Visual Characterization and Diversity Quantification of Chemical Libraries: 1. Creation of Delimited Reference Chemical Subspaces
暂无分享,去创建一个
Vincent Le Guilloux | Lionel Colliandre | Stéphane Bourg | Luc Morin-Allory | Julie Dubois-Chevalier | Guillaume Guenegou | L. Morin-Allory | S. Bourg | J. Dubois-Chevalier | V. Guilloux | L. Colliandre | Guillaume Guenegou | Julie Dubois-Chevalier
[1] Kuo-Chen Chou,et al. Assessment of chemical libraries for their druggability , 2005, Comput. Biol. Chem..
[2] J J Baldwin,et al. Prediction of drug absorption using multivariate statistics. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[3] G. Schneider,et al. Voyages to the (un)known: adaptive design of bioactive compounds. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.
[4] Peter Willett,et al. Computational methods for the analysis of molecular diversity , 1996 .
[5] M. Lajiness. Dissimilarity-based compound selection techniques , 1996 .
[6] W. Guida,et al. The art and practice of structure‐based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective , 1996, Medicinal research reviews.
[7] Lorenz C. Blum,et al. Chemical space as a source for new drugs , 2010 .
[8] Ian T. Nabney,et al. Data Visualization during the Early Stages of Drug Discovery , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] Stéphane Bourg,et al. Collections of Compounds – How to Deal with them? , 2008 .
[10] T. Halgren. Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..
[11] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Pharmacokinetically based mapping device for chemical space navigation. , 2002, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.
[12] U Schopfer,et al. Molecular diversity management strategies for building and enhancement of diverse and focused lead discovery compound screening collections. , 2004, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[13] Jean-Louis Reymond,et al. A Searchable Map of PubChem , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[14] H. Verheij,et al. Leadlikeness and structural diversity of synthetic screening libraries , 2006, Molecular Diversity.
[15] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. The Design of Leadlike Combinatorial Libraries. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.
[16] Antonio Macchiarulo,et al. Exploring the other side of biologically relevant chemical space: insights into carboxylic, sulfonic and phosphonic acid bioisosteric relationships. , 2007, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[17] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Evaluation of Descriptors and Mini-Fingerprints for the Identification of Molecules with Similar Activity , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[18] Jean-Louis Reymond,et al. Virtual Exploration of the Chemical Universe up to 11 Atoms of C, N, O, F: Assembly of 26.4 Million Structures (110.9 Million Stereoisomers) and Analysis for New Ring Systems, Stereochemistry, Physicochemical Properties, Compound Classes, and Drug Discovery , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[19] Andreas Bender,et al. “Plate Cherry Picking”: A Novel Semi-Sequential Screening Paradigm for Cheaper, Faster, Information-Rich Compound Selection , 2007, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[20] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Chemography: the Art of Navigating in Chemical Space , 2000 .
[21] Egon L. Willighagen,et al. Bioclipse: an open source workbench for chemo- and bioinformatics , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[22] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Chemical database preparation for compound acquisition or virtual screening. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.
[23] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Chemical space navigation in lead discovery. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[24] A. Schuffenhauer,et al. Charting biologically relevant chemical space: a structural classification of natural products (SCONP). , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] P Willett,et al. Chemoinformatics - similarity and diversity in chemical libraries. , 2000, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[26] Dimitris K. Agrafiotis,et al. Multidimensional scaling and visualization of large molecular similarity tables , 2001 .
[27] Egon L. Willighagen,et al. CDK-Taverna: an open workflow environment for cheminformatics , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[28] Valler,et al. Diversity screening versus focussed screening in drug discovery. , 2000, Drug discovery today.
[29] Robert D. Brown. Descriptors for diversity analysis , 1996 .
[30] Egon L. Willighagen,et al. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An Open-Source Java Library for Chemo-and Bioinformatics , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[31] Rees,et al. Molecular diversity and its analysis. , 1999, Drug discovery today.
[32] Igor I Baskin,et al. Chemoinformatics as a Theoretical Chemistry Discipline , 2011, Molecular informatics.
[33] Anang A Shelat,et al. The interdependence between screening methods and screening libraries. , 2007, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[34] F. Lombardo,et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[35] Stefan Wetzel,et al. Corrigendum: Interactive exploration of chemical space with Scaffold Hunter , 2009 .
[36] Andreas Bender,et al. Plate-Based Diversity Selection Based on Empirical HTS Data to Enhance the Number of Hits and Their Chemical Diversity , 2009, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[37] John M. Barnard,et al. Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[38] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Differential Shannon Entropy as a Sensitive Measure of Differences in Database Variability of Molecular Descriptors , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[39] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Variability of Molecular Descriptors in Compound Databases Revealed by Shannon Entropy Calculations , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[40] Fred A. Hamprecht,et al. Chemical Library Subset Selection Algorithms: A Unified Derivation Using Spatial Statistics , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[41] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Oncology exploration: charting cancer medicinal chemistry space. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[42] L Xue,et al. Molecular descriptors in chemoinformatics, computational combinatorial chemistry, and virtual screening. , 2000, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[43] Alexander Chuprina,et al. Drug- and Lead-likeness, Target Class, and Molecular Diversity Analysis of 7.9 Million Commercially Available Organic Compounds Provided by 29 Suppliers , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[44] Igor I Baskin,et al. The One‐Class Classification Approach to Data Description and to Models Applicability Domain , 2010, Molecular informatics.
[45] Jianhua Z. Huang,et al. SPARSE LOGISTIC PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS FOR BINARY DATA. , 2010, The annals of applied statistics.
[46] Roberto Todeschini,et al. Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics , 2009 .
[47] Yanli Wang,et al. PubChem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..
[48] Ronald L. Graham,et al. An Efficient Algorithm for Determining the Convex Hull of a Finite Planar Set , 1972, Inf. Process. Lett..
[49] C. Dobson. Chemical space and biology , 2004, Nature.
[50] N. Baurin. Drug-Like Annotation and Duplicate Analysis of a 23-Supplier Chemical Database Totalling 2.7 Million Compounds. , 2004 .
[51] P. Labute. A widely applicable set of descriptors. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[52] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Chemical Descriptors with Distinct Levels of Information Content and Varying Sensitivity to Differences between Selected Compound Databases Identified by SE-DSE Analysis , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[53] Alban Arrault,et al. Managing, profiling and analyzing a library of 2.6 million compounds gathered from 32 chemical providers , 2006, Molecular Diversity.
[54] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Molecular Descriptors for Effective Classification of Biologically Active Compounds Based on Principal Component Analysis Identified by a Genetic Algorithm , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[55] Sorel Muresan,et al. ChemGPS-NP: tuned for navigation in biologically relevant chemical space. , 2007, Journal of natural products.
[56] Rajarshi Guha,et al. Chemoinformatic Analysis of Combinatorial Libraries, Drugs, Natural Products, and Molecular Libraries Small Molecule Repository , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[57] Dimitris K. Agrafiotis,et al. Multidimensional scaling and visualization of large molecular similarity tables , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..
[58] A. Gorse. Diversity in medicinal chemistry space. , 2006, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[59] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[60] M. Congreve,et al. A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[61] Peter Meier,et al. Key aspects of the Novartis compound collection enhancement project for the compilation of a comprehensive chemogenomics drug discovery screening collection. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[62] Johann Gasteiger,et al. Assessing Similarity and Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries by Spatial Autocorrelation Functions and Neural Networks , 1996 .
[63] Jun Xu,et al. Selecting Diversified Compounds to Build a Tangible Library for Biological and Biochemical Assays , 2010, Molecules.
[64] M. Giese,et al. Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2006, Nature.
[65] Stefan Wetzel,et al. The Scaffold Tree - Visualization of the Scaffold Universe by Hierarchical Scaffold Classification , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[66] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.
[67] Alexander Tropsha,et al. Trust, But Verify: On the Importance of Chemical Structure Curation in Cheminformatics and QSAR Modeling Research , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[68] J. Irwin,et al. ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .
[69] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Design and Exploration of Target-Selective Chemical Space Representations , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[70] José L. Medina-Franco,et al. Visualization of the Chemical Space in Drug Discovery , 2008 .
[71] C. Steinbeck,et al. Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK) - an open-source java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.
[72] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[73] Clemencia Pinilla,et al. A Similarity‐based Data‐fusion Approach to the Visual Characterization and Comparison of Compound Databases , 2007, Chemical biology & drug design.
[74] Lahana,et al. How many leads from HTS? , 1999, Drug discovery today.
[75] Jérôme Hert,et al. Comparison of Fingerprint-Based Methods for Virtual Screening Using Multiple Bioactive Reference Structures , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[76] Thierry Kogej,et al. ChemGPS-NPWeb: chemical space navigation online , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[77] H Matter,et al. Random or rational design? Evaluation of diverse compound subsets from chemical structure databases. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[78] Melissa R. Landon,et al. JEDA: Joint entropy diversity analysis. An information-theoretic method for choosing diverse and representative subsets from combinatorial libraries , 2006, Molecular Diversity.
[79] Stephen D. Pickett,et al. Partition-based selection , 1996 .
[80] P Schneider,et al. Self-organizing maps in drug discovery: compound library design, scaffold-hopping, repurposing. , 2009, Current medicinal chemistry.
[81] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases* , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[82] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Differential Shannon Entropy Analysis Identifies Molecular Property Descriptors that Predict Aqueous Solubility of Synthetic Compounds with High Accuracy in Binary QSAR Calculations , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[83] R. Cramer,et al. Toward general methods of targeted library design: topomer shape similarity searching with diverse structures as queries. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[84] Dan C. Fara,et al. Lead-like, drug-like or “Pub-like”: how different are they? , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[85] Lorenz C. Blum,et al. 970 million druglike small molecules for virtual screening in the chemical universe database GDB-13. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[86] Aristides Gionis,et al. What is the Dimension of Your Binary Data? , 2006, Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06).