Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Tetlock,et al. The Effects of Top Management Team Integrative Complexity and Decentralized Decision Making on Corporate Social Performance , 2011 .
[2] Mark P. Sharfman,et al. Legitimacy, Visibility, and the Antecedents of Corporate Social Performance: An Investigation of the Instrumental Perspective , 2011 .
[3] Michael L. Barnett,et al. Does it Pay to Be Really Good? Addressing the Shape of the Relationship between Social and Financial Performance , 2011 .
[4] David J. Doorey. The Transparent Supply Chain: from Resistance to Implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss , 2011 .
[5] Philipp Schreck,et al. Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis , 2011 .
[6] Wendy K. Smith,et al. Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing , 2011 .
[7] Matt Eyring,et al. Nuevos modelos de negocios en los mercados emergentes , 2011 .
[8] Emily S. Block,et al. Why 'Good' Firms Do Bad Things: The Effects of High Aspirations, High Expectations and Prominence on the Incidence of Corporate Illegality , 2010 .
[9] S. Waddock,et al. Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources , 2010 .
[10] H. Greve,et al. Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct , 2010 .
[11] M. Canela,et al. Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity , 2010 .
[12] J. Pfeffer. Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor , 2010 .
[13] Michael von Hauff,et al. Sustainability-Driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Triangle , 2009 .
[14] Adelina Gnanlet,et al. Sequential and Simultaneous Decision Making for Optimizing Health Care Resource Flexibilities , 2009, Decis. Sci..
[15] Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al. Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance , 2009 .
[16] S. Brammer,et al. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance , 2008 .
[17] C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al. Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach , 2008 .
[18] Joshua D. Margolis,et al. Navigating the Bind of Necessary Evils: Psychological Engagement and the Production of Interpersonally Sensitive Behavior , 2008 .
[19] Clyde Eiríkur Hull,et al. Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation , 2008 .
[20] D. Marginson,et al. Exploring the debate on short-termism: a theoretical and empirical analysis , 2008 .
[21] Howard H. Stevenson. Cómo cambiar el mundo , 2008 .
[22] Joshua D. Margolis,et al. Do Well by Doing Good? Don't Count on It , 2008 .
[23] M. Toffel,et al. Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box , 2008 .
[24] L. Hosmer,et al. Strategic planning as if ethics mattered , 2007 .
[25] M. Porter,et al. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.
[26] P. Bansal,et al. Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms , 2006 .
[27] Timothy M. Devinney,et al. Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions , 2006 .
[28] Shawn L. Berman,et al. Measurement of Corporate Social Action , 2006 .
[29] N. Schwarz,et al. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations , 2006 .
[30] Tyson B. Mackey,et al. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies , 2007 .
[31] Wendy K. Smith,et al. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .
[32] Michael L. Barnett. Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .
[33] Jean-Philippe Bonardi,et al. Corporate Political Strategies for Widely Salient Issues , 2005 .
[34] James P. Walsh,et al. Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management , 2005 .
[35] J. D. Margolis,et al. Necessary Evils and Interpersonal Sensitivity in Organizations , 2005 .
[36] P. Bansal. Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .
[37] Irene Henriques,et al. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry , 2005 .
[38] C. Halaby,et al. Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice , 2004 .
[39] Ruth V. Aguilera,et al. Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations , 2004 .
[40] Sheldene K. Simola,et al. Ethics of Justice and Care in Corporate Crisis Management , 2003 .
[41] Sandra Waddock,et al. Myths and Realities of Social Investing , 2003 .
[42] R. Phillips. Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics , 2003 .
[43] Fabrizio Ferraro,et al. Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling , 2003 .
[44] J. D. Margolis,et al. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .
[45] Badi H. Baltagi,et al. Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?: A pretest estimator , 2003 .
[46] Tim Rowley,et al. When Will Stakeholder Groups Act? An Interest- and Identity-Based Model of Stakeholder Group Mobilization , 2003 .
[47] F. Schmidt,et al. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .
[48] Karl Heiner,et al. Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness , 2002 .
[49] J. Hardin,et al. Generalized Estimating Equations , 2002 .
[50] L. Preston,et al. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth , 2002 .
[51] Andrew King,et al. Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction , 2002, Manag. Sci..
[52] Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al. Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .
[53] John D. Benjamin,et al. Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2001 .
[54] Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al. Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research , 2001 .
[55] Simon Zadek,et al. The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship , 2001 .
[56] S. Julian,et al. Complexifying Organizational Theory: Illustrations using Time Research , 2001 .
[57] A. Hillman,et al. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .
[58] Abagail McWilliams,et al. Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .
[59] Marianne W. Lewis. Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .
[60] Kendall Roth,et al. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .
[61] Sanjay Sharma. Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .
[62] Abagail McWilliams,et al. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .
[63] R. Klassen,et al. The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .
[64] Shawn L. Berman,et al. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance , 1999 .
[65] Ronald K. Mitchell,et al. Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .
[66] Philip L. Cochran,et al. Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices , 1999 .
[67] E. Porter. Feminist Perspectives on Ethics , 1999 .
[68] K. Strike,et al. Justice and caring : the search for common ground in education , 1999 .
[69] T. L. Osterhus. Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and how do they Work? , 1997 .
[70] M. Russo,et al. A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .
[71] Samuel B. Graves,et al. The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .
[72] J. Mahon,et al. The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .
[73] Peter A. Dacin,et al. The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses , 1997 .
[74] L. Dosier,et al. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings , 1997 .
[75] Augustine A. Lado,et al. COMPETITION, COOPERATION, AND THE SEARCH FOR ECONOMIC RENTS: A SYNCRETIC MODEL , 1997 .
[76] Daniel B. Turban,et al. Corporate Social Performance And Organizational Attractiveness To Prospective Employees , 1997 .
[77] G. Clement. Care, Autonomy, And Justice: Feminism And The Ethic Of Care , 1996 .
[78] K. Laverty. Economic “Short-Termism”: The Debate, The Unresolved Issues, and The Implications for Management Practice and Research , 1996 .
[79] P. Shrivastava. The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability , 1995 .
[80] M. Starik,et al. Weaving An Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations , 1995 .
[81] Alfonso Montuori,et al. Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm? , 1995 .
[82] D. Denison,et al. Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .
[83] T. Gladwin,et al. Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .
[84] Mark C. Suchman. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .
[85] T. Jones. INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .
[86] Paul Shrivastava,et al. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage , 1995 .
[87] P. Shrivastava. Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society , 1995 .
[88] L. Preston,et al. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .
[89] Richard A. Johnson,et al. The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .
[90] A. Wicks,et al. A Feminist Reinterpretation of The Stakeholder Concept , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.
[91] Thomas W. Dunfee,et al. Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory , 1994 .
[92] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. The myopia of learning , 1993 .
[93] R. Jacobson. Unobservable Effects and Business Performance , 1990 .
[94] A. V. D. Ven,et al. Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .
[95] K. Cameron,et al. Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .
[96] E. Barbier. The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development , 1987, Environmental Conservation.
[97] K. Cameron. Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .
[98] S. Zeger,et al. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .
[99] R. Freeman. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .
[100] M. Hannan,et al. Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .
[101] C. Gilligan. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women''s , 1982 .
[102] Jerry A. Hausman,et al. Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects , 1981 .
[103] L. Kohlberg. Essays On Moral Development , 1981 .
[104] W. Damon,et al. A Simultaneous Decision Model for Production, Marketing and Finance , 1972 .
[105] Henry Allen Bullock,et al. Spatial Aspect of the Differential Birth Rate , 1943, American Journal of Sociology.