Validation of closure models for interfacial drag and turbulence in numerical simulations of horizontal stratified gas–liquid flows

Abstract The development of general models closer to physics and including less empiricism is a long-term objective of the activities of the HZDR research programs. Such models are an essential precondition for the application of CFD codes to the modeling of flow related phenomena in the chemical and nuclear industries. The Algebraic Interfacial Area Density (AIAD) approach allows the use of different physical models depending on the local morphology inside a macroscale multi-fluid framework. A further step of improvement of modeling the turbulence at the free surface is the consideration of sub-grid wave turbulence that means waves created by Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities that are smaller than the grid size. In fact, the influence on the turbulence kinetic energy of the liquid side can be significantly large. The new approach was verified and validated against horizontal two-phase slug flow data from the HAWAC channel and smooth and wavy stratified flow experiments of a different rectangular channel. The results approve the ability of the AIAD model to predict key flow features like liquid hold-up and free surface waviness. Furthermore an evaluation of the velocity and turbulence fields predicted by the AIAD model against experimental data was done. The results are promising and show potential for further model improvement.

[1]  F. Harlow,et al.  Numerical Calculation of Time‐Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface , 1965 .

[2]  Thomas J. Hanratty,et al.  Prediction of the initiation of slugs with linear stability theory , 1986 .

[3]  A. E. Dukler,et al.  Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas‐liquid flow in vertical tubes , 1980 .

[4]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Computing Method for All Flow Speeds , 1997 .

[5]  Maurizio Brocchini,et al.  The dynamics of strong turbulence at free surfaces. Part 1. Description , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  J. Fabre,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL DATA SET NO. 7: STRATIFIED FLOW, PART I: LOCAL STRUCTURE , 1987 .

[7]  Djamel Lakehal,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of sheared interfacial flow , 2006 .

[8]  M. Guingo,et al.  Validation of the Large Interface Method of NEPTUNE_CFD 1.0.8 for Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) applications , 2012 .

[9]  Graham B. Wallis,et al.  The onset of slugging in horizontal stratified air-water flow , 1973 .

[10]  Stéphane Zaleski,et al.  Viscous versus inviscid instability of two-phase mixing layers with continuous velocity profile , 2005 .

[11]  Geoffrey F. Hewitt,et al.  Numerical simulation of the onset of slug initiation in laminar horizontal channel flow , 2008 .

[12]  Deendarlianto,et al.  Numerical simulations of counter-current two-phase flow experiments in a PWR hot leg model using an interfacial area density model , 2011 .

[13]  Thomas Höhne,et al.  Experimental investigation and CFD simulation of horizontal stratified two-phase flow phenomena , 2008 .

[14]  J. P. Barach,et al.  Current sheet observations in a small theta pinch , 1975 .

[15]  D. Lakehal,et al.  Interface-turbulence interactions in large-scale bubbling processes , 2007 .

[16]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Theoretical Prediction of Onset of Horizontal Slug Flow , 1980 .

[17]  Graham B. Wallis,et al.  Two-Phase Slug Flow , 1961 .

[18]  Djamel Lakehal,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a sheared air–water flow with a deformable interface , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  A. Dukler,et al.  A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas‐liquid flow , 1976 .

[20]  M. Ishii,et al.  Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow , 2007 .

[21]  Yuriko Renardy,et al.  Temporal Evolution of Periodic Disturbances in Two-Layer Couette Flow , 1996 .

[22]  Stojan Petelin,et al.  Coupling of the interface tracking and the two-fluid models for the simulation of incompressible two-phase flow , 2001 .

[23]  Spiros V. Paras,et al.  CFD Code Application to Wavy Stratified Gas-Liquid Flow , 2001 .

[24]  Yehuda Taitel,et al.  A model for slug frequency during gas-liquid flow in horizontal and near horizontal pipes , 1977 .

[25]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[26]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  Numerical prediction of interfacial instabilities: Sharp interface method (SIM) , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[27]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[28]  Djamel Lakehal,et al.  Multi-physics treatment in the vicinity of arbitrarily deformable gas-liquid interfaces , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[29]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Experimental investigation of bubbly flow and turbulence in hydraulic jumps , 2009 .

[30]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[31]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[32]  Thomas Höhne,et al.  EXPERIMENTS AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HORIZONTAL TWO PHASE FLOW REGIMES , 2009 .

[33]  Y. Shikhmurzaev Moving contact lines in liquid/liquid/solid systems , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  Dominique Bestion,et al.  EXTENSION OF CFD CODES APPLICATION TO TWO-PHASE FLOW SAFETY PROBLEMS , 2010 .

[35]  K. Aziz,et al.  A flow pattern map for gas—liquid flow in horizontal pipes , 1974 .

[36]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  CFD Code Validation against Stratified Air-Water Flow Experimental Data , 2007 .

[37]  D. Bestion,et al.  Applicability of two-phase CFD to nuclear reactor thermalhydraulics and elaboration of Best Practice Guidelines , 2012 .