Perceptions of Australians with diabetes‐related foot disease on requirements for effective secondary prevention

INTRODUCTION Secondary prevention is essential in reducing recurrence of diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) but is frequently poorly implemented in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To explore the perceptions of people with diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) on their self-perceived knowledge in managing DFD, facilitators and barriers influencing their DFD care, and ideas and preferences for a secondary prevention program. DESIGN Sixteen people with a history of DFD from Queensland and Victoria, Australia, underwent semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded over telephone and transcribed and analysed following a thematic framework. Participants were asked about their experiences and perceptions relating to DFD and factors influencing the care they receive for DFD relevant to the development of a secondary prevention program for DFD. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION Participants had high self-perceived knowledge in managing DFD, especially in implementing healthy lifestyle changes and conducting daily foot checks and foot care, though most received support from family members acting as carers. However, issues with access and adherence to offloading footwear, and a lack of clear education received on footwear and other aspects of DFD care were perceived as major barriers. Improved patient education, provided in a consistent manner by proactive clinicians was perceived as an essential part of secondary prevention. Telehealth was perceived positively through facilitating faster care and considered a good adjunct to standard care. Health and technological literacy were considered potentially major barriers to the effectiveness of remote care. CONCLUSION People with DFD require improved access to offloading footwear and education about secondary prevention, which could be provided by telehealth with adequate support.

[1]  J. Golledge,et al.  Health Professionals' Opinions About Secondary Prevention of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease. , 2022, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[2]  J. Golledge,et al.  Effectiveness of Remotely Delivered Interventions to Simultaneously Optimize Management of Hypertension, Hyperglycemia and Dyslipidemia in People With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2022, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[3]  J. Golledge,et al.  Remotely Delivered Monitoring and Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews , 2021, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  J. Golledge,et al.  Meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of home foot temperature monitoring, patient education or offloading footwear on the incidence of diabetes‐related foot ulcers , 2020, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[5]  J. V. van Netten,et al.  Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update) , 2020, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[6]  Ângela Leite,et al.  Burden and quality of life in caregivers of patients with amputated diabetic foot. , 2020, PsyCh journal.

[7]  S. Bus,et al.  Motivational interviewing to improve adherence behaviours for the prevention of diabetic foot ulceration , 2019, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[8]  G. Ergün,et al.  It is not diabetic foot: it is my foot. , 2019, Journal of wound care.

[9]  P. Lazzarini,et al.  Pathway to ending avoidable diabetes‐related amputations in Australia , 2018, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Diabetes‐related lower‐extremity complications are a leading cause of the global burden of disability , 2018, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  D. Wukich,et al.  Patients With Diabetic Foot Disease Fear Major Lower-Extremity Amputation More Than Death , 2018, Foot & ankle specialist.

[12]  G. Leung,et al.  Views of Patients on Using mHealth to Monitor and Prevent Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Qualitative Study , 2017, JMIR diabetes.

[13]  S. Kuys,et al.  The silent overall burden of foot disease in a representative hospitalised population , 2016, International wound journal.

[14]  S. Bus,et al.  A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable , 2016, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[15]  C. Vassiliadis,et al.  The effect of creating new secondary health services on patients’ perceptions: a Kano service quality analysis approach , 2014 .

[16]  C. Alm-Roijer,et al.  Patient education for the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers , 2011 .

[17]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[18]  W. Karmally,et al.  Randomized, Controlled Trial of Diabetic Patient Education: Improved Knowledge Without Improved Metabolic Status , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[19]  M. Becker,et al.  The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later , 1984, Health education quarterly.

[20]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .