Technetium and Iodine Getters to Improve Cast Stone Performance

To determine the effectiveness of the various getter materials prior to their solidification in Cast Stone, a series of batch sorption experiments was performed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. To quantify the effectiveness of the removal of Tc(VII) and I(I) from solution by getters, the distribution coefficient, Kd (mL/g), was calculated. Testing involved placing getter material in contact with spiked waste solutions at a 1:100 solid-to-solution ratio for periods up to 45 days with periodic solution sampling. One Tc getter was also tested at a 1:10 solid-to-solution ratio. Two different solution media, 18.2 MΩ deionized water (DI H2O) and a 7.8 M Na LAW simulant, were used in the batch sorption tests. Each test was conducted at room temperature in an anoxic chamber containing N2 with a small amount of H2 (0.7%) to maintain anoxic conditions. Each getter-solution combination was run in duplicate. Three Tc- and I-doping concentrations were used separately in aliquots of both the 18.2 MΩ DI H2O and a 7.8 M Na LAW waste simulant. The 1× concentration was developed based on Hanford Tank Waste Operations Simulator (HTWOS) model runs to support the River Protection Project System Plan Revision 6. The other two concentrations were 5× andmore » 10× of the HTWOS values. The Tc and I tests were run separately (i.e., the solutions did not contain both solutes). Sampling of the solid-solution mixtures occurred nominally after 0.2, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 days and ~35 to 45 days. Seven getter materials were tested for Tc and five materials were tested for I. The seven Tc getters were blast furnace slag 1 (BFS1) (northwest source), BFS2 (southeast source), Sn(II)-treated apatite, Sn(II) chloride, nano tin phosphate, KMS (a potassium-metal-sulfide), and tin hydroxapatite. The five iodine getters were layered bismuth hydroxide (LBH), argentite mineral, synthetic argentite, silver-treated carbon, and silver-treated zeolite. The Tc Kd values measured from experiments conducted using the 7.8 M Na LAW simulant (the simulant selected to represent LAW) for the first 15 days for four Tc getters (BFS1, BFS2, Sn(II)-treated apatite, and Sn(II) chloride) show no, to a very small, capacity to remove Tc from the LAW simulant. For the Tc-getter experiments in the 7.8 M LAW simulant, the majority of the effluent samples show very small drops in Tc concentrations for the 35-day compared to the 15-day samplings. However, the Tc concentration in the simulant blanks also dropped slightly during this period, so the effect of the getter contacting LAW simulant at 35 days compared to 15 days is minimal; except that the BFS1 1:10 test shows a slow but steady decrease in Tc concentration in the LAW simulant supernatant from the beginning to the 35 day contact at which point about 20% of the original Tc has been removed from solution. Lastly, the KMS getter gives the highest Kd value for Tc at 35 days where Kd values have increased to 104 mL/g. When considering the different I getters reacting with the 7.8 M LAW simulant, two getters are much more effective than the others: Ag zeolite and Syn Arg. The other getters have calculated iodide distribution coefficients that show very limited effectiveness in the caustic conditions created by the LAW simulant. These are preliminary results that will need more detailed analyses including both pre- and post-batch sorption getter solid-phase characterization using state-of-the-art instrumentation such as synchrotron X ray absorption spectroscopy, which can delineate the oxidation state of the Tc and likely iodine species as well as some of the getters key major components, sulfur and iron in the BFS, and tin and sulfur in the tin-bearing and sulfur-bearing getters. This report also describes future experimental studies to be performed to better elucidate the mechanisms controlling the Tc and I sequestration processes in the various getters and leach tests of getter-bearing Cast Stone monoliths.« less

[1]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[2]  S. J. Gregg,et al.  Adsorption Surface Area and Porosity , 1967 .

[3]  P. G. Hill,et al.  A Fundamental Equation of State for Heavy Water , 1982 .

[4]  Fredrik P. Glasser,et al.  The Chemical Environment in Cement Matrices , 1985 .

[5]  R. J. Serne,et al.  Grouted waste leach tests: Pursuit of mechanisms and data for long-term performance assessment , 1989 .

[6]  Peiming Wang,et al.  A database and retrieval system for the NBS tables of chemical thermodynamic properties , 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[7]  C. W. Lindenmeier,et al.  Leach tests on grouts made with actual and trace metal-spiked synthetic phosphate/sulfate waste , 1989 .

[8]  W. D. Bostick,et al.  Solidification/stabilization of technetium in cement-based grouts , 1990 .

[9]  R. J. Serne,et al.  Leach test of cladding removal waste grout using Hanford groundwater , 1995 .

[10]  Akbar Montaser,et al.  Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , 1998 .

[11]  F. M. Mann,et al.  Hanford immobilized low-activity tank waste performance assessment , 1998 .

[12]  S. Oblath Relative Release Rates of Nitrate, Tc, Cs and Sr from Saltstone , 2001 .

[13]  F. M. Mann Risk Assessment supporting the decision on the initial selection of supplemental ILAW technologies , 2003 .

[14]  Shas V. Mattigod,et al.  Selection and Testing of "Getters" for Adsorption of Iodine-129 and Technetium-99: A Review , 2003 .

[15]  P. J. Certa RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT SYSTEM PLAN , 2003 .

[16]  Kenneth M. Krupka,et al.  Geochemical Data Package for the 2005 Hanford Integrated Disposal Facility Performance Assessment , 2004 .

[17]  J. Cline,et al.  Fundamental Parameters Line Profile Fitting in Laboratory Diffractometers. , 2004, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[18]  Ian L. Pegg,et al.  Final Report, Research Program to Investigate the Fundamental Chemistry of Technetium , 2000 .

[19]  John R. Harbour Stabilizing Grout Compatibility Study , 2004 .

[20]  L. L. Lockrem,et al.  CAST STONE TECHNOLOGY FOR TREATMENT & DISPOSAL OF IODINE RICH CAUSTIC WASTE DEMONSTRATION FINAL REPORT , 2005 .

[21]  W. Lukens,et al.  Evolution of technetium speciation in reducing grout. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  James L. Krumhansl,et al.  Yucca mountain project getter program results(year 1):I-129 and other anions of concern. , 2006 .

[23]  L. L. Lockrem,et al.  DEVELOPMENT & TESTING OF A CEMENT BASED SOLID WASTE FORM USING SYNTHETIC UP-1 GROUNDWATER , 2006 .

[24]  Chongmin Wang,et al.  Synthesis of organically templated nanoporous Tin(II/IV) phosphate for radionuclide and metal sequestration. , 2006, Inorganic chemistry.

[25]  J. Harbour,et al.  INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM: SUMMARY REPORT ON THE PROPERTIES OF CEMENTITIOUS WASTE FORMS , 2007 .

[26]  Duncan Jb,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF TECHNETIUM LEACHABILITY IN CEMENT-STABILIZED BASIN 43 GROUNDWATER BRINE , 2008 .

[27]  D. Kaplan,et al.  REDUCTION CAPACITY OF SALTSTONE AND SALTSTONE COMPONENTS , 2009 .

[28]  Eric M. Pierce,et al.  Review of Potential Candidate Stabilization Technologies for Liquid and Solid Secondary Waste Streams , 2010 .

[29]  Michael J. Lindberg,et al.  Waste Acceptance Testing of Secondary Waste Forms: Cast Stone, Ceramicrete and DuraLith , 2011 .

[30]  Hyun-Shik Chang,et al.  Immobilization of 99-technetium (VII) by Fe(II)-goethite and limited reoxidation. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Kirk J. Cantrell,et al.  Radionuclide Retention Mechanisms in Secondary Waste-Form Testing: Phase II , 2011 .

[32]  Marcia L. Kimura,et al.  Secondary Waste Form Development and Optimization—Cast Stone , 2011 .

[33]  Joseph H. Westsik,et al.  Data Package for Secondary Waste Form Down-Selection—Cast Stone , 2011 .

[34]  W. Lukens,et al.  Iron oxide waste form for stabilizing 99Tc , 2012 .

[35]  Wooyong Um,et al.  Characterization of Technetium Speciation in Cast Stone , 2013 .

[36]  Cast Stone Oxidation Front Evaluation: Preliminary Results For Samples Exposed To Moist Air , 2013 .

[37]  M. Kanatzidis,et al.  Selective Removal of Cs+, Sr2+, and Ni2+ by K2xMgxSn3–xS6 (x = 0.5–1) (KMS-2) Relevant to Nuclear Waste Remediation , 2013 .

[38]  Andreas C Scheinost,et al.  Redox behavior of Tc(VII)/Tc(IV) under various reducing conditions in 0.1 M NaCl solutions , 2013 .

[39]  Michael J. Lindberg,et al.  Supplemental Immobilization of Handford Low-Activity Waste. Cast Stone Screening Tests , 2013 .

[40]  K. Fox Preliminary Assessment of the Low-Temperature Waste Form Technology Coupled with Technetium Removal , 2014 .

[41]  Kirk J. Cantrell,et al.  Technetium Immobilization Forms Literature Survey , 2014 .

[42]  Joseph J. FrantiskaJr. EVALUATION AND SELECTION , 2020, Systems Engineering Principles and Practice.