Trapped in the Digital Divide: The Distributive Paradigm in Community Informatics

This paper argues that over-reliance on a “distributive paradigm” in community informatics practice has restricted the scope of the high tech equity agenda. Drawing on five years of participatory action research with low-income women in upstate New York, I explore the ways in which distributive understandings of technology and inequality obscure the day-to-day interactions these women have with ICT and overlook their justified critical ambivalence towards technology. Finally, I offer unique insights and powerful strategies of resistance suggested by my research collaborators in a drawing exercise intended to elicit alternative articulations of digital equity. If we begin from their points of view, the problems and solutions that can and should be entertained in our scholarship and practice look quite different.

[1]  M. Gurstein Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the Digital Divide , 2003, First Monday.

[2]  PM Shepard,et al.  Advancing Environmental Justice through Community-Based Participatory Research , 2002, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[3]  G. Sewell The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. , 1998 .

[4]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  Losing ground bit by bit: Low-income communities in the information age , 1998 .

[5]  A. Feenberg The Ambivalence of Technology , 1990 .

[6]  J. Mcconnaughey Falling through the net II: New data on the digital divide , 1998 .

[7]  S. Tefft Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[8]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  A. Clement,et al.  The Access Rainbow: Conceptualizing Universal Access to the Information/ Communications Infrastructure , 2000 .

[10]  A. Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet , 2002 .

[11]  Douglas Raber,et al.  The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth , 2002 .

[12]  David Fisher,et al.  Prometheus Wired: The Hope for Democracy in the Age of Network Technology , 2001 .

[13]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Bridging the Digital Divide: The Impact of Race on Computer Access and Internet Use. , 1998 .

[14]  Cho Jungah,et al.  Justice and the Politics of Difference , 1997 .

[15]  Raneta Lawson Mack,et al.  Digital Divide: Standing at the Intersection of Race and Technology , 2001 .

[16]  L. McCall,et al.  Complex Inequality: Gender, Class, and Race in the New Economy , 2003 .

[17]  Peter van Ham,et al.  Interview with the Author , 2001 .

[18]  Owen Adams Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide: A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America , 2000 .

[19]  A. Feenberg The critical theory of technology , 1990 .

[20]  Lisa J. Servon Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community, and Public Policy , 2002 .

[21]  J. F Rischard Connecting Developing Countries to the Information Technology Revolution , 1996 .

[22]  M. Yunus Crossing the Digital Divide: Microcredit and IT for the Poor , 2008 .

[23]  Michael Gurstein Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the Digital Divide , 2003, First Monday.

[24]  John Markoff,et al.  The high cost of high tech: The dark side of the chip , 1985 .

[25]  Robert D. Bullard,et al.  Dumping In Dixie: Race, Class, And Environmental Quality, Third Edition , 1994 .

[26]  Virginia E. Eubanks Technologies of Citizenship: Surveillance and Political Learning in the Welfare System , 2006 .

[27]  Fred B. Schneider,et al.  From the Editors: The Next Digital Divide , 2004, IEEE Security and Privacy.

[28]  Tony Wilhelm,et al.  Connecting Kids to Technology: Challenges and Opportunities. KIDS COUNT Snapshot. , 2002 .

[29]  G. Sewell,et al.  `Someone to Watch Over Me': Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time Labour Process , 1992 .