Integrating Inquiry-based Learning into Undergraduate Geology

Despite robust rationales for using an inquiry-based pedagogy in university and college-level science courses, it is conspicuously absent from many of today's classrooms. Inquiry-based learning is crucial for developing critical-thinking skills, honing scientific problem solving ability, and developing scientific content knowledge. Inquiry-based pedagogy provides students with opportunities to participate and practice the activities involved in science. There are a number of dimensions that are integral to the creation of an inquiry-based learning environment that are applicable to the geological sciences. We considered these dimensions in the design of an inquiry-based undergraduate geology course and collected quantitative and qualitative data that documents the successful implementation of this redesigned course. Our findings show that when appropriately structured, inquiry-based learning can help students develop critical scientific-inquiry skills, suggesting that inquiry-based learning is essential for teaching geology at the university or college level. With the proper alignment of course objectives, content, pedagogical design, tasks, assessment strategies, and instructor and student roles, geoscience instructors at the university or college level can create inquiry-based learning environments in which students are able to successfully develop skills in scientific inquiry as well as geological content knowledge.

[1]  Christopher M. Hoadley,et al.  Web for Your Head: The Design of Digital Resources to Enhance Lifelong Learning , 1996, D Lib Mag..

[2]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Why Do Teachers Need to Use Technology in Their Classrooms? Issues, Problems, and Solutions , 2003 .

[3]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[4]  Harvey Z. Yazijian,et al.  The Revolution in Earth and Space Science Education. , 2002 .

[5]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[6]  Wendell H. Potter,et al.  Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors , 2004 .

[7]  George E. Glasson,et al.  Investigative Learning in Undergraduate Freshman Biology Laboratories. , 1998 .

[8]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Written Discourse in Scientific Communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language , 2006 .

[9]  Eleanor Dantzler Siebert,et al.  College Pathways to the Science Education Standards , 2001 .

[10]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  The roles of digital libraries in teaching and learning , 1995, CACM.

[11]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[12]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[13]  D. Ezzy.  Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation , 2002 .

[14]  C. Kent Keller,et al.  A Framework for Integrating Quantitative Geologic Problem Solving into Courses Across the Undergraduate Geology Curriculum , 2000 .

[15]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning Science and the Science of Learning , 1988 .

[16]  Michael P. Clough,et al.  USING THE LABORATORY TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING , 2002 .

[17]  Tom Wolfe,et al.  Declining by Degrees: Higher Education at Risk , 2006 .

[18]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[19]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[20]  D. Jackson,et al.  Individual differences in affective and conative functions. , 1996 .