Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability

[1]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Integrative Complexity and Decentralized Decision Making on Corporate Social Performance , 2011 .

[2]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Legitimacy, Visibility, and the Antecedents of Corporate Social Performance: An Investigation of the Instrumental Perspective , 2011 .

[3]  Michael L. Barnett,et al.  Does it Pay to Be Really Good? Addressing the Shape of the Relationship between Social and Financial Performance , 2011 .

[4]  David J. Doorey The Transparent Supply Chain: from Resistance to Implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss , 2011 .

[5]  Philipp Schreck,et al.  Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis , 2011 .

[6]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing , 2011 .

[7]  Matt Eyring,et al.  Nuevos modelos de negocios en los mercados emergentes , 2011 .

[8]  Emily S. Block,et al.  Why 'Good' Firms Do Bad Things: The Effects of High Aspirations, High Expectations and Prominence on the Incidence of Corporate Illegality , 2010 .

[9]  S. Waddock,et al.  Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources , 2010 .

[10]  H. Greve,et al.  Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct , 2010 .

[11]  M. Canela,et al.  Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity , 2010 .

[12]  J. Pfeffer Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor , 2010 .

[13]  Michael von Hauff,et al.  Sustainability-Driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Triangle , 2009 .

[14]  Adelina Gnanlet,et al.  Sequential and Simultaneous Decision Making for Optimizing Health Care Resource Flexibilities , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[15]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance , 2009 .

[16]  S. Brammer,et al.  Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance , 2008 .

[17]  C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al.  Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach , 2008 .

[18]  Joshua D. Margolis,et al.  Navigating the Bind of Necessary Evils: Psychological Engagement and the Production of Interpersonally Sensitive Behavior , 2008 .

[19]  Clyde Eiríkur Hull,et al.  Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation , 2008 .

[20]  D. Marginson,et al.  Exploring the debate on short-termism: a theoretical and empirical analysis , 2008 .

[21]  Howard H. Stevenson Cómo cambiar el mundo , 2008 .

[22]  Joshua D. Margolis,et al.  Do Well by Doing Good? Don't Count on It , 2008 .

[23]  M. Toffel,et al.  Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box , 2008 .

[24]  L. Hosmer,et al.  Strategic planning as if ethics mattered , 2007 .

[25]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[26]  P. Bansal,et al.  Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms , 2006 .

[27]  Timothy M. Devinney,et al.  Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions , 2006 .

[28]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Measurement of Corporate Social Action , 2006 .

[29]  N. Schwarz,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations , 2006 .

[30]  Tyson B. Mackey,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies , 2007 .

[31]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[32]  Michael L. Barnett Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[33]  Jean-Philippe Bonardi,et al.  Corporate Political Strategies for Widely Salient Issues , 2005 .

[34]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management , 2005 .

[35]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Necessary Evils and Interpersonal Sensitivity in Organizations , 2005 .

[36]  P. Bansal Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .

[37]  Irene Henriques,et al.  Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry , 2005 .

[38]  C. Halaby,et al.  Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice , 2004 .

[39]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations , 2004 .

[40]  Sheldene K. Simola,et al.  Ethics of Justice and Care in Corporate Crisis Management , 2003 .

[41]  Sandra Waddock,et al.  Myths and Realities of Social Investing , 2003 .

[42]  R. Phillips Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics , 2003 .

[43]  Fabrizio Ferraro,et al.  Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling , 2003 .

[44]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[45]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?: A pretest estimator , 2003 .

[46]  Tim Rowley,et al.  When Will Stakeholder Groups Act? An Interest- and Identity-Based Model of Stakeholder Group Mobilization , 2003 .

[47]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[48]  Karl Heiner,et al.  Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness , 2002 .

[49]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations , 2002 .

[50]  L. Preston,et al.  Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth , 2002 .

[51]  Andrew King,et al.  Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[52]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[53]  John D. Benjamin,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2001 .

[54]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research , 2001 .

[55]  Simon Zadek,et al.  The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship , 2001 .

[56]  S. Julian,et al.  Complexifying Organizational Theory: Illustrations using Time Research , 2001 .

[57]  A. Hillman,et al.  Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .

[58]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[59]  Marianne W. Lewis Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[60]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[61]  Sanjay Sharma Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[62]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .

[63]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[64]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance , 1999 .

[65]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[66]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices , 1999 .

[67]  E. Porter Feminist Perspectives on Ethics , 1999 .

[68]  K. Strike,et al.  Justice and caring : the search for common ground in education , 1999 .

[69]  T. L. Osterhus Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and how do they Work? , 1997 .

[70]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[71]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[72]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[73]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses , 1997 .

[74]  L. Dosier,et al.  Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings , 1997 .

[75]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  COMPETITION, COOPERATION, AND THE SEARCH FOR ECONOMIC RENTS: A SYNCRETIC MODEL , 1997 .

[76]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance And Organizational Attractiveness To Prospective Employees , 1997 .

[77]  G. Clement Care, Autonomy, And Justice: Feminism And The Ethic Of Care , 1996 .

[78]  K. Laverty Economic “Short-Termism”: The Debate, The Unresolved Issues, and The Implications for Management Practice and Research , 1996 .

[79]  P. Shrivastava The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability , 1995 .

[80]  M. Starik,et al.  Weaving An Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations , 1995 .

[81]  Alfonso Montuori,et al.  Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm? , 1995 .

[82]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[83]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[84]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[85]  T. Jones INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[86]  Paul Shrivastava,et al.  Environmental technologies and competitive advantage , 1995 .

[87]  P. Shrivastava Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society , 1995 .

[88]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[89]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[90]  A. Wicks,et al.  A Feminist Reinterpretation of The Stakeholder Concept , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[91]  Thomas W. Dunfee,et al.  Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory , 1994 .

[92]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[93]  R. Jacobson Unobservable Effects and Business Performance , 1990 .

[94]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[95]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .

[96]  E. Barbier The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development , 1987, Environmental Conservation.

[97]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[98]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[99]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[100]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[101]  C. Gilligan In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women''s , 1982 .

[102]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects , 1981 .

[103]  L. Kohlberg Essays On Moral Development , 1981 .

[104]  W. Damon,et al.  A Simultaneous Decision Model for Production, Marketing and Finance , 1972 .

[105]  Henry Allen Bullock,et al.  Spatial Aspect of the Differential Birth Rate , 1943, American Journal of Sociology.