Beam modeling and verification of a photon beam multisource model.

Dose calculations for treatment planning of photon beam radiotherapy require a model of the beam to drive the dose calculation models. The beam shaping process involves scattering and filtering that yield radiation components which vary with collimator settings. The necessity to model these components has motivated the development of multisource beam models. We describe and evaluate clinical photon beam modeling based on multisource models, including lateral beam quality variations. The evaluation is based on user data for a pencil kernel algorithm and a point kernel algorithm (collapsed cone) used in the clinical treatment planning systems Helax-TMS and Nucletron-Oncentra. The pencil kernel implementations treat the beam spectrum as lateral invariant while the collapsed cone involves off axis softening of the spectrum. Both algorithms include modeling of head scatter components. The parameters of the beam model are derived from measured beam data in a semiautomatic process called RDH (radiation data handling) that, in sequential steps, minimizes the deviations in calculated dose versus the measured data. The RDH procedure is reviewed and the results of processing data from a large number of treatment units are analyzed for the two dose calculation algorithms. The results for both algorithms are similar, with slightly better results for the collapsed cone implementations. For open beams, 87% of the machines have maximum errors less than 2.5%. For wedged beams the errors were found to increase with increasing wedge angle. Internal, motorized wedges did yield slightly larger errors than external wedges. These results reflect the increased complexity, both experimentally and computationally, when wedges are used compared to open beams.

[1]  Validation of intensity modulation on a commercial treatment planning system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[2]  I. Rosen,et al.  Beam‐commissioning methodology for a three‐dimensional convolution/superposition photon dose algorithm , 2000, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  Aart A. van ‘t Veld Analysis of accuracy in dose and position in calculations of a treatment planning system for blocked photon fields , 1997 .

[4]  F. Gum,et al.  Verification of IMRT: Techniques and Problems , 2004, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[5]  Elinore Wieslander,et al.  Dose perturbation in the presence of metallic implants: treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo simulations. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A Fogliata,et al.  Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  J. Rødal,et al.  Measurement of dynamic wedge angles and beam profiles by means of MRI ferrous sulphate gel dosimetry , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  B. Fallone,et al.  Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system , 2002, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[9]  J J Battista,et al.  Generation of photon energy deposition kernels using the EGS Monte Carlo code. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  N Papanikolaou,et al.  Investigation of the convolution method for polyenergetic spectra. , 1993, Medical physics.

[11]  T. Knöös,et al.  The dosimetric verification of a pencil beam based treatment planning system. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Per Nilsson,et al.  Verification of dose calculations with a clinical treatment planning system based on a point kernel dose engine , 2002, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[13]  A Nisbet,et al.  The clinical implications of the collapsed cone planning algorithm. , 2004, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[14]  L. Weber,et al.  Dosimetric verification of modulated photon fields by means of compensators for a kernel model. , 2002, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[15]  R Roberts,et al.  How accurate is a CT-based dose calculation on a pencil beam TPS for a patient with a metallic prosthesis? , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Sloboda,et al.  Linear accelerator photon beam quality at off-axis points. , 1997, Medical physics.

[17]  J. Lydon,et al.  Photon dose calculations in homogeneous media for a treatment planning system using a collapsed cone superposition convolution algorithm. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  T R Mackie,et al.  Correcting kernel tilting and hardening in convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical divergent and polychromatic photon beams. , 1997, Medical physics.

[19]  Otto Sauer,et al.  Influence of Calculation Algorithm on Dose Distribution in Irradiation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) , 2004, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[20]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  A. Trepp,et al.  Acquisition of the effective lateral energy fluence distribution for photon beam dose calculations by convolution models , 1991 .

[22]  H Palmans,et al.  Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations. , 2002, Medical physics.

[23]  P. Carrasco,et al.  Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium. , 2004, Medical physics.

[24]  G. Starkschall,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1998, Medical physics.

[25]  P Andreo,et al.  Determination of effective bremsstrahlung spectra and electron contamination for photon dose calculations. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  G. Schaftenaar,et al.  Molden: a pre- and post-processing program for molecular and electronic structures* , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[27]  T. Mackie,et al.  A dual source photon beam model used in convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical megavoltage x-ray beams. , 1997, Medical physics.

[28]  M. Karlsson Implementation of Varian's EDW 5.2 on a Clinac 2300C/D for use with Helax TMS 3.1 dose planning system. , 1997, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[29]  H Hansson,et al.  Verification of a pencil beam based treatment planning system: output factors for open photon beams shaped with MLC or blocks. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  T Knöös,et al.  Dosimetric verification of open asymmetric photon fields calculated with a treatment planning system based on dose-to-energy-fluence concepts. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  G. A. Zakaria,et al.  Dosisverteilungen asymmetrischer Felder: Vergleich des Bestrahlungsplanungssystems Helax-TMS mit dem selbstentwickelten 2D-Berechnungsprogramm ASYMM , 2002 .

[32]  P. Hoban,et al.  Photon beam convolution using polyenergetic energy deposition kernels. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  D Thwaites,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy , 1995 .

[34]  P. Hoban Accounting for the variation in collision kerma-to-terma ratio in polyenergetic photon beam convolution. , 1995, Medical physics.

[35]  Eugene Wong,et al.  Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs. , 2003, Medical physics.

[36]  D. G. Lewis,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation and dosimetric verification of radiotherapy beam modifiers. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  A Ahnesjö,et al.  Collimator scatter in photon therapy beams. , 1995, Medical physics.

[38]  B. Bjärngard,et al.  Attenuation in high-energy x-ray beams. , 1994, Medical physics.

[39]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[40]  M Engelsman,et al.  Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[41]  A. Brahme,et al.  Calculation and application of point spread functions for treatment planning with high energy photon beams. , 1987, Acta oncologica.

[42]  A. Ahnesjö,et al.  A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation. , 1992, Medical physics.

[43]  A. Kivisaari,et al.  The clinical importance of magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 1998, Lung cancer.

[44]  Andrew Morgan,et al.  Dosimetric verification of a commercial collapsed cone algorithm in simulated clinical situations. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[45]  B Mijnheer,et al.  Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[46]  N. Richmond,et al.  Optimal clinical implementation of the Siemens virtual wedge. , 2003, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[47]  T Knöös,et al.  Verification and implementation of dynamic wedge calculations in a treatment planning system based on a dose-to-energy-fluence formalism. , 1996, Medical physics.

[48]  P W Hoban,et al.  Beam hardening of 10 MV radiotherapy x-rays: analysis using a convolution/superposition method. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  T Knöös,et al.  Limitations of a pencil beam approach to photon dose calculations in the head and neck region. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[50]  A. Ahnesjö Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. , 1989, Medical physics.

[51]  W F Hanson,et al.  A generic off-axis energy correction for linac photon beam dosimetry. , 1998, Medical physics.

[52]  A Ahnesjö,et al.  Modeling transmission and scatter for photon beam attenuators. , 1995, Medical physics.

[53]  T. Mackie,et al.  Calculating dose and output factors for wedged photon radiotherapy fields using a convolution/superposition method. , 1997, Medical physics.

[54]  A. Ahnesjö,et al.  Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[55]  A Ahnesjö,et al.  Analytic modeling of photon scatter from flattening filters in photon therapy beams. , 1994, Medical physics.

[56]  T Knöös,et al.  Limitations of a pencil beam approach to photon dose calculations in lung tissue. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[57]  M. Aspradakis,et al.  Experimental verification of convolution/superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  P S Basran,et al.  Evaluation of optimized compensators on a 3D planning system. , 1998, Medical physics.

[59]  G D Lambert,et al.  Validation of treatment planning system data: variation in the modelling of three 6 MV beams for extreme rectangular fields. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.