Identifying faces across variations in lighting: Psychophysics and computation

Humans have the ability to identify objects under varying lighting conditions with extraordinary accuracy. We investigated the behavioral aspects of this ability and compared it to the performance of the illumination cones (IC) model of Belhumeur and Kriegman [1998]. In five experiments, observers learned 10 faces under a small subset of illumination directions. We then tested observers' recognition ability under different illuminations. Across all experiments, recognition performance was found to be dependent on the distance between the trained and tested illumination directions. This effect was modulated by the nature of the trained illumination directions. Generalizations from frontal illuminations were different than generalizations from extreme illuminations. Similarly, the IC model was also sensitive to whether the trained images were near-frontal or extreme. Thus, we find that the nature of the images in the training set affects the accuracy of an object's representation under variable lighting for both humans and the model. Beyond this general correspondence, the microstructure of the generalization patterns for both humans and the IC model were remarkably similar, suggesting that the two systems may employ related algorithms.

[1]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  From Few to Many: Illumination Cone Models for Face Recognition under Variable Lighting and Pose , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Paul A. Griffin,et al.  Statistical Approach to Shape from Shading: Reconstruction of Three-Dimensional Face Surfaces from Single Two-Dimensional Images , 1996, Neural Computation.

[4]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[5]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects , 1998, Cognition.

[6]  A. Johnston,et al.  Recognising Faces: Effects of Lighting Direction, Inversion, and Brightness Reversal , 1992, Perception.

[7]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles , 2005, Vision Research.

[8]  S. Ullman,et al.  Generalization to Novel Images in Upright and Inverted Faces , 1993, Perception.

[9]  M. Tarr Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[11]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Invariant Recognition of Natural Objects in the Presence of Shadows , 2000, Perception.

[13]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[14]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  CBF: A New Framework for Object Categorization in Cortex , 2000, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[16]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Image-based face recognition under illumination and pose variations. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Object Classification Using a Fragment-Based Representation , 2000, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[18]  Peter W. Hallinan A low-dimensional representation of human faces for arbitrary lighting conditions , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[19]  Michael D. Heath,et al.  Are edges sufficient for object recognition? , 1998 .

[20]  M. Tarr,et al.  Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Illumination cones for recognition under variable lighting: faces , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[22]  D Kersten,et al.  Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth , 1997, Perception.

[23]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Face recognition using eigenfaces , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Towards a Computational Model for Object Recognition in IT Cortex , 2000, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[25]  A. Yuille,et al.  Two- and Three-Dimensional Patterns of the Face , 2001 .

[26]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Seong-Whan Lee,et al.  Biologically Motivated Computer Vision , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[28]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Illusory motion from shadows , 1996, Nature.

[29]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Face recognition from a single training image under arbitrary unknown lighting using spherical harmonics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? , 1998, Cognition.

[31]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination , 1998, Vision Research.

[32]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Face Recognition: The Problem of Compensating for Changes in Illumination Direction , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[35]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  Face Recognition , 2008, Encyclopedia of Multimedia.

[36]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Active and Adaptive Vision: Neural Network Models , 2000, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[37]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  What Is the Set of Images of an Object Under All Possible Illumination Conditions? , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[38]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  From few to many: generative models for recognition under variable pose and illumination , 2000, Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (Cat. No. PR00580).

[39]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[40]  W. L. Braje Illumination encoding in face recognition: effect of position shift. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[41]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Appearance Characterization of Linear Lambertian Objects, Generalized Photometric Stereo, and Illumination-Invariant Face Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[42]  M. Tarr,et al.  To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .

[43]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[44]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[45]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[46]  Berthold K. P. Horn Obtaining shape from shading information , 1989 .

[47]  Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al.  Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Face recognition: A study in information fusion using fuzzy integral , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[49]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Illumination effects in face recognition , 1998, Psychobiology.

[50]  R. Weale Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .