Should tissue structure suppress or amplify selection to minimize cancer risk?

BackgroundIt has been frequently argued that tissues evolved to suppress the accumulation of growth enhancing cancer inducing mutations. A prominent example is the hierarchical structure of tissues with high cell turnover, where a small number of tissue specific stem cells produces a large number of specialized progeny during multiple differentiation steps. Another well known mechanism is the spatial organization of stem cell populations and it is thought that this organization suppresses fitness enhancing mutations. However, in small populations the suppression of advantageous mutations typically also implies an increased accumulation of deleterious mutations. Thus, it becomes an important question whether the suppression of potentially few advantageous mutations outweighs the combined effects of many deleterious mutations.ResultsWe argue that the distribution of mutant fitness effects, e.g. the probability to hit a strong driver compared to many deleterious mutations, is crucial for the optimal organization of a cancer suppressing tissue architecture and should be taken into account in arguments for the evolution of such tissues.ConclusionWe show that for systems that are composed of few cells reflecting the typical organization of a stem cell niche, amplification or suppression of selection can arise from subtle changes in the architecture. Moreover, we discuss special tissue structures that can suppress most types of non-neutral mutations simultaneously.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Benjamin Allen, Andreas Deutsch and Ignacio Rodriguez-Brenes. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers’ comments section.

[1]  R. Durrett,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of tumor progression with random fitness values. , 2010, Theoretical population biology.

[2]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  The effect of population structure on the rate of evolution , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Alexander G. Fletcher,et al.  Quantification of Crypt and Stem Cell Evolution in the Normal and Neoplastic Human Colon , 2014, Cell reports.

[4]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Accumulation of driver and passenger mutations during tumor progression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Kassen,et al.  Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Nicholas A. Wright,et al.  The biology of epithelial cell populations , 1984 .

[7]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[8]  Steven A Frank,et al.  Stochastic elimination of cancer cells , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Somatic mutations and the hierarchy of hematopoiesis , 2010, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[10]  Tom Lenaerts,et al.  Dynamics of Mutant Cells in Hierarchical Organized Tissues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Charles M. Grinstead,et al.  Introduction to probability , 1999, Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences.

[12]  J. Krug,et al.  Clonal interference in large populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[14]  Ignacio A. Rodriguez-Brenes,et al.  Minimizing the risk of cancer: tissue architecture and cellular replication limits , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  Natalia L. Komarova,et al.  The duality of spatial death–birth and birth–death processes and limitations of the isothermal theorem , 2014, Royal Society Open Science.

[16]  Shane T. Jensen,et al.  Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans. , 2015, JAMA.

[17]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[18]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Counterintuitive properties of the fixation time in network-structured populations , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  Amplifiers of selection , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  J. Kingman A FIRST COURSE IN STOCHASTIC PROCESSES , 1967 .

[21]  C. Höög,et al.  Merotelic attachments allow alignment and stabilization of chromatids in meiosis II oocytes , 2014, Nature Communications.

[22]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Cancer initiation with epistatic interactions between driver and passenger mutations. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  N. Komarova,et al.  Epithelial tissue architecture protects against cancer. , 2006, Mathematical biosciences.

[24]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types , 2013, Nature.

[25]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Peto's paradox and human cancers , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  J. DeGregori,et al.  Stochastic modeling reveals an evolutionary mechanism underlying elevated rates of childhood leukemia , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer genes and the pathways they control , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[28]  R. Watson,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SIGN EPISTASIS AND GENETIC COSTRAINT ON EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  C. Zeyl,et al.  Estimates of the rate and distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.

[30]  M. Nowak,et al.  The linear process of somatic evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Andrea Sottoriva,et al.  Defining Stem Cell Dynamics in Models of Intestinal Tumor Initiation , 2013, Science.

[32]  Allon M Klein,et al.  Intestinal Stem Cell Replacement Follows a Pattern of Neutral Drift , 2010, Science.

[33]  C. Maley,et al.  Spatial structure increases the waiting time for cancer , 2011, New journal of physics.

[34]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis , 1990, Cell.

[35]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Introduction to Probability , 2002 .

[36]  Andrea Sottoriva,et al.  Cancer Evolution and the Limits of Predictability in Precision Cancer Medicine , 2016, Trends in cancer.

[37]  C. Hauert,et al.  Social evolution in structured populations , 2014, Nature Communications.

[38]  Louis Vermeulen,et al.  Stem cell dynamics in homeostasis and cancer of the intestine , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[39]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Exact numerical calculation of fixation probability and time on graphs , 2015, Biosyst..

[40]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Genetic Progression and the Waiting Time to Cancer , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions , 2015, Science.

[42]  L. Wahl,et al.  The Effects of Population Bottlenecks on Clonal Interference, and the Adaptation Effective Population Size , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  P. Keightley,et al.  A Comparison of Models to Infer the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations , 2013, Genetics.

[44]  Tim Holland-Letz,et al.  Fundamental properties of unperturbed haematopoiesis from stem cells in vivo , 2015, Nature.

[45]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  The Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Deleterious Amino Acid Mutations in Humans , 2006, Genetics.

[46]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  The Molecular Clock of Neutral Evolution Can Be Accelerated or Slowed by Asymmetric Spatial Structure , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[47]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Universality of fixation probabilities in randomly structured populations , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Daniel J. Gaffney,et al.  Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[49]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Consolidating Birth-Death and Death-Birth Processes in Structured Populations , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  S. Elena,et al.  The causes of epistasis , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Most Undirected Random Graphs Are Amplifiers of Selection for Birth-Death Dynamics, but Suppressors of Selection for Death-Birth Dynamics , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  R. Lenski,et al.  Negative Epistasis Between Beneficial Mutations in an Evolving Bacterial Population , 2011, Science.

[53]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  A First Course on Stochastic Processes , 1968 .

[54]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Reconstructing the in vivo dynamics of hematopoietic stem cells from telomere length distributions , 2015, eLife.

[55]  L. Hurst Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000, Heredity.

[56]  M. Nowak,et al.  Unwanted Evolution , 2013, Science.

[57]  H. Girardey,et al.  Trajectories , 2009, Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies.

[58]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Ontogenic growth as the root of fundamental differences between childhood and adult cancer , 2016, Stem cells.

[59]  R. Axelrod,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics , 2004 .