996, European journal of oral sciences.

[10]  M S Reddy,et al.  A semi-automated computer-assisted method for measuring bone loss adjacent to dental implants. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  E. Hausmann,et al.  Reproducibility of bone height measurements made on serial radiographs. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  R. Reinhardt,et al.  The association between estrogen status and alveolar bone density changes in postmenopausal women with a history of periodontitis. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[13]  L. Christersson,et al.  Computerized methodology for detection of alveolar crestal bone loss from serial intraoral radiographs. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  E. Hausmann,et al.  Detection of experimentally induced lesions in subtraction images of cancellous alveolar bone. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[15]  O. Schei,et al.  Alveolar Bone Loss as Related to Oral Hygiene and Age , 1959 .

[16]  B. Mealey,et al.  Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. , 1983, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  N P Lang,et al.  Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  E Hausmann,et al.  A contemporary perspective on techniques for the clinical assessment of alveolar bone. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  Influence of variations in projection geometry and lesion size on detection of computer-simulated crestal alveolar bone lesions by subtraction radiography. , 1991, Journal of periodontal research.

[21]  D. Cochran,et al.  Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  M. Jeffcoat,et al.  Digital Subtraction Radiography for Longitudinal Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Change: Method and Validation , 1993, Advances in dental research.

[23]  S R Matteson,et al.  Advanced imaging methods. , 1996, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[24]  U Brägger,et al.  Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. A methodological study. , 1988, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  E. Hausmann,et al.  Effect of x-ray angulation on radiographic periodontal ligament space width. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  E. Machtei,et al.  Studies on the relationship between changes in radiographic bone height and probing attachment. , 1994, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[27]  W D McDavid,et al.  Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[28]  R Webber,et al.  Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. , 1998, Journal of periodontal research.

[29]  E Hausmann,et al.  Subtraction radiography and computer assisted densitometric analyses of standardized radiographs. A comparison study with 125I absorptiometry. , 1985, Journal of periodontal research.

[30]  D. Benn.  Estimating the validity of radiographic measurements of marginal bone height changes around osseointegrated implants. , 1992, Implant dentistry.

[31]  E. Hausmann,et al.  What alveolar crest level on a bite-wing radiograph represents bone loss? , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[32]  R G Dunford,et al.  Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements. , 1996, Journal of periodontal research.

[33]  P. Papapanou,et al.  A 10-year retrospective study of periodontal disease progression. , 1989, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[34]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Marginal bone level buccal to mandibular molars in digital radiographs from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. An in vitro study. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[35]  R. Genco,et al.  The relationship between radiographic and clinical changes in the periodontium. , 1997, Journal of periodontal research.

[36]  T M Lehmann,et al.  Observer-independent registration of perspective projection prior to subtraction of in vivo radiographs. , 1998, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[37]  R. L. Webber,et al.  Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone. A possible diagnostic indicator of osteoporosis. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[38]  D. Benn,et al.  A computer-assisted method for making linear radiographic measurements using stored regions of interest. , 1992, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[39]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Relationships between longitudinal changes in radiographic alveolar bone height and probing depth measurements: data from postmenopausal women. , 1999, Journal of periodontology.

[40]  L C Carpio,et al.  Evaluation of a simple modified radiographic alignment system for routine use. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[41]  C F Hildebolt,et al.  Osteoporosis and oral bone loss. , 1997, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[42]  N P Lang,et al.  Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissue changes. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[43]  R L Webber,et al.  Change in trabecular architecture as measured by fractal dimension. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  M S Reddy,et al.  Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. , 1987, Journal of periodontal research.

[45]  D. Benn,et al.  A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. , 1990, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[46]  E. Hausmann.  Digital Subtraction Radiography: Then (1983) and Now (1998) , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[47]  R L Webber,et al.  Computers in dental radiography: a scenario for the future. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[48]  R C Williams,et al.  A new method for the comparison of bone loss measurements on non-standardized radiographs. , 1984, Journal of periodontal research.

[49]  E Hausmann,et al.  A reliable computerized method to determine the level of the radiographic alveolar crest. , 1989, Journal of periodontal research.

[50]  E Hausmann,et al.  Studies on the angular reproducibility of positioning patients adjacent to an x-ray tube. 2. A new electronically guided, force-sensitive sensor-based alignment system. , 1995, Journal of periodontal research.

[51]  Ray Williams,et al.  Periodontal regeneration of human infrabony defects. III. Diagnostic strategies to detect bone gain. , 1993, Journal of periodontology.

[52]  S M Dunn,et al.  Recognizing invariant geometric structure in dental radiographs. , 1992, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[53]  E. Hausmann,et al.  Effects of small angle discrepancies on interpretations of subtraction images. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[54]  N L Frederiksen,et al.  Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[55]  C. Hildebolt,et al.  A comparison of 2 patient populations using fractal analysis. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[56]  E Hausmann,et al.  Algorithm for the automated alignment of radiographs for image subtraction. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[57]  E Hausmann,et al.  Effect of x-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic alveolar crest level measurement. , 1989, Journal of periodontal research.

[58]  P. Eickholz,et al.  Validity of radiographic measurement of interproximal bone loss. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[59]  C. Hildebolt,et al.  Objective and subjective evaluations of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray film. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[60]  A Wenzel,et al.  Accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography for determining changes in calcium mass in mandibular bone: an in vitro study. , 2010, Journal of periodontal research.

[61]  D. Wobschall,et al.  Studies of the angular reproducibility of positioning patients adjacent to an x-ray tube: 1. Stent-rod based and extra-oral systems. , 1994, Journal of periodontal research.

[62]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. , 1984, Journal of clinical periodontology.